Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Sigstore

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sigstore has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Sigstore covers Fulcio.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Sigstore actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Sigstore
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Sigstore
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Sigstore
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Sigstore
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot Acunetix
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot Acunetix
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot Acunetix
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Sigstore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Sigstore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Sigstore?
- Sigstore has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for Sigstore.
- Does Acunetix or Sigstore run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Sigstore for free?
- Yes. Sigstore has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Sigstore is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Sigstore cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceSigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
Sigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
Sigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
Sigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Cosign
- Acunetix vs Syft
- Acunetix vs Logto
- Acunetix vs Infisical
- Acunetix vs Chainguard
- Acunetix vs Ory
- Acunetix vs Bitwarden
- Acunetix vs Semgrep
- Acunetix vs Trivy
- Acunetix vs authentik
- Acunetix vs Authelia
- Acunetix vs Resolver
- Acunetix vs Saviynt
- Acunetix vs Securiti
- Acunetix vs Speakeasy
- Acunetix vs Sysdig
- Acunetix vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs Norton 360
- Sigstore vs 1Password
- Sigstore vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Sigstore vs LastPass
- Sigstore vs Burp Suite
- Sigstore vs Veracode
- Sigstore vs Nessus
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Arnica
- Sigstore vs Doppler
- Sigstore vs Aikido
- Sigstore vs NordPass
- Sigstore vs One Identity
- Sigstore vs Ory Kratos
- Sigstore vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Sigstore vs Tenable Nessus
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable
