AI · head to head
Amazon Q Developer vs JMP

Amazon Q Developer
AI
Generative AI assistant for coding, testing, and AWS development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

JMP
Machine Learning
Desktop statistical and design of experiments software from a SAS subsidiary
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Q Developer deepest value and AWS-specific expertise is tied to the AWS ecosystem, less compelling for non-AWS shops; JMP it is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Q Developer covers Code generation, JMP covers Custom design of experiments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Q Developer and JMP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Q Developer | JMP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Platforms | web, windows, mac, linux, api | Mac, Windows |
| Category | AI | Machine Learning |
| Founded | Unknown | 1976 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Q Developer
- Code generation
- Agentic task automation
- Security scanning
- Application transformation
- AWS expertise
- Private code customization
- Admin governance dashboard
- IP indemnity protection
Only in JMP
- Custom design of experiments
- Linked interactive graphics
- Analysis platforms
- Quality and process tools
- Graph Builder
- JSL scripting
- Scoring code export
- Predictive modelling in JMP Pro
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Q Developer
- AI-assisted code completion in an IDEnot JMP
- Automating Java and .NET application upgradesnot JMP
- Scanning codebases for security vulnerabilitiesnot JMP
- Getting AWS architecture guidance while codingnot JMP
- Automating feature implementation via agentsnot JMP
JMP
- Planning a physical experiment where each run is expensive, and the question is which twelve runs to perform rather than how to model data you already havenot Amazon Q Developer
- Process capability and control chart work in a manufacturing quality function that has to produce evidence for a customer or regulatornot Amazon Q Developer
- Exploratory analysis by an engineer or scientist who will not write code but needs more than a spreadsheetnot Amazon Q Developer
- Semiconductor, chemical and pharmaceutical development groups where JMP is already the shared language for reporting resultsnot Amazon Q Developer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Q Developer
- Deepest value and AWS-specific expertise is tied to the AWS ecosystem, less compelling for non-AWS shops
- Free tier caps agentic requests at 50 per month, which can be exhausted quickly on larger tasks
- Additional transformation usage beyond plan limits is billed per line of code, adding unpredictable costs
- GitHub and Eclipse integrations are still in preview, indicating incomplete platform coverage
JMP
- It is a desktop application holding the working table in memory, so a data set that outgrows the workstation has no in-place upgrade path, only a move to a different tool and a different skill set.
- There is no Linux build and no server edition for running analyses, so JMP cannot sit in a scheduled pipeline the way an R or Python script can, and recurring reports depend on a named person running them on a laptop.
- The predictive modelling capability most buyers mean when they call this machine learning software is in JMP Pro, a separate and more expensive licence, so the base product's price is not the price of the thing being evaluated.
- JSL is proprietary to JMP, so the scripts, add-ins and automation a group accumulates over a decade do not port anywhere and become sunk cost the moment anyone questions the renewal.
- Deployment ends at exported scoring code with no registry, monitoring or retraining, so a model that runs in production is maintained by another team in another language and steadily diverges from the version the analyst still has open.
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Q Developer
Free- FreeFree
- 50 agentic requests per month
- Access to latest Claude models
- IDE and CLI use
- Pro$19/month
- Expanded agentic request limits
- 4,000 lines of code per month per user for transformation, pooled at account level
- Admin dashboard with user and policy management
JMP
Free- TrialFree
- 30-day trial
- Full features
- JMP$1785/year
- Core JMP
- Standard features
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Q Developer if
- You need code generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want agentic task automation.
Choose JMP if
- You need custom design of experiments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Mac, Windows.
- You also want linked interactive graphics.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Q Developer or JMP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Q Developer starts at Free and JMP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Q Developer or JMP?
- Amazon Q Developer starts at Free and JMP at Free.
- Does Amazon Q Developer or JMP run on more platforms?
- Amazon Q Developer runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api. JMP runs on Mac, Windows.
- Can I use Amazon Q Developer for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Q Developer best used for?
- Amazon Q Developer is most often used for ai-assisted code completion in an ide, automating java and .net application upgrades, scanning codebases for security vulnerabilities, getting aws architecture guidance while coding. Of those, ai-assisted code completion in an ide and automating java and .net application upgrades are not what JMP is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Q Developer do that JMP cannot?
- Amazon Q Developer covers Code generation, Agentic task automation, Security scanning, Application transformation. JMP covers Custom design of experiments, Linked interactive graphics, Analysis platforms, Quality and process tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Q Developer: What does Amazon Q Developer cost?
