Cybersecurity · head to head
Akeyless vs Proofpoint

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Akeyless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akeyless pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation; Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- They diverge on capability: Akeyless covers Secrets management, Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akeyless and Proofpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Akeyless | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $6/month |
| Pricing model | Usage-based pricing units that vary by product module | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises | Email, Cloud, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2002 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akeyless
- Secrets management
- Machine identity
- AI agent identity
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Multi-vault governance
- Encryption and KMS
- Password manager
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akeyless
- Securing AI agents with dedicated identity trackingnot Proofpoint
- Managing machine-to-machine credentials at scalenot Proofpoint
- Automating PKI and certificate lifecyclenot Proofpoint
- Implementing just-in-time privileged accessnot Proofpoint
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot Akeyless
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot Akeyless
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot Akeyless
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot Akeyless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akeyless
- Pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation
- Free tier is very limited with restricted access
- No transparent pricing published for enterprise features
- Pricing model varies significantly by product module
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
Pricing, plan by plan
Akeyless
Free- FreeFree
- Limited feature access
- Restricted usage quotas
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing based on usage
- Unlimited resource quotas
- Full feature access
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Akeyless if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises.
- You also want machine identity.
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Questions people ask
- Is Akeyless or Proofpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akeyless starts at Free and Proofpoint at $6/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akeyless or Proofpoint?
- Akeyless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Akeyless and $6/month for Proofpoint.
- Does Akeyless or Proofpoint run on more platforms?
- Akeyless runs on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises. Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web.
- Can I use Akeyless for free?
- Yes. Akeyless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Proofpoint starts at $6/month.
- What is Akeyless best used for?
- Akeyless is most often used for securing ai agents with dedicated identity tracking, managing machine-to-machine credentials at scale, automating pki and certificate lifecycle, implementing just-in-time privileged access. Of those, securing ai agents with dedicated identity tracking and managing machine-to-machine credentials at scale are not what Proofpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Akeyless do that Proofpoint cannot?
- Akeyless covers Secrets management, Machine identity, AI agent identity, Certificate management. Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akeyless: What pricing model does Akeyless use?
Akeyless uses usage-based pricing units that vary by product. For example, Secrets Management is priced by clients, Certificate Management by managed certificates, Encryption by transactions, and PAM by users. Contact sales for a custom quote.
SourceProofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
Akeyless: Does Akeyless support hybrid deployment?
Yes, Akeyless offers Pure SaaS cloud-managed deployment and Hybrid SaaS with on-premise gateways and zero-knowledge encryption for sensitive environments.
SourceProofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
Akeyless: How does Akeyless handle AI agent identities?
Akeyless provides dedicated AI agent identity tracking with runtime access control, allowing organizations to manage AI agent access separately from human and machine identities.
SourceProofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akeyless vs Infisical
- Akeyless vs Doppler
- Akeyless vs HashiCorp Vault
- Akeyless vs Frontegg
- Akeyless vs Endor Labs
- Akeyless vs Aikido
- Akeyless vs Speakeasy
- Akeyless vs Keeper Password Manager
- Akeyless vs Delinea
- Akeyless vs Chainguard
- Akeyless vs Tenable
- Akeyless vs Sticky Password
- Akeyless vs Grype
- Akeyless vs Hanwha Vision
- Akeyless vs Idira
- Akeyless vs IVPN
- Akeyless vs Logto
- Akeyless vs Malwarebytes
- Akeyless vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Akeyless vs Norton 360
- Akeyless vs 1Password
- Akeyless vs LastPass
- Akeyless vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Akeyless vs Mimecast
- Akeyless vs Qualys VMDR
- Akeyless vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Akeyless vs IBM QRadar
- Akeyless vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Akeyless vs VMware Carbon Black
- Akeyless vs Sysdig
- Akeyless vs Dahua Technology
- Akeyless vs Descope
- Akeyless vs Drata
- Akeyless vs DTiQ
- Akeyless vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Akeyless vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Infisical
- Proofpoint vs Doppler
- Proofpoint vs HashiCorp Vault
- Proofpoint vs Frontegg
- Proofpoint vs Endor Labs
- Proofpoint vs Aikido
- Proofpoint vs Speakeasy
- Proofpoint vs Keeper Password Manager
- Proofpoint vs Delinea
- Proofpoint vs Chainguard
- Proofpoint vs Tenable
- Proofpoint vs Sticky Password
- Proofpoint vs Grype
- Proofpoint vs Hanwha Vision
- Proofpoint vs Idira
- Proofpoint vs IVPN
- Proofpoint vs Logto
- Proofpoint vs Malwarebytes
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN

