APIs · head to head
3scale vs Enfuce

3scale
APIs
API management platform for designing, securing, and monetizing APIs
- From
- $300/monthly
- Rated
- -

Enfuce
APIs
European issuer processor holding its own payment institution licence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3scale red Hat's managed 3scale services end on 30 June 2027, so anyone adopting the hosted option now is choosing a product with a published end date; Enfuce coverage is European, so a programme that also needs US or Asian issuing requires a separate processor and a separate integration.
- They diverge on capability: 3scale covers API Gateway, Enfuce covers Licensed issuing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3scale and Enfuce actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3scale
- API Gateway
- Developer Portal
- API Monetization
- Red Hat OpenShift
- AWS
- Azure
- Kubernetes
- Cloud support
Only in Enfuce
- Licensed issuing
- Card processing
- Tokenisation
- Spend controls
- Multi-currency programmes
- Carbon and data services
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3scale
- API gateway and lifecycle managementnot Enfuce
- Rate limiting and traffic control across API consumersnot Enfuce
- Developer portal and access key managementnot Enfuce
- Monetising APIs with usage-based plansnot Enfuce
- Hybrid deployment across on-premises and cloudnot Enfuce
Enfuce
- A European fintech launching cards without spending two quarters finding a sponsor banknot 3scale
- A corporate issuing fuel or expense cards across several EU countries on one programmenot 3scale
- A bank migrating an existing European card portfolio off a legacy processornot 3scale
- A programme that must report cardholder transaction carbon data to meet sustainability commitmentsnot 3scale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3scale
- Red Hat's managed 3scale services end on 30 June 2027, so anyone adopting the hosted option now is choosing a product with a published end date
- Sold as part of Red Hat middleware rather than standalone, and 3scale.net redirects into redhat.com
- Pricing is not published and a subscription is required for some services
Enfuce
- Coverage is European, so a programme that also needs US or Asian issuing requires a separate processor and a separate integration.
- Where Enfuce acts as the licensed issuer it takes on regulatory risk and prices accordingly, so the convenience of skipping a sponsor bank is not free.
- European interchange caps limit programme revenue far below US levels, so business cases imported from a US card model do not survive the move.
- It is a smaller supplier than Marqeta or i2c, which means less negotiating room on scheme fees and a thinner partner ecosystem around it.
- Pricing is entirely quoted with monthly minimums, so low-volume programmes carry a fixed cost that does not scale down with a slow launch.
Pricing, plan by plan
3scale
$300/monthly- Starter$300/monthly
- API gateway
- Developer portal
- Basic analytics
- Professional$750/monthly
- Advanced features
- API monetization
- Enhanced support
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Custom deployment
- Dedicated support
- Premium SLA
Enfuce
On request- Enfuce issuing and processing$undefined/year
- Per-active-card and per-transaction fees with monthly minimums
- Higher pricing where Enfuce acts as licensed issuer rather than processor only
- Interchange arrangements depend on who holds the issuing licence
Which should you pick?
Choose 3scale if
- You need api gateway.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- You also want developer portal.
Choose Enfuce if
- You need licensed issuing.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want card processing.
Questions people ask
- Is 3scale or Enfuce better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3scale starts at $300/monthly and Enfuce at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3scale or Enfuce?
- 3scale starts at $300/monthly and Enfuce at On request.
- Does 3scale or Enfuce run on more platforms?
- 3scale runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid. Enfuce runs on Web, REST API.
- What is 3scale best used for?
- 3scale is most often used for api gateway and lifecycle management, rate limiting and traffic control across api consumers, developer portal and access key management, monetising apis with usage-based plans. Of those, api gateway and lifecycle management and rate limiting and traffic control across api consumers are not what Enfuce is typically brought in for.
- What can 3scale do that Enfuce cannot?
- 3scale covers API Gateway, Developer Portal, API Monetization, Red Hat OpenShift. Enfuce covers Licensed issuing, Card processing, Tokenisation, Spend controls.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
3scale: Does Red Hat 3scale require a subscription?
Yes. The page states a subscription may be required for some services, though specific subscription details and costs are not published on this page.
SourceEnfuce: Do I need my own licence to use Enfuce?
Not necessarily. Enfuce holds Finnish payment institution authorisation and can act as issuer, or process under your own licence if you have one.
3scale: Is a trial available for 3scale?
A 'Start a trial' link is mentioned in navigation, but trial duration, included features, and limitations are not specified on this page.
SourceEnfuce: Which regions does it cover?
Europe. It is not a route to issuing cards in the United States or Asia.
3scale: When will Red Hat 3scale end support?
Red Hat 3scale API Management maintenance and managed services will end on June 30, 2027. Customers should plan migrations accordingly.
SourceEnfuce: How does interchange work?
Who holds the issuing licence determines who receives interchange, so the licensing choice and the revenue model are the same decision.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- 3scale vs Sanity
- 3scale vs Appwrite
- 3scale vs Hasura
- 3scale vs PocketBase
- 3scale vs Apigee
- 3scale vs WSO2 API Manager
- 3scale vs Akana
- 3scale vs Boomi API Management
- 3scale vs TIBCO Mashery
- 3scale vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- 3scale vs Kong
- 3scale vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- 3scale vs Paymentology
- 3scale vs Q2 Digital Banking
- 3scale vs Solaris
- 3scale vs Stainless
- 3scale vs Strapi
- 3scale vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- 3scale vs Marqeta
- 3scale vs i2c
- 3scale vs Weavr
- 3scale vs Tink
- 3scale vs Highnote
- 3scale vs Lithic
- 3scale vs Thredd
- 3scale vs Episode Six
- 3scale vs Tribe Payments
- 3scale vs Enable Banking
- 3scale vs Salt Edge
- 3scale vs Skyflow
- 3scale vs Yodlee
- 3scale vs Backbase
- 3scale vs Griffin
- 3scale vs Stoplight
- Enfuce vs Sanity
- Enfuce vs Appwrite
- Enfuce vs Hasura
- Enfuce vs PocketBase
- Enfuce vs Apigee
- Enfuce vs WSO2 API Manager
- Enfuce vs Akana
- Enfuce vs Boomi API Management
- Enfuce vs TIBCO Mashery
- Enfuce vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Enfuce vs Kong
- Enfuce vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Enfuce vs Paymentology
- Enfuce vs Q2 Digital Banking
- Enfuce vs Solaris
- Enfuce vs Stainless
- Enfuce vs Strapi
- Enfuce vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Enfuce vs Marqeta
- Enfuce vs i2c
- Enfuce vs Weavr
- Enfuce vs Tink
- Enfuce vs Highnote
- Enfuce vs Lithic
- Enfuce vs Thredd
- Enfuce vs Episode Six
- Enfuce vs Tribe Payments
- Enfuce vs Enable Banking
- Enfuce vs Salt Edge
- Enfuce vs Skyflow
- Enfuce vs Yodlee
- Enfuce vs Backbase
- Enfuce vs Griffin
- Enfuce vs Stoplight
