Databases · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs Wasabi

Amazon Aurora
Databases
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Amazon Aurora has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and Wasabi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7.99/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Web, API |
| Category | Databases | Cloud |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot Wasabi
- Data storagenot Wasabi
- Application backendnot Wasabi
- Reportingnot Wasabi
- Data analyticsnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Amazon Aurora
- Media storagenot Amazon Aurora
- Archive replacementnot Amazon Aurora
- Ransomware protectionnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or Wasabi?
- Amazon Aurora has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Amazon Aurora and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Amazon Aurora or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Yes. Amazon Aurora has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that Wasabi cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Amazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs FaunaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs DataStax
- Amazon Aurora vs ScyllaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Aiven
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs QuestDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Vitess
- Amazon Aurora vs BigQuery
- Amazon Aurora vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Amazon Aurora vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Amazon Aurora vs DigitalOcean
- Amazon Aurora vs Hetzner Cloud
- Amazon Aurora vs Scaleway
- Amazon Aurora vs Linode
- Amazon Aurora vs Vultr
- Amazon Aurora vs Zeabur
- Amazon Aurora vs Porter
- Amazon Aurora vs Contabo
- Amazon Aurora vs Encore
- Amazon Aurora vs Google Cloud Platform
- Amazon Aurora vs Microsoft Azure
- Amazon Aurora vs HAProxy
- Amazon Aurora vs IBM Cloud
- Amazon Aurora vs kind
- Amazon Aurora vs Koyeb
- Amazon Aurora vs Kustomize
- Amazon Aurora vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs PlanetScale
- Wasabi vs Firebolt
- Wasabi vs FaunaDB
- Wasabi vs Cockroach Labs
- Wasabi vs Azure SQL
- Wasabi vs DataStax
- Wasabi vs ScyllaDB
- Wasabi vs MariaDB
- Wasabi vs Aiven
- Wasabi vs Apache Druid
- Wasabi vs Couchbase
- Wasabi vs QuestDB
- Wasabi vs Vitess
- Wasabi vs BigQuery
- Wasabi vs CosmosDB
- Wasabi vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

