Weather · pricing
Meteomatics pricing
Meteomatics publishes 2 tiers. Below is each one, what it adds over the tier beneath it, and where the ladder stops being worth climbing for most people.
As of 30 August 2026, Meteomatics pricing is €150/month across 2 published tiers. Figures are the vendor's list prices as recorded on this page's last check; the vendor's site is the final word.
- Entry price
- €150/month
- Model
- Subscription
- Tiers
- 2
- Free tier
- Not on record
Meteomatics plans, side by side
Every published tier in ascending order of price, with the number of features each one lists. An absence here means the record does not itemise it, not that the tier lacks it.
| Plan | Price | Features listed | Step up from the tier below |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | €150/month | 3 | Entry tier |
| Professional | €500/month | 3 | +$350/month, 3 more features |
What each tier adds
The set difference between each tier's feature list and the one beneath it. Where a tier lists nothing new, the vendor has either stopped repeating the inherited list or the tier raises limits rather than adding capability, the record does not distinguish the two, so this page does not either.
Starter
€150/monthThe entry tier. It covers api access, basic data, support.
Professional
€500/monthOver Starter, this tier adds:
- Full API
- Historical data
- Priority support
What the product covers
The full Meteomatics feature record, grouped as the catalogue groups it. This is the product as a whole; the record does not map every feature onto a specific tier.
Other
- Weather API
- Drone measurements
- High-resolution data
- Historical archive
- Custom models
Integrations
- REST API
- Python SDK
- Enterprise systems
Platform
- Api support
- Web support
People bring Meteomatics in for professional work, content creation. If that is not the job you are buying for, the alternatives to Meteomatics are worth a look before you commit to a tier.
How that compares in Weather
Across the 3 weather tools in this directory that publish a starting price, the median entry point is $149/month. Meteomatics starts at €150/month, which puts it in line with the middle of its category.
| Tool | Entry price | Model | Rated | Head to head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meteomatics (this page) | €150/month | subscription | - | |
| Zoom Earth | Free | Free, no account required | - | vs Meteomatics |
| BreezoMeter | Free | quote | - | vs Meteomatics |
| Gro Intelligence | $29/month | subscription | - | vs Meteomatics |
| EPA AirNow | Free | free | - | vs Meteomatics |
| Awair | $149/one-time | one-time | - | vs Meteomatics |
| IQAir | $399/one-time | - | - | vs Meteomatics |
Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry, they are not reviews hosted on Softwr. How each figure is used is set out on the Meteomatics badges page.
Before you pay for Meteomatics
Three things this page cannot tell you, and all three change the bill. The record carries a price and a billing period but not the unit - per-seat and flat-rate pricing are indistinguishable in this data, so a five-person team may be looking at five times the figure above. It carries no annual rate, so any discount for paying yearly is not something this page can quote. And it carries no trial length.
What it can tell you is the shape of the ladder: 2 tiers between €150/month and €500/month, with the jump itemised above. With no free tier on record, the cheapest way to answer the rest is to compare Meteomatics against the tools that do have one before committing.
Meteomatics runs on web, api, and is published by Meteomatics AG of St. Gallen, Switzerland. The full record is on the Meteomatics review, and the rest of the category is under best weather tools.
Meteomatics pricing questions
- How much does Meteomatics cost?
- Meteomatics publishes 2 tiers, from €150/month for Starter up to €500/month for Professional. The cheapest paid tier is €150/month.
- Does Meteomatics have a free plan?
- Not on the record we hold: Meteomatics is listed as subscription. Whether a free trial is offered is not something this record captures, so check the vendor's site.
- What is the difference between Starter and Professional on Meteomatics?
- Professional costs €500/month against €150/month, and adds full api, historical data, priority support.
- Is the Professional plan on Meteomatics worth it?
- That depends entirely on whether you need what it adds, which on the published record is full api, historical data, priority support. It costs €500/month against €150/month for Starter. Softwr has not used either tier, so this page can tell you what changes, not whether it is worth the difference to you.
- Is Meteomatics expensive for a weather tool?
- It starts in line with the middle of its category. Across the 3 weather tools in this directory that publish a starting price, the median entry point is $149/month; Meteomatics starts at €150/month.
- Which weather tools can I use without paying?
- 4 of the 8 weather tools listed alongside Meteomatics have a free tier: Zoom Earth, EPA AirNow, AirVisual, Ambient Weather Network.
- What am I actually paying for with Meteomatics?
- The record lists 10 features across 3 areas: other, integrations, platform. In practice it is brought in for professional work, content creation.
- Does Meteomatics charge per user?
- The record carries a price and a billing period for each of its 2 tiers, but not the unit that price is charged in. Per-seat and flat-rate billing look identical in this data, so check the vendor's page before budgeting for a team.
- Are these Meteomatics prices current?
- They are what the catalogue entry holds, refreshed when the entry is. Vendors change pricing without notice and nobody at Softwr re-verifies each tier by hand, so treat this as a structured summary and the vendor's own pricing page as the authority.
- What should I compare Meteomatics against before paying?
- The closest weather tools in this directory are Zoom Earth, BreezoMeter, Gro Intelligence, EPA AirNow. Each has a side-by-side comparison with Meteomatics covering price, platforms and features.
