No-Code · head to head
OutSystems vs Thunkable

OutSystems
No-Code
Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Thunkable
No-Code
No-code, drag-and-drop mobile app builder priced by AI tokens and project counts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Thunkable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OutSystems application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.; Thunkable every paid tier is metered by a monthly AI token allowance, so heavy use of the AI assistant, which is the tool's main productivity feature, can be exhausted well before a billing period ends.
- They diverge on capability: OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Thunkable covers Block-based logic editor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OutSystems and Thunkable actually diverge.
| Attribute | OutSystems | Thunkable |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packs | Per month, tiered by AI token allowance and project count |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (No-Code).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OutSystems
- Visual application modelling
- Generated deployable code
- One-click deployment
- AI-assisted development
- Application Object governance
- Prebuilt integrations
Only in Thunkable
- Block-based logic editor
- Native compilation
- AI app assistant
- Component marketplace
- Live testing
- Custom branding
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OutSystems
- An enterprise replacing custom .NET or Java application development with a governed low-code platform at scalenot Thunkable
- A company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal usersnot Thunkable
- An IT department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtimenot Thunkable
- An organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teamsnot Thunkable
Thunkable
- A non-developer or founder prototyping an app idea before hiring an engineernot OutSystems
- An educator teaching app-building concepts without requiring students to write codenot OutSystems
- A small business needing a simple internal or customer-facing app with modest logicnot OutSystems
- A hobbyist building a single published app who does not need more than one live app slotnot OutSystems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OutSystems
- Application Objects grow with every screen, table and API an app gains, so a successful app that keeps adding features can push the account into AO overage charges that were not modelled at initial budget time.
- Internal users are sold in packs of 100 and external users in packs of 10,000, so a company just over a pack boundary in either category pays for a full additional pack rather than a handful of extra seats.
- Entry-level ODC pricing starts around 36,300 US dollars a year before any AO overage or extra user packs, which puts it out of reach for smaller teams evaluating low-code options.
- Cloud infrastructure and hosting costs are frequently separate from the platform licence, so the all-in bill is higher than the headline subscription figure suggests.
- Migrating a large application portfolio off OutSystems once built is difficult, since the generated code and platform-specific patterns are not designed for a clean export to standard frameworks.
Thunkable
- Every paid tier is metered by a monthly AI token allowance, so heavy use of the AI assistant, which is the tool's main productivity feature, can be exhausted well before a billing period ends.
- Only the Builder tier and above allow a live published app at all in useful numbers, so the entry-level paid plan cannot actually get an app onto the store in a meaningful way.
- Block-based logic becomes unwieldy for apps with genuinely complex business rules, and there is no clean escape hatch to written code within the platform.
- Native integrations and performance-sensitive features (heavy graphics, background processing) are limited compared to a coded framework, so the tool has a real complexity ceiling.
- App ownership and export options are more restrictive than an open source framework; leaving the platform typically means rebuilding rather than exporting a portable codebase.
Pricing, plan by plan
OutSystems
On request- ODC Entry$undefined/year
- Entry-level Application Object allowance included
- Internal users sold in packs of 100
- External users sold in packs of 10,000
- ODC Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom AO, user pack and environment volumes
- Negotiated multi-year enterprise agreements
- Premium support and dedicated infrastructure options
Thunkable
Free- FreeFree
- 2,000 AI tokens
- 3 public projects
- 5 screens per project
- Accelerator$19/month
- 20,000 AI tokens
- 5 public and 1 private project
- 10 screens per project
- Builder$37/month
- 50,000 AI tokens
- Unlimited public, 10 private projects
- Unlimited screens, 1 live published app
- Advanced$99/month
- 100,000 AI tokens
- Unlimited private projects and live published apps
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose OutSystems if
- You need visual application modelling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want generated deployable code.
Choose Thunkable if
- You need block-based logic editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want native compilation.
Questions people ask
- Is OutSystems or Thunkable better?
- Neither clearly leads. OutSystems starts at On request and Thunkable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OutSystems or Thunkable?
- Thunkable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for OutSystems and Free for Thunkable.
- Does OutSystems or Thunkable run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Thunkable for free?
- Yes. Thunkable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OutSystems starts at On request.
- What is OutSystems best used for?
- OutSystems is most often used for an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale, a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users, an it department that wants generated, inspectable code rather than a proprietary black-box runtime, an organisation with a large existing application portfolio needing centralised governance across many apps built by different teams. Of those, an enterprise replacing custom .net or java application development with a governed low-code platform at scale and a company building customer-facing portals where the external-user pricing tier (packs of 10,000) is materially cheaper than licensing customers as internal users are not what Thunkable is typically brought in for.
- What can OutSystems do that Thunkable cannot?
- OutSystems covers Visual application modelling, Generated deployable code, One-click deployment, AI-assisted development. Thunkable covers Block-based logic editor, Native compilation, AI app assistant, Component marketplace.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OutSystems: What is an Application Object?
A unit OutSystems uses to measure application complexity, counting elements such as screens, database tables and exposed APIs; more AOs mean a bigger licence requirement.
Thunkable: Can I publish an app on the free plan?
The free plan is aimed at building and testing; live publishing capacity in a meaningful way starts on the Builder plan.
OutSystems: Is there a free tier?
OutSystems has offered free or trial tiers historically for evaluation, but production use at any scale runs on paid ODC plans.
Thunkable: What happens if I run out of AI tokens?
AI-assisted generation stops working until the next billing cycle or an upgrade; manual block-based editing still works.
OutSystems: How does external user pricing work?
External users, typically customers or partners, are sold in packs of 10,000 at roughly a hundredth of the per-seat cost of internal (employee) user packs.
Thunkable: Is this suitable for a complex business app?
No. It is built for simple to moderately complex apps; heavy custom logic and native integrations are better served by a coded framework.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OutSystems vs Mendix
- OutSystems vs FlutterFlow
- OutSystems vs Appian
- OutSystems vs Superblocks
- OutSystems vs Caspio
- OutSystems vs Zoho Creator
- OutSystems vs Momen
- OutSystems vs Adalo
- OutSystems vs Bubble
- OutSystems vs Quickbase
- OutSystems vs ToolJet
- OutSystems vs Directual
- OutSystems vs Draftbit
- OutSystems vs Pabbly Connect
- OutSystems vs Stacker
- OutSystems vs Corteza
- Thunkable vs Mendix
- Thunkable vs FlutterFlow
- Thunkable vs Appian
- Thunkable vs Superblocks
- Thunkable vs Caspio
- Thunkable vs Zoho Creator
- Thunkable vs Momen
- Thunkable vs Adalo
- Thunkable vs Bubble
- Thunkable vs Quickbase
- Thunkable vs ToolJet
- Thunkable vs Directual
- Thunkable vs Draftbit
- Thunkable vs Pabbly Connect
- Thunkable vs Stacker
- Thunkable vs Corteza
