Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs MyRec.com

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and MyRec.com actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot MyRec.com
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot MyRec.com
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot MyRec.com
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot MyRec.com
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot MyRec.com
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot Aikido
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot Aikido
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot Aikido
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or MyRec.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and MyRec.com at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or MyRec.com?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and On request for MyRec.com.
- Does Aikido or MyRec.com run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. MyRec.com runs on Web.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. MyRec.com starts at On request.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what MyRec.com is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that MyRec.com cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceMyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceMyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceMyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceMyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs CivicPlus
- Aikido vs OpenGov
- Aikido vs RecDesk
- Aikido vs Euna Solutions
- Aikido vs Springbrook Software
- Aikido vs Periscope Holdings
- Aikido vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Aikido vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Aikido vs GovPilot
- Aikido vs eCode360
- Aikido vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Aikido vs IAPro
- Aikido vs iCompass
- Aikido vs Mapbox Government
- Aikido vs Mark43
- Aikido vs MuckRock
- Aikido vs Municode
- Aikido vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs Snyk
- MyRec.com vs Veracode
- MyRec.com vs Tenable
- MyRec.com vs Legit Security
- MyRec.com vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- MyRec.com vs Qualys VMDR
- MyRec.com vs Arnica
- MyRec.com vs Sysdig
- MyRec.com vs Akeyless
- MyRec.com vs Infisical
- MyRec.com vs Tanium
- MyRec.com vs Doppler
- MyRec.com vs Passbolt
- MyRec.com vs Ping Identity
- MyRec.com vs Proofpoint
- MyRec.com vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- MyRec.com vs Recorded Future
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
