APIs · head to head
Akoya vs Postman

Akoya
APIs
Bank-owned, token-based open finance network that replaces screen scraping for US financial data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Postman has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akoya coverage reaches several thousand institutions but does not match aggregators that can still scrape, so applications needing the long tail of small credit unions will run a second data provider alongside it.; Postman free plan limited to single user as of March 1, 2026, making it unsuitable for teams without paid plans
- They diverge on capability: Akoya covers FDX standard APIs, Postman covers API client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akoya and Postman actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akoya
- FDX standard APIs
- Token-based access
- Investment data
- Accounts, balances and transactions
- Statements and tax forms
- Customer identity
- Consumer permission management
- Single integration
Only in Postman
- API client
- Automated testing
- Mock servers
- Documentation
- Monitors
- Workspaces
- Version control
- API design
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akoya
- A wealth management platform that needs Fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since Fidelity closed that route in October 2023not Postman
- A tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload PDFsnot Postman
- A lender that needs a permissioning trail defensible under CFPB section 1033 rather than a credential-sharing arrangementnot Postman
- A bank that wants to meet data sharing obligations through one network connection instead of building and policing its own developer interfacenot Postman
Postman
- API testingnot Akoya
- API documentationnot Akoya
- API monitoringnot Akoya
- Team collaborationnot Akoya
- API developmentnot Akoya
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akoya
- Coverage reaches several thousand institutions but does not match aggregators that can still scrape, so applications needing the long tail of small credit unions will run a second data provider alongside it.
- The network is owned by large banks, so roadmap and coverage priorities reflect owner interests rather than those of the fintechs consuming the data, and a recipient has no leverage over which institutions are added next.
- Data availability is decided institution by institution, meaning a bank may expose balances but not transactions or investments, and recipients must verify field-level coverage per institution rather than assume the FDX model is fully populated.
- Pricing is unpublished and usage based, which makes it difficult to compare against aggregator pricing during a build-versus-buy decision and forces a sales cycle before you can model cost.
- The token model requires the institution to have implemented its side, so newly onboarded institutions arrive on the institution timetable, not yours, and a launch dependent on a specific bank can slip badly.
Postman
- Free plan limited to single user as of March 1, 2026, making it unsuitable for teams without paid plans
- Only 25 collection runs per month and 1,000 API calls/month on free tier
- Removed local-only Scratch Pad mode in 2023, forcing cloud account creation and sync
- Requires Postman account and internet connection for most features
- Cloud-first architecture with mandatory syncing to Postman's cloud servers
- No CI/CD integration or advanced security features on free plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Akoya
On request- Akoya Data Access$undefined/year
- Usage-based pricing quoted by data product and call volume
- Separate commercial terms for data recipients and for financial institutions joining the network
- No published rate card
Postman
Free- FreeFree
- 1 user
- 25 collection runs/month
- 1,000 API calls/month
- Team$14/month
- Team collaboration
- Shared workspaces
- API mocking
- Professional$29/month
- Team features
- Advanced security
- SSO
- Enterprise$49/month
- Professional features
- Custom integrations
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Postman if
- You need api client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want automated testing.
Questions people ask
- Is Akoya or Postman better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akoya starts at On request and Postman at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akoya or Postman?
- Postman has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Akoya and Free for Postman.
- Does Akoya or Postman run on more platforms?
- Akoya runs on Web. Postman runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Postman for free?
- Yes. Postman has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akoya starts at On request.
- What is Akoya best used for?
- Akoya is most often used for a wealth management platform that needs fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since fidelity closed that route in october 2023, a tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload pdfs, a lender that needs a permissioning trail defensible under cfpb section 1033 rather than a credential-sharing arrangement, a bank that wants to meet data sharing obligations through one network connection instead of building and policing its own developer interface. Of those, a wealth management platform that needs fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since fidelity closed that route in october 2023 and a tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload pdfs are not what Postman is typically brought in for.
- What can Akoya do that Postman cannot?
- Akoya covers FDX standard APIs, Token-based access, Investment data, Accounts, balances and transactions. Postman covers API client, Automated testing, Mock servers, Documentation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akoya: Who owns Akoya?
A group of large US banks. It was spun out of Fidelity, which is why Fidelity data access runs through it.
Postman: What is the cost of Postman?
Postman has a free plan limited to 1 user, 25 collection runs/month, 1,000 API calls/month. Team plans start at $14/user/month for Basic. Professional at $29/user/month, and Enterprise at $49/user/month.
SourceAkoya: Is Akoya screen scraping?
No. It uses FDX standard APIs with OpenID Connect tokens, so credentials are never shared with or stored by the data recipient.
Postman: Can I use Postman offline?
Postman requires an internet connection to sync collections to the cloud. Since 2023, the Scratch Pad local-only mode was removed. Users must sign in with a Postman account, and collections sync to cloud by default. Offline work is possible but limited without cloud sync features.
SourceAkoya: Can we use Akoya alone instead of an aggregator?
Usually not. Its investment and large-institution coverage is excellent, but the long tail of smaller institutions is thinner, so most teams run both.
Postman: Does Postman have team collaboration?
Team collaboration is not available on the free plan (limited to 1 user). Team plans start at $14/user/month and include shared workspaces, real-time collaboration, and team management features.
SourceAkoya: Does it help with CFPB section 1033?
It is designed around it, providing tokenised permissioned access and consumer revocation rather than credential sharing.
Postman: What are the free plan limits?
Free plan allows: 1 user only, 25 collection runs per month, 1,000 API calls/month, and 1,000 mock server calls/month. No CI/CD integration or advanced security features.
SourcePostman: Does Postman work with other development tools?
Postman integrates with Git repositories, offers a Node.js runner (Newman) for automation, and connects with popular CI/CD platforms. Teams using git-native workflows may prefer alternatives like Bruno.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Akoya vs Yodlee
- Akoya vs MX Technologies
- Akoya vs Ozone API
- Akoya vs Aiia
- Akoya vs Tink
- Akoya vs Salt Edge
- Akoya vs Trustly
- Akoya vs Lithic
- Akoya vs Token.io
- Akoya vs Bud Financial
- Akoya vs Tribe Payments
- Akoya vs Method Financial
- Akoya vs Asyncapi
- Akoya vs AWS API Gateway
- Akoya vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Akoya vs Basis Theory
- Akoya vs Boomi API Management
- Akoya vs Codat
- Akoya vs Storybook
- Akoya vs Lucidchart
- Akoya vs GitHub
- Akoya vs Notion
- Akoya vs Dropbox
- Akoya vs Whimsical
- Akoya vs Asana
- Akoya vs ClickUp
- Akoya vs Figma
- Akoya vs Auth0
- Akoya vs Monday.com
- Akoya vs Jira
- Akoya vs MongoDB
- Akoya vs Nagios XI
- Akoya vs Postgres
- Akoya vs Shortcut
- Akoya vs Site24x7
- Akoya vs MongoDB Atlas
- Postman vs Yodlee
- Postman vs MX Technologies
- Postman vs Ozone API
- Postman vs Aiia
- Postman vs Tink
- Postman vs Salt Edge
- Postman vs Trustly
- Postman vs Lithic
- Postman vs Token.io
- Postman vs Bud Financial
- Postman vs Tribe Payments
- Postman vs Method Financial
- Postman vs Asyncapi
- Postman vs AWS API Gateway
- Postman vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Postman vs Basis Theory
- Postman vs Boomi API Management
- Postman vs Codat
- Postman vs Storybook
- Postman vs Lucidchart
- Postman vs GitHub
- Postman vs Notion
- Postman vs Dropbox
- Postman vs Whimsical
- Postman vs Asana
- Postman vs ClickUp
- Postman vs Figma
- Postman vs Auth0
- Postman vs Monday.com
- Postman vs Jira
- Postman vs MongoDB
- Postman vs Nagios XI
- Postman vs Postgres
- Postman vs Shortcut
- Postman vs Site24x7
- Postman vs MongoDB Atlas

