Software · head to head
3D-Coat vs Armory3D
The short version
- Only Armory3D has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: 3D-Coat split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence; Armory3D compiled binaries are sold to fund the project while the source code itself is free to build from scratch
- They diverge on capability: 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, Armory3D covers Blender integration.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3D-Coat and Armory3D actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting
- Surface sculpting
- Retopology
- UV mapping
- Texture painting
- PBR materials
- Smart materials
- Baking
Only in Armory3D
- Blender integration
- 3D graphics rendering
- Physics engine (Bullet)
- Audio system
- Haxe scripting
- Particle effects
- Skeletal animation
- Material system
Both cover
- Blender
- Windows support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting from a digital clay blocknot Armory3D
- Retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshesnot Armory3D
- UV mapping and PBR texturingnot Armory3D
- Preparing print-ready models for 3D printingnot Armory3D
- Node-based material authoring on the GPUnot Armory3D
Armory3D
- 3D game developmentnot 3D-Coat
- Blender-based gamesnot 3D-Coat
- Web gamesnot 3D-Coat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3D-Coat
- Split into separate products, so 3DCoatTextura covers texturing only and the full sculpting toolset needs the complete 3DCoat licence
- Pricing is not published on the product pages
- Licences are sold node-locked or floating, so moving a seat between machines depends on which was bought
Armory3D
- Compiled binaries are sold to fund the project while the source code itself is free to build from scratch
Pricing, plan by plan
3D-Coat
$29/month- Amateur$99/month
- Non-commercial use
- Professional$379/month
- Full commercial license
- Floating$568/month
- Network licensing
Armory3D
Free- FreeFree
- Full engine
- Blender integration
- 3D graphics
Which should you pick?
Choose 3D-Coat if
- You need voxel sculpting.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want surface sculpting.
Choose Armory3D if
- You need blender integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Html5, Android.
- You also want 3d graphics rendering.
Questions people ask
- Is 3D-Coat or Armory3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month and Armory3D at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3D-Coat or Armory3D?
- Armory3D has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for 3D-Coat and Free for Armory3D.
- Does 3D-Coat or Armory3D run on more platforms?
- 3D-Coat runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Armory3D runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Html5, Android.
- Can I use Armory3D for free?
- Yes. Armory3D has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month.
- What is 3D-Coat best used for?
- 3D-Coat is most often used for voxel sculpting from a digital clay block, retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes, uv mapping and pbr texturing, preparing print-ready models for 3d printing. Of those, voxel sculpting from a digital clay block and retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes are not what Armory3D is typically brought in for.
- What can 3D-Coat do that Armory3D cannot?
- 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, Surface sculpting, Retopology, UV mapping. Armory3D covers Blender integration, 3D graphics rendering, Physics engine (Bullet), Audio system. Both handle Blender, Windows support, Linux support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- 3D-Coat vs Enscape
- 3D-Coat vs V-Ray
- 3D-Coat vs FreeCAD
- 3D-Coat vs KeyShot
- 3D-Coat vs Lumion
- 3D-Coat vs Houdini
- 3D-Coat vs Arnold
- 3D-Coat vs Inventor
- 3D-Coat vs Mudbox
- 3D-Coat vs Corona Renderer
- 3D-Coat vs D5 Render
- 3D-Coat vs Twinmotion
- 3D-Coat vs LightWave 3D
- 3D-Coat vs OpenSCAD
- 3D-Coat vs PrusaSlicer
- 3D-Coat vs Siemens NX
- 3D-Coat vs ZBrush
- 3D-Coat vs Alibre Design
- 3D-Coat vs DragonBones
- 3D-Coat vs Unity
- 3D-Coat vs Aseprite
- 3D-Coat vs Godot Engine
- 3D-Coat vs Cascadeur
- 3D-Coat vs Construct 3
- 3D-Coat vs GameMaker Studio 2
- 3D-Coat vs Mixamo
- 3D-Coat vs Pico-8
- 3D-Coat vs Substance 3D Painter
- 3D-Coat vs Adventure Game Studio
- 3D-Coat vs AppGameKit
- 3D-Coat vs Bevy
- 3D-Coat vs Buildbox
- 3D-Coat vs Clickteam Fusion
- 3D-Coat vs Cocos2d-x
- 3D-Coat vs CryEngine
- 3D-Coat vs Defold
- Armory3D vs Enscape
- Armory3D vs V-Ray
- Armory3D vs FreeCAD
- Armory3D vs KeyShot
- Armory3D vs Lumion
- Armory3D vs Houdini
- Armory3D vs Arnold
- Armory3D vs Inventor
- Armory3D vs Mudbox
- Armory3D vs Corona Renderer
- Armory3D vs D5 Render
- Armory3D vs Twinmotion
- Armory3D vs LightWave 3D
- Armory3D vs OpenSCAD
- Armory3D vs PrusaSlicer
- Armory3D vs Siemens NX
- Armory3D vs ZBrush
- Armory3D vs Alibre Design
- Armory3D vs DragonBones
- Armory3D vs Unity
- Armory3D vs Aseprite
- Armory3D vs Godot Engine
- Armory3D vs Cascadeur
- Armory3D vs Construct 3
- Armory3D vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Armory3D vs Mixamo
- Armory3D vs Pico-8
- Armory3D vs Substance 3D Painter
- Armory3D vs Adventure Game Studio
- Armory3D vs AppGameKit
- Armory3D vs Bevy
- Armory3D vs Buildbox
- Armory3D vs Clickteam Fusion
- Armory3D vs Cocos2d-x
- Armory3D vs CryEngine
- Armory3D vs Defold


