Testing · pricing
QA Wolf pricing
QA Wolf publishes a single tier. Below is what it costs, what it covers, and how that compares with the testing tools listed alongside it.
As of 31 August 2026, QA Wolf pricing is on request. Figures are the vendor's list prices as recorded on this page's last check; the vendor's site is the final word.
- Entry price
- On request
- Model
- Quote
- Tiers
- 1
- Free tier
- Not on record
QA Wolf plans, side by side
Every published tier in ascending order of price, with the number of features each one lists. An absence here means the record does not itemise it, not that the tier lacks it.
| Plan | Price | Features listed | Step up from the tier below |
|---|---|---|---|
| QA Wolf | On request | 2 | Entry tier |
What the product covers
The full QA Wolf feature record, grouped as the catalogue groups it. This is the product as a whole; the record does not map every feature onto a specific tier.
Other
- Tests written for you
- Human failure triage
- Parallel hosted execution
- Coverage targets
- Portable Playwright output
- CI and issue integration
People bring QA Wolf in for a startup with no qa function that needs regression coverage before a release cadence moves to daily, engineering teams where developers currently spend a day a week fixing broken end to end tests, companies that tried a record and replay tool and abandoned it when maintenance overtook the benefit, organisations that want automated coverage but cannot recruit automation engineers in their market. If that is not the job you are buying for, the alternatives to QA Wolf are worth a look before you commit to a tier.
How that compares in Testing
Too few testing tools in this directory publish a starting price to quote a meaningful median, so the table below is a like-for-like list rather than a ranking.
| Tool | Entry price | Model | Rated | Head to head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QA Wolf (this page) | On request | quote | - | |
| Jest | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs QA Wolf |
| Cucumber | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs QA Wolf |
| Percy | Free | Freemium, paid tiers by screenshot volume | - | vs QA Wolf |
| Detox | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs QA Wolf |
| Appium | Free | Open source, no licence fee | - | vs QA Wolf |
| PractiTest | On request | Per user per month, yearly minimum on Corporate tier | - | vs QA Wolf |
Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry, they are not reviews hosted on Softwr. How each figure is used is set out on the QA Wolf badges page.
Before you pay for QA Wolf
Three things this page cannot tell you, and all three change the bill. The record carries a price and a billing period but not the unit - per-seat and flat-rate pricing are indistinguishable in this data, so a five-person team may be looking at five times the figure above. It carries no annual rate, so any discount for paying yearly is not something this page can quote. And it carries no trial length.
What it can tell you is the shape of the ladder: a single tier at On request. With no free tier on record, the cheapest way to answer the rest is to compare QA Wolf against the tools that do have one before committing.
QA Wolf runs on web, ios, android, and is published by QA Wolf of San Francisco, California, United States. The full record is on the QA Wolf review, and the rest of the category is under best testing tools.
QA Wolf pricing questions
- How much does QA Wolf cost?
- QA Wolf publishes a single tier, QA Wolf, at On request.
- Does QA Wolf have a free plan?
- Not on the record we hold: QA Wolf is listed as quote. Whether a free trial is offered is not something this record captures, so check the vendor's site.
- Which testing tools can I use without paying?
- 6 of the 8 testing tools listed alongside QA Wolf have a free tier: Jest, Cucumber, Percy, Detox, Appium.
- What am I actually paying for with QA Wolf?
- The record lists 6 features across 1 area: other. In practice it is brought in for a startup with no qa function that needs regression coverage before a release cadence moves to daily, engineering teams where developers currently spend a day a week fixing broken end to end tests, companies that tried a record and replay tool and abandoned it when maintenance overtook the benefit.
- Does QA Wolf charge per user?
- The record carries a price and a billing period for each of its 1 tiers, but not the unit that price is charged in. Per-seat and flat-rate billing look identical in this data, so check the vendor's page before budgeting for a team.
- Are these QA Wolf prices current?
- They are what the catalogue entry holds, refreshed when the entry is. Vendors change pricing without notice and nobody at Softwr re-verifies each tier by hand, so treat this as a structured summary and the vendor's own pricing page as the authority.
- What should I compare QA Wolf against before paying?
- The closest testing tools in this directory are Jest, Cucumber, Percy, Detox. Each has a side-by-side comparison with QA Wolf covering price, platforms and features.