Percyvs
Applitools


Applitools: If you want AI-based visual comparison with fewer false positives and are willing to pay more per checkpoint

Visual regression testing owned by BrowserStack, with a permanent free tier for low screenshot volume
As of 1 September 2026, Percy is free to use. A screenshot-diffing visual regression tool, now owned by BrowserStack after its acquisition, offering a genuinely usable free tier of 5,000 screenshots a month before paid plans begin. Softwr lists it under Testing. Percy is made by BrowserStack, available on Web.
Overview
Percy captures screenshots of web pages or components during a test run, typically driven from Cypress, Playwright, Selenium or Storybook, and flags visual differences against an approved baseline for a reviewer to accept or reject. It is a pixel-comparison approach rather than the AI-based perceptual comparison Applitools uses, which keeps its per-screenshot cost lower but generally produces more rendering-noise false positives that a reviewer has to triage. The ownership fact worth knowing is that Percy was acquired by BrowserStack and now operates as one of several separately priced modules alongside BrowserStack's core device and browser testing, Test Management and Accessibility products. Buyers evaluating BrowserStack's headline device cloud pricing should not assume Percy is included; it is billed on its own screenshot volume, and stacking Percy, Accessibility Testing and Test Observability onto a core BrowserStack contract is reported to add a meaningful percentage to total contract value. Buyers are teams wanting visual regression testing at a lower cost than Applitools, often already using BrowserStack for device testing and adding Percy as a natural extension, or teams starting on the free tier for a low-traffic project before scaling into a paid plan. The trade-off against Applitools is the same trade-off as any pixel-diffing tool: cheaper per screenshot, but more false positives from rendering noise that a reviewer has to manually dismiss over time.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Percy.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Applitools: If you want AI-based visual comparison with fewer false positives and are willing to pay more per checkpoint


BrowserStack: If you want the core device and browser testing product Percy is sold alongside


Cypress: If your priority is functional end-to-end testing with visual checks as a secondary concern
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Free
Free
Percy
On request
Capabilities
Screenshot diffing
Pixel-level comparison of rendered pages or components against an approved baseline
Framework integrations
Native support for Cypress, Playwright, Selenium and Storybook test runners
Responsive and cross-browser snapshots
Captures visual state across multiple viewport sizes and browsers in one test run
Review workflow
Web dashboard for approving or rejecting flagged visual differences before merge
Build history
Stores prior builds and diffs for audit and comparison over time
BrowserStack platform integration
Sits alongside BrowserStack device testing, Accessibility and Test Management as a separately billed module
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes for up to 5,000 screenshots a month with unlimited users and projects; beyond that it is a paid, quote-priced module.
No, it is billed separately by screenshot volume, not bundled into core device testing plans.
Percy uses pixel-based diffing, which is generally cheaper per screenshot but produces more false positives than Applitools' AI-based perceptual comparison.
Keep looking
AI-based visual regression testing, priced on component and page checkpoint volume
JavaScript end-to-end testing framework with browser-based runner and cloud service
Test case management priced per user, owned by the Idera software group
Cloud device and browser testing platform, priced per plan tier with unlimited testing minutes rather than metered by the minute
Commercial low-code test automation platform built on Appium and Selenium, priced per seat plus separate cloud session add-ons
JavaScript testing framework, moved from Meta to the OpenJS Foundation in 2022
Test management platform priced per user with a 10-licence minimum on its top tier
Native test management for Jira, licensed per Jira user rather than per tester
The default Java unit testing framework, developed by an independent team with commercial support available via OpenElements
Behaviour-driven development testing framework that returned to community ownership after nine years under SmartBear
Managed end to end test coverage where the vendor writes and maintains your Playwright suite
Commercial desktop, web and mobile test automation studio with concurrent-user licensing and no published pricing
Feature flags tied to a metrics pipeline that attributes production impact to each release, now Harness FME
Model based test automation for enterprise applications, with deep SAP and mainframe coverage
Cloud device and browser testing platform, priced per plan tier with unlimited testing minutes rather than metered by the minute
Open source mobile automation framework hosted under the OpenJS Foundation with copyright assigned to the foundation
Open source Node.js browser and mobile automation framework, governed under the OpenJS Foundation with Sauce Labs as a premium sponsor
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Percy, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
JavaScript testing framework, moved from Meta to the OpenJS Foundation in 2022
Open source, no licence feeOpen source end-to-end testing framework for React Native apps, built and maintained by Wix
Open source, no licence feeThe default Java unit testing framework, developed by an independent team with commercial support available via OpenElements
Open source, no licence feeAI-based visual regression testing, priced on component and page checkpoint volume
Per month by checkpoint volumeCommercial low-code test automation platform built on Appium and Selenium, priced per seat plus separate cloud session add-ons
Per seat per month, plus separate per-session cloud execution chargesBehaviour-driven development testing framework that returned to community ownership after nine years under SmartBear
Open source, no licence feeOpen source mobile automation framework hosted under the OpenJS Foundation with copyright assigned to the foundation
Open source, no licence fee