There is a free tier with no cost, and a Pro tier priced at $19 per user per month that adds expanded agentic request limits, admin controls, and IP indemnity.
SourceJMP: Is JMP the same thing as SAS?
No. JMP is a separate desktop product from a SAS subsidiary, with its own interface, its own scripting language and its own licence. Knowing SAS does not transfer to it beyond the statistics.
Amazon Q Developer: What are the limits on the free plan?
The free tier includes 50 agentic requests per month, access to the latest Claude models in IDE and CLI, and 1,000 lines of code per month for Java transformation.
SourceJMP: Do I need JMP Pro?
If you want cross validation, penalised regression, boosted trees or neural networks, yes. The base edition covers classical statistics, graphics and design of experiments well and stops short of predictive modelling.
Amazon Q Developer: How is usage metered beyond plan limits?
Java and .NET transformation usage beyond the plan's included lines of code is billed as overage at $0.003 per line of code submitted.
SourceJMP: Does it run on Linux?
No. Windows and macOS only, as an installed application.
Amazon Q Developer: Can I cancel my Amazon Q Developer Pro subscription anytime?
Subscriptions are billed monthly per user and prorated in the first month, but canceling before the end of a billing month still incurs the full month's subscription fee.
SourceJMP: Can I put a JMP model into production?
Only by exporting the scoring formula as SQL, C, Python or similar and running it in another system. JMP itself does not serve, monitor or retrain models.
Amazon Q Developer: What counts as an agentic request?
Agentic requests include both question-and-answer chat interactions and autonomous coding tasks performed by Q Developer's agents, all drawn from the same monthly quota.
SourceJMP: Who actually uses it?
Process and quality engineers, and scientists in R&D, particularly in semiconductor, chemicals, pharmaceutical and medical device work. It is not usually chosen by data engineering or platform teams.
Related pages
More on Amazon Q Developer
Other head to heads
- Amazon Q Developer vs Tabnine
- Amazon Q Developer vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Amazon Q Developer vs Aider
- Amazon Q Developer vs Arize AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs Helicone
- Amazon Q Developer vs PromptLayer
- Amazon Q Developer vs AutoGen
- Amazon Q Developer vs Lindy
- Amazon Q Developer vs Claude
- Amazon Q Developer vs Gumloop
- Amazon Q Developer vs Manus
- Amazon Q Developer vs Writer
- Amazon Q Developer vs Resemble AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs Rev
- Amazon Q Developer vs AI21 Labs
- Amazon Q Developer vs Lambda Labs
- Amazon Q Developer vs Leonardo AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs DataRobot
- Amazon Q Developer vs AWS SageMaker
- Amazon Q Developer vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Q Developer vs IBM SPSS
- Amazon Q Developer vs Minitab
- Amazon Q Developer vs Stata
- Amazon Q Developer vs Jupyter
- Amazon Q Developer vs Weights & Biases
- Amazon Q Developer vs Orange
- Amazon Q Developer vs Databricks
- Amazon Q Developer vs Snowflake
- Amazon Q Developer vs Anaconda
- Amazon Q Developer vs Domino Data Lab
- Amazon Q Developer vs DVC
- Amazon Q Developer vs Fal AI
- Amazon Q Developer vs H2O.ai
- Amazon Q Developer vs Hugging Face
- JMP vs Tabnine
- JMP vs Sourcegraph Cody
- JMP vs Aider
- JMP vs Arize AI
- JMP vs Helicone
- JMP vs PromptLayer
- JMP vs AutoGen
- JMP vs Lindy
- JMP vs Claude
- JMP vs Gumloop
- JMP vs Manus
- JMP vs Writer
- JMP vs Resemble AI
- JMP vs Rev
- JMP vs AI21 Labs
- JMP vs Lambda Labs
- JMP vs Leonardo AI
- JMP vs DataRobot
- JMP vs AWS SageMaker
- JMP vs Google Vertex AI
- JMP vs Azure Machine Learning
- JMP vs IBM SPSS
- JMP vs Minitab
- JMP vs Stata
- JMP vs Jupyter
- JMP vs Weights & Biases
- JMP vs Orange
- JMP vs Databricks
- JMP vs Snowflake
- JMP vs Anaconda
- JMP vs Domino Data Lab
- JMP vs DVC
- JMP vs Fal AI
- JMP vs H2O.ai
- JMP vs Hugging Face
