Databases · head to head
SurrealDB vs TiDB

SurrealDB
Databases
Multi-model database combining documents, graphs, vectors and time-series
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TiDB
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed SQL database with MySQL wire compatibility and a separate columnar replica for analytical queries.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SurrealDB the listed $0.192/node/hr Scale pricing lacks transparent higher-tier rates, requiring a sales conversation for full production sizing.; TiDB a production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- They diverge on capability: SurrealDB covers Multi-model engine, TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SurrealDB and TiDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SurrealDB
- Multi-model engine
- ACID transactions
- Hybrid retrieval
- Horizontal scaling
- Multi-region disaster recovery
- FIPS-compliant cryptography
Only in TiDB
- MySQL wire compatibility
- Horizontal write scaling
- Distributed ACID transactions
- TiFlash columnar replica
- Automatic rebalancing
- Raft replication
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Online schema change
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SurrealDB
- AI agent memory and retrieval-augmented generationnot TiDB
- Applications needing documents, graphs and vectors in one databasenot TiDB
- Knowledge graph construction from unstructured datanot TiDB
- Regulated workloads requiring SOC2/ISO27001/HIPAA-eligible hostingnot TiDB
TiDB
- A MySQL workload that has hit the write ceiling of a single primary and would otherwise need an application-level sharding layernot SurrealDB
- Reporting that must run against current transactional data, where the columnar replica removes the delay and the cost of an ETL pipelinenot SurrealDB
- Multi-region deployments needing a single logical database with automatic failover rather than manual primary promotionnot SurrealDB
- Migrating off a sharded MySQL estate where the sharding logic in the application has become the main source of bugs and operational toilnot SurrealDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SurrealDB
- The listed $0.192/node/hr Scale pricing lacks transparent higher-tier rates, requiring a sales conversation for full production sizing.
- As a newer multi-model database, it has a smaller ecosystem of drivers, ORMs and community tooling than established single-model databases.
- HIPAA compliance is only available as an Enterprise add-on rather than included in standard paid tiers.
- Combining multiple data models in one engine can add query-planning complexity compared to purpose-built single-model databases.
TiDB
- A production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- Every transaction takes a timestamp from the placement driver and crosses the network to storage nodes, so simple point queries are slower than on single-node MySQL and latency-sensitive paths need to be measured, not assumed.
- MySQL compatibility is at the wire and dialect level but not complete; stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, so an application that pushed logic into the database cannot simply be repointed.
- The columnar replica is an extra full copy of the data on its own nodes, so hybrid analytics roughly doubles storage and adds hardware that must be sized and paid for separately.
- Operating it well requires cluster-specific expertise in TiUP or the Kubernetes operator, region hot spots, and rebalancing behaviour, so the licence is free but the running cost includes an engineer who understands distributed storage.
Pricing, plan by plan
SurrealDB
Free- StartFree
- 1 free instance, then from $0.021/hr
- 1GB storage free forever
- Vertical scaling to terabytes
- Scale$0.192/month
- $0.192/node/hr
- Production-grade fault tolerance
- Horizontal scaling to petabytes
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Self-hosted, custom pricing
- Clustered fault-tolerant deployments
- FIPS-compliant cryptography
TiDB
Free- ServerlessFree
- 5GB storage
- 50M request units
- Free forever tier
- Dedicated$250/month
- Dedicated resources
- SLA guarantees
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose SurrealDB if
- You need multi-model engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want acid transactions.
Choose TiDB if
- You need mysql wire compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- You also want horizontal write scaling.
Questions people ask
- Is SurrealDB or TiDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. SurrealDB starts at Free and TiDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SurrealDB or TiDB?
- SurrealDB starts at Free and TiDB at Free.
- Does SurrealDB or TiDB run on more platforms?
- SurrealDB runs on web, api, windows, mac, linux. TiDB runs on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- Can I use SurrealDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is SurrealDB best used for?
- SurrealDB is most often used for ai agent memory and retrieval-augmented generation, applications needing documents, graphs and vectors in one database, knowledge graph construction from unstructured data, regulated workloads requiring soc2/iso27001/hipaa-eligible hosting. Of those, ai agent memory and retrieval-augmented generation and applications needing documents, graphs and vectors in one database are not what TiDB is typically brought in for.
