Softwr

Design · head to head

Abstract vs Keycloak

Abstract logo

Abstract

Design

Design version control and asset management

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Keycloak logo

Keycloak

Developer Tools

Open-source identity and access management server.

From
Free
Free plan
Yes

The short version

  • Abstract is a version control and asset management platform; Keycloak is an open-source IAM platform supporting OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.
  • Keycloak is free; Abstract starts at $12/mo.
  • Where Abstract falls short: built around Sketch files, so it never covered teams that moved to Figma.
  • Where Keycloak falls short: requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain.
  • Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Abstract and Keycloak actually diverge.

Attributes where Abstract and Keycloak differ
AttributeAbstractKeycloak
Pricing modelSubscriptionOpen-source
PlatformsmacOS, WebSelf-hosted, Linux, Windows, API
CategoryDesignDeveloper Tools

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).

Not yet recorded: founded for Keycloak.

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Abstract

  • Version control
  • Branching & merging
  • Asset library
  • Design tokens
  • Collaboration
  • File management
  • Comments
  • Activity tracking

Only in Keycloak

Nothing recorded that Abstract does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Abstract

  • Design systemsnot Keycloak
  • Version controlnot Keycloak
  • Asset managementnot Keycloak
  • Team collaborationnot Keycloak

Keycloak

  • Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Abstract
  • Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Abstract
  • Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Abstract
  • Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Abstract
  • Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Abstract

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Abstract

  • The product appears to be gone. Its documentation path 404s, goabstract.com no longer resolves, and abstract.com now belongs to an unrelated venture capital firm
  • Built around Sketch files, so it never covered teams that moved to Figma

Keycloak

  • Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
  • No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
  • Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
  • Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions

Pricing, plan by plan

Abstract

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 1 shared library
    • Basic version control
    • 2 team members
  • Pro$12/mo
    • Unlimited libraries
    • Full version control
    • Unlimited team members
  • Enterprise$50/mo
    • Everything in Pro
    • Advanced admin controls
    • Compliance & security

Keycloak

Free
  • Open-sourceFree
    • Full platform functionality
    • Self-hosted deployment
    • Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose Abstract if

  • You need version control.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Web.
  • You also want branching & merging.

Choose Keycloak if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.

Questions people ask

Is Abstract or Keycloak better?
Neither clearly leads. Abstract starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Abstract or Keycloak?
Abstract starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
Does Abstract or Keycloak run on more platforms?
Abstract runs on macOS, Web. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Linux, Windows, API.
Can I use Abstract for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Abstract best used for?
Abstract is most often used for design systems, version control, asset management, team collaboration. Of those, design systems and version control are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
What can Abstract do that Keycloak cannot?
Abstract covers Version control, Branching & merging, Asset library, Design tokens.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?

Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.

Source
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?

Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.

Source
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?

Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads