Softwr

Education · head to head

SkySafari vs Veracross

SkySafari logo

SkySafari

Education

Astronomy app sold in three tiered editions, from a cheap star chart to telescope control

From
On request
Rated
-
Veracross logo

Veracross

Education

Single database student information, admissions, billing and fundraising system for independent schools

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: SkySafari the three tiers are separate purchases, so upgrading from Basic to Plus or Pro later means buying again rather than paying the price difference.; Veracross the product is built for fee charging schools, so districts needing state compliance reporting, federal programme tracking and free and reduced lunch workflows will find those either absent or bolted on.
  • They diverge on capability: SkySafari covers Tiered editions, Veracross covers Single relational database.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which SkySafari and Veracross actually diverge.

Attributes where SkySafari and Veracross differ
AttributeSkySafariVeracross
Pricing modelOne-time purchase per tierquote
PlatformsiOS, Android, macOSWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Education).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in SkySafari

  • Tiered editions
  • Telescope control
  • Large object catalogue
  • Event finder
  • Observing log
  • Time control

Only in Veracross

  • Single relational database
  • Admissions and enrolment
  • Tuition billing
  • Development and alumni
  • Parent and pupil portals
  • Query and report engine

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

SkySafari

  • An amateur astronomer with a motorised telescope mount who needs live control from a phone or tabletnot Veracross
  • A serious hobbyist who wants a deep-sky catalogue far larger than a casual sky map app providesnot Veracross
  • Someone planning an observing session who wants an event finder for conjunctions and eclipsesnot Veracross
  • A buyer choosing Basic first as a cheap star chart with no intention of telescope controlnot Veracross

Veracross

  • An independent school reconciling a student information system, a billing platform and a fundraising database by hand every termnot SkySafari
  • A school where the advancement office needs alumni giving history joined to the original family and pupil recordnot SkySafari
  • International schools that need one system across admissions, academics and fee collection in multiple currenciesnot SkySafari
  • Schools whose board asks for a single report joining enrolment yield, financial aid spend and net tuition revenuenot SkySafari

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

SkySafari

  • The three tiers are separate purchases, so upgrading from Basic to Plus or Pro later means buying again rather than paying the price difference.
  • Even the Basic tier costs more than a comparable free or freemium app like Star Walk 2 for a casual user.
  • Telescope control only works with compatible motorised mounts, so it is useless to someone with a manual telescope or no telescope at all.
  • Pricing fluctuates with frequent promotional sales, so the list price is not a reliable guide to what most buyers actually pay.
  • The interface, particularly on the Pro tier, has a steeper learning curve than a simple AR sky map app aimed at casual users.

Veracross

  • The product is built for fee charging schools, so districts needing state compliance reporting, federal programme tracking and free and reduced lunch workflows will find those either absent or bolted on.
  • A single database means modules cannot be replaced individually. If the learning management or the donor module is weaker than a specialist competitor, the school either accepts it or breaks the integration argument that justified the purchase.
  • Implementation is long because every historic record from three or four legacy systems must be merged into one schema, and schools routinely underestimate the internal staff time this consumes.
  • Configuration depth means the system rewards a school that has a dedicated database administrator and punishes one that does not, so small schools can end up paying for capability they cannot operate.
  • Reporting is capable but query driven, and staff without that skill fall back on asking the one person who has it, which creates a single point of dependency inside the school.

Pricing, plan by plan

SkySafari

On request
  • SkySafari Basic$4.99/one-time
    • Core star chart
    • Modest object catalogue
    • No telescope control
  • SkySafari Plus$14.99/one-time
    • About 2.5 million stars and 32,000 deep-sky objects
    • Telescope control
    • Event finder and observing log
  • SkySafari Pro$29.99/one-time
    • Largest catalogue tier
    • Telescope control
    • Advanced observation planning tools

Veracross

On request
  • Veracross$undefined/year
    • Quoted by pupil count and modules taken
    • Implementation and data migration charged separately
    • Multi-year agreements standard

Which should you pick?

Choose SkySafari if

  • You need tiered editions.
  • You work on iOS, Android, macOS.
  • You also want telescope control.

Choose Veracross if

  • You need single relational database.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want admissions and enrolment.

Questions people ask

Is SkySafari or Veracross better?
Neither clearly leads. SkySafari starts at On request and Veracross at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, SkySafari or Veracross?
SkySafari starts at On request and Veracross at On request.
Does SkySafari or Veracross run on more platforms?
SkySafari runs on iOS, Android, macOS. Veracross runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is SkySafari best used for?
SkySafari is most often used for an amateur astronomer with a motorised telescope mount who needs live control from a phone or tablet, a serious hobbyist who wants a deep-sky catalogue far larger than a casual sky map app provides, someone planning an observing session who wants an event finder for conjunctions and eclipses, a buyer choosing basic first as a cheap star chart with no intention of telescope control. Of those, an amateur astronomer with a motorised telescope mount who needs live control from a phone or tablet and a serious hobbyist who wants a deep-sky catalogue far larger than a casual sky map app provides are not what Veracross is typically brought in for.
What can SkySafari do that Veracross cannot?
SkySafari covers Tiered editions, Telescope control, Large object catalogue, Event finder. Veracross covers Single relational database, Admissions and enrolment, Tuition billing, Development and alumni.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

SkySafari: What is the difference between Basic, Plus and Pro?

Basic is a simple star chart, Plus adds a much larger catalogue and telescope control, and Pro adds an even larger catalogue and advanced planning tools.

Veracross: Is Veracross suitable for a public school district?

Generally no. It is designed around tuition, financial aid and advancement, and lacks the state reporting depth that a public district is legally required to produce.

SkySafari: Can I upgrade from Basic to Plus later?

Not as a discounted upgrade; each tier is sold as a separate one-time purchase.

Veracross: Does it replace a separate fundraising database?

Yes, that is the main reason schools buy it. Development records sit in the same database as admissions and academics, removing the constituent reconciliation between a student information system and a donor product.

SkySafari: Does it work with any telescope?

Only telescopes with compatible motorised mounts and a supported connection method can be controlled from the app.

Veracross: How long does migration take?

Plan on a full academic year of overlap. The work is not loading the current roster, it is merging historic academic, billing and giving records that previously lived in separate systems with different family identifiers.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads