mpvvs
IINA


IINA: If you want the same mpv engine wrapped in a full native Mac graphical interface

Free open source command line video player with no graphical interface, built for scripting and precision
As of 1 September 2026, mpv is free to use. A free, open source, cross-platform media player controlled from the command line or a minimal on-screen overlay, with no menus, library browser or window chrome by default. Softwr lists it under Entertainment. mpv is made by mpv (open source project), available on Mac, Windows, Linux.
Overview
mpv plays essentially any video or audio format through a highly configurable playback engine, controlled by command line flags, keyboard shortcuts and a Lua scripting interface, with configuration stored in plain text files. It has no application window chrome beyond the video itself, no built in library, no browsing interface and no settings panel in the conventional sense. The distinguishing fact against IINA and Infuse is the complete absence of a GUI. IINA wraps this same mpv engine in a full native macOS interface with menus, gestures and preferences; Infuse wraps comparable playback in a cross-platform app with a browsable library and Apple TV support. mpv gives that up entirely in exchange for being scriptable, embeddable in other tools, and controllable entirely through text configuration and the command line, which makes it popular as a backend for other media software rather than as an end-user application in its own right. Buyers, in the sense of adopters, are developers, people who script their media workflows, and users on Linux where a lightweight, scriptable player is valued more than a polished interface. The trade-off is stark: someone who wants to click through a library, browse artwork or use Apple TV needs IINA or Infuse instead, since mpv on its own offers none of that.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about mpv.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


IINA: If you want the same mpv engine wrapped in a full native Mac graphical interface


Infuse: If you want a browsable library across Apple TV, iOS and Mac rather than a command line tool


qBittorrent: If your need is downloading media files rather than playing them back
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
mpv
Free
Capabilities
Command line control
Launched and controlled with flags, keyboard shortcuts and typed commands
Lua and JavaScript scripting
Extends and automates playback behaviour through user scripts
Plain text configuration
All settings stored in editable config files rather than a GUI panel
Cross-platform
Runs on macOS, Windows, Linux and BSD from the same codebase
Minimal on-screen overlay
A basic progress bar and volume indicator, with no menus or library browser
Embeddable engine
Used as the playback backend inside other applications, including IINA
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes, entirely, and it is open source with no paid tier of any kind.
Not by default. It shows the video and a minimal overlay, but there are no menus, library or settings panel; IINA is the graphical Mac interface built on the same engine.
It can play many stream types via command line arguments, but it has no built in browsable network or cloud library the way Infuse does.
Keep looking
Free open source Mac video player built on mpv, with a native macOS interface
Paid media player for Apple TV, iPhone, iPad and Mac with strong network share and cloud library streaming
The world's most open and advanced real-time 3D creation tool
Free ad-supported streaming from Roku, with an optional paid live TV add-on layer
The world's most open and advanced real-time 3D creation tool
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for mpv, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Paid media player for Apple TV, iPhone, iPad and Mac with strong network share and cloud library streaming
Per user per monthCheap entertainment-only live TV streaming with no sports and no local broadcast channels
Per household per month, single planTicket resale marketplace charging both buyers and sellers, with combined fees often a large share of face value
Free to browse, two sided transaction fees on buyers and sellersSports-first live TV streaming bundle with regional sports networks and a cloud DVR
Per household per month, tiered plansFree ad-supported streaming from Roku, with an optional paid live TV add-on layer
Free, ad-supported; individual paid channel add-onsFree open source Mac video player built on mpv, with a native macOS interface
Open source, no licence feeCable-replacement live TV streaming with local channels, RSNs and the widest premium channel tiers
Per household per month, tiered plans