Software · head to head
3D-Coat vs Pico-8

Pico-8
Software
A fantasy console for making, sharing and playing tiny games
- From
- $14.99/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3D-Coat split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence; Pico-8 extremely limited display resolution of 128x128 pixels with 16-colour palette
- They diverge on capability: 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, Pico-8 covers Pixel art editor.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3D-Coat and Pico-8 actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (one-time), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting
- Surface sculpting
- Retopology
- UV mapping
- Texture painting
- PBR materials
- Smart materials
- Baking
Only in Pico-8
- Pixel art editor
- Music composer
- Lua scripting
- Built-in palette
- Sprite system
- Map editor
- Code editor
- Game cartridges
Both cover
- Windows support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting from a digital clay blocknot Pico-8
- Retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshesnot Pico-8
- UV mapping and PBR texturingnot Pico-8
- Preparing print-ready models for 3D printingnot Pico-8
- Node-based material authoring on the GPUnot Pico-8
Pico-8
- Retro-style indie game developmentnot 3D-Coat
- Educational game programmingnot 3D-Coat
- Game jam participationnot 3D-Coat
- Pixel art game creation with strict creative constraintsnot 3D-Coat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3D-Coat
- Split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence
- Pricing is not published on the product pages
- Licences are sold node-locked or floating, so moving a seat between machines depends on which was bought
Pico-8
- Extremely limited display resolution of 128x128 pixels with 16-colour palette
- Cart size capped at 32 kilobytes
- Only 256 sprites of 8x8 pixels available
- Map limited to 128x32 tiles
- Monophonic sound synthesis with 4-channel chip synthesis only
- Lua programming language exclusively; no other language support
Pricing, plan by plan
3D-Coat
$29/month- Amateur$99/month
- Non-commercial use
- Professional$379/month
- Full commercial license
- Floating$568/month
- Network licensing
Pico-8
$14.99/one-timeNo published plan breakdown. See the Pico-8 review.
Which should you pick?
Choose 3D-Coat if
- You need voxel sculpting.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want surface sculpting.
Choose Pico-8 if
- You need pixel art editor.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Raspberry Pi.
- You also want music composer.
Questions people ask
- Is 3D-Coat or Pico-8 better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month and Pico-8 at $14.99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3D-Coat or Pico-8?
- 3D-Coat starts at $29/month and Pico-8 at $14.99/one-time.
- Does 3D-Coat or Pico-8 run on more platforms?
- 3D-Coat runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Pico-8 runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Raspberry Pi.
- What is 3D-Coat best used for?
- 3D-Coat is most often used for voxel sculpting from a digital clay block, retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes, uv mapping and pbr texturing, preparing print-ready models for 3d printing. Of those, voxel sculpting from a digital clay block and retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes are not what Pico-8 is typically brought in for.
- What can 3D-Coat do that Pico-8 cannot?
- 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, Surface sculpting, Retopology, UV mapping. Pico-8 covers Pixel art editor, Music composer, Lua scripting, Built-in palette. Both handle Windows support, Linux support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- 3D-Coat vs Enscape
- 3D-Coat vs V-Ray
- 3D-Coat vs FreeCAD
- 3D-Coat vs KeyShot
- 3D-Coat vs Lumion
- 3D-Coat vs Houdini
- 3D-Coat vs Arnold
- 3D-Coat vs Inventor
- 3D-Coat vs Mudbox
- 3D-Coat vs Corona Renderer
- 3D-Coat vs D5 Render
- 3D-Coat vs Twinmotion
- 3D-Coat vs LightWave 3D
- 3D-Coat vs OpenSCAD
- 3D-Coat vs PrusaSlicer
- 3D-Coat vs Siemens NX
- 3D-Coat vs ZBrush
- 3D-Coat vs Alibre Design
- 3D-Coat vs DragonBones
- 3D-Coat vs Unity
- 3D-Coat vs Aseprite
- 3D-Coat vs Godot Engine
- 3D-Coat vs Cascadeur
- 3D-Coat vs Construct 3
- 3D-Coat vs GameMaker Studio 2
- 3D-Coat vs Mixamo
- 3D-Coat vs Substance 3D Painter
- 3D-Coat vs Adventure Game Studio
- 3D-Coat vs AppGameKit
- 3D-Coat vs Armory3D
- 3D-Coat vs Bevy
- 3D-Coat vs Buildbox
- 3D-Coat vs Clickteam Fusion
- 3D-Coat vs Cocos2d-x
- 3D-Coat vs CryEngine
- 3D-Coat vs Defold
- Pico-8 vs Enscape
- Pico-8 vs V-Ray
- Pico-8 vs FreeCAD
- Pico-8 vs KeyShot
- Pico-8 vs Lumion
- Pico-8 vs Houdini
- Pico-8 vs Arnold
- Pico-8 vs Inventor
- Pico-8 vs Mudbox
- Pico-8 vs Corona Renderer
- Pico-8 vs D5 Render
- Pico-8 vs Twinmotion
- Pico-8 vs LightWave 3D
- Pico-8 vs OpenSCAD
- Pico-8 vs PrusaSlicer
- Pico-8 vs Siemens NX
- Pico-8 vs ZBrush
- Pico-8 vs Alibre Design
- Pico-8 vs DragonBones
- Pico-8 vs Unity
- Pico-8 vs Aseprite
- Pico-8 vs Godot Engine
- Pico-8 vs Cascadeur
- Pico-8 vs Construct 3
- Pico-8 vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Pico-8 vs Mixamo
- Pico-8 vs Substance 3D Painter
- Pico-8 vs Adventure Game Studio
- Pico-8 vs AppGameKit
- Pico-8 vs Armory3D
- Pico-8 vs Bevy
- Pico-8 vs Buildbox
- Pico-8 vs Clickteam Fusion
- Pico-8 vs Cocos2d-x
- Pico-8 vs CryEngine
- Pico-8 vs Defold