- What can SurrealDB do that TiDB cannot?
- SurrealDB covers Multi-model engine, ACID transactions, Hybrid retrieval, Horizontal scaling. TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility, Horizontal write scaling, Distributed ACID transactions, TiFlash columnar replica.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SurrealDB: What does SurrealDB cost?
SurrealDB Cloud's Start plan is free with one free instance (then from $0.021/hr), the Scale plan runs $0.192/node/hr for production workloads, and Enterprise self-hosted deployments use custom pricing.
SourceTiDB: Is TiDB a drop-in replacement for MySQL?
At the protocol and dialect level it is close, and most applications connect unchanged. Stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, and latency characteristics differ, so it needs testing rather than assumption.
SurrealDB: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Start plan includes one free instance with 1GB of storage free forever and 1GB of outbound data transfer per month, aimed at prototypes and development.
SourceTiDB: What licence is it under?
Apache 2.0, for both TiDB and the underlying TiKV storage engine. TiKV is a graduated CNCF project, which is a meaningful governance signal in a market where several competitors moved to source-available licences.
SurrealDB: How is billing handled?
Customers are invoiced monthly based on actual usage in a pay-as-you-go model with no long-term commitments, though commitment-based discounts are available.
SourceTiDB: Do I need TiFlash?
Only for analytical queries. It is an optional columnar replica; without it TiDB is a distributed transactional database. With it you get analytics on live data at the cost of an additional full copy.
TiDB: Is the managed cloud the same software?
TiDB Cloud runs the same engine, with the control plane, scaling and operational tooling provided as a service. The entry tier is metered differently from a dedicated cluster, so the cost model rather than the engine is what changes.
TiDB: When is TiDB the wrong choice?
When the database is small enough for one server, when latency on single-row lookups is the primary constraint, or when the application depends on MySQL stored procedures and triggers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- SurrealDB vs Turso
- SurrealDB vs MotherDuck
- SurrealDB vs Vespa
- SurrealDB vs Zilliz
- SurrealDB vs ArangoDB
- SurrealDB vs RavenDB
- SurrealDB vs DuckDB
- SurrealDB vs Oracle Database
- SurrealDB vs TimescaleDB
- SurrealDB vs Estuary
- SurrealDB vs QuestDB
- SurrealDB vs CosmosDB
- SurrealDB vs DataGrip
- SurrealDB vs Firebolt
- SurrealDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- SurrealDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- SurrealDB vs Cockroach Labs
- SurrealDB vs Vitess
- SurrealDB vs Elasticsearch
- SurrealDB vs SingleStore
- SurrealDB vs BigQuery
- SurrealDB vs Amazon Redshift
- SurrealDB vs ClickHouse
- SurrealDB vs Apache Druid
- SurrealDB vs Couchbase
- SurrealDB vs MariaDB
- SurrealDB vs Redpanda
- SurrealDB vs RisingWave
- SurrealDB vs ScyllaDB
- SurrealDB vs Solace PubSub+
- SurrealDB vs SQLite
- SurrealDB vs StarRocks
- TiDB vs Turso
- TiDB vs MotherDuck
- TiDB vs Vespa
- TiDB vs Zilliz
- TiDB vs ArangoDB
- TiDB vs RavenDB
- TiDB vs DuckDB
- TiDB vs Oracle Database
- TiDB vs TimescaleDB
- TiDB vs Estuary
- TiDB vs QuestDB
- TiDB vs CosmosDB
- TiDB vs DataGrip
- TiDB vs Firebolt
- TiDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- TiDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- TiDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TiDB vs Vitess
- TiDB vs Elasticsearch
- TiDB vs SingleStore
- TiDB vs BigQuery
- TiDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TiDB vs ClickHouse
- TiDB vs Apache Druid
- TiDB vs Couchbase
- TiDB vs MariaDB
- TiDB vs Redpanda
- TiDB vs RisingWave
- TiDB vs ScyllaDB
- TiDB vs Solace PubSub+
- TiDB vs SQLite
- TiDB vs StarRocks
