Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs HashiCorp Boundary

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only HashiCorp Boundary has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and HashiCorp Boundary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acunetix | HashiCorp Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web, Api | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web |
| Founded | 2005 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not HashiCorp Boundary
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot HashiCorp Boundary
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Acunetix
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Acunetix
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Acunetix
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or HashiCorp Boundary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and HashiCorp Boundary at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or HashiCorp Boundary?
- HashiCorp Boundary has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for HashiCorp Boundary.
- Does Acunetix or HashiCorp Boundary run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use HashiCorp Boundary for free?
- Yes. HashiCorp Boundary has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what HashiCorp Boundary is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that HashiCorp Boundary cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
HashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
HashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
HashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs BeyondTrust
- Acunetix vs Teleport
- Acunetix vs Delinea
- Acunetix vs Infisical
- Acunetix vs authentik
- Acunetix vs Logto
- Acunetix vs Ory
- Acunetix vs Saviynt
- Acunetix vs Beyond Identity
- Acunetix vs Keygen
- Acunetix vs KnowBe4
- Acunetix vs Legit Security
- Acunetix vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Acunetix vs Metasploit
- Acunetix vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Norton 360
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Bitdefender Total Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Burp Suite
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Veracode
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Nessus
- HashiCorp Boundary vs OWASP ZAP
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Arnica
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Doppler
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Aikido
- HashiCorp Boundary vs NordPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory Kratos
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Tenable Nessus
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream
