Music · head to head
Studio One vs YouTube Music

Studio One
Music
Single-window workstation with album mastering built into the same project, now owned by Fender
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only YouTube Music has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Studio One the bundled Melodyne is the Essential tier, which corrects monophonic pitch only; polyphonic editing and the tools most people actually want are a paid upgrade from Celemony on top of the workstation licence.; YouTube Music free tier includes unskippable ads which interrupts music listening
- They diverge on capability: Studio One covers Project page, YouTube Music covers Music streaming.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Studio One and YouTube Music actually diverge.
| Attribute | Studio One | YouTube Music |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS | Web, Ios, Android, Smart-speakers |
| Founded | Unknown | 2005 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Music).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Studio One
- Project page
- Single window drag and drop
- ARA2 with Melodyne
- Scratch Pad
- Chord Track
- Show page
- Impact XT and Sample One
- Faderport integration
Only in YouTube Music
- Music streaming
- Music videos
- Live performances
- Personalization
- Google services
- Smart speakers
- Android Auto
- Google account security
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Studio One
- Delivering an album or EP where mastering must stay linked to the mixes, so a late vocal fix does not mean rebuilding the masternot YouTube Music
- Project studios already on PreSonus interfaces and Faderport surfaces, where the control mapping is done for younot YouTube Music
- Songwriters who want pitch editing in the timeline without buying Melodyne separatelynot YouTube Music
- Running the same session live from the Show page rather than rebuilding the set in a separate performance toolnot YouTube Music
YouTube Music
- Music streamingnot Studio One
- Video watchingnot Studio One
- Discoverynot Studio One
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Studio One
- The bundled Melodyne is the Essential tier, which corrects monophonic pitch only; polyphonic editing and the tools most people actually want are a paid upgrade from Celemony on top of the workstation licence.
- PreSonus now sells a subscription alongside the perpetual licence and the two are easy to confuse at checkout; the subscription stops working when payment stops, which is a very different asset for a studio planning in decades.
- Fender acquired PreSonus in 2022, so the roadmap sits inside a guitar hardware company, and long-term investment in the workstation is now a bet on that parent rather than on the original software team.
- There is no Linux build, and the MIDI editing tool set is shallower than Cubase, so composers doing rule based MIDI transformation or serious notation work will hit limits quickly.
- The plugin scanner has a long history of struggling with large third-party plugin collections, producing slow startup and occasional missing plugins when sessions move between machines.
YouTube Music
- Free tier includes unskippable ads which interrupts music listening
- User-uploaded content creates inconsistent audio quality and metadata compared to official releases
- Limited music discovery and recommendation features compared to Spotify's AI-powered algorithms
Pricing, plan by plan
Studio One
On request- Studio One Pro (perpetual licence)$undefined/one-time
- Bought outright and keeps working indefinitely
- Next major version is a separate paid upgrade
- Melodyne Essential included
- Studio One Pro+ (subscription)$undefined/month
- Workstation plus sound content and cloud storage
- Stops working when the subscription lapses
- Billed monthly or annually
YouTube Music
Free- FreeFree
- Ad-supported listening
- Music videos
- Premium$11.99/month
- Ad-free
- Offline downloads
- Background playback
- Family$18.99/month
- Up to 6 accounts
- Parental controls
- Student$5.99/month
- Ad-free
- YouTube Premium included
Which should you pick?
Choose Studio One if
- You need project page.
- You work on Windows, macOS.
- You also want single window drag and drop.
Choose YouTube Music if
- You need music streaming.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Smart-speakers.
- You also want music videos.
Questions people ask
- Is Studio One or YouTube Music better?
- Neither clearly leads. Studio One starts at On request and YouTube Music at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Studio One or YouTube Music?
- YouTube Music has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Studio One and Free for YouTube Music.
- Does Studio One or YouTube Music run on more platforms?
- Studio One runs on Windows, macOS. YouTube Music runs on Web, Ios, Android, Smart-speakers.
- Can I use YouTube Music for free?
- Yes. YouTube Music has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Studio One starts at On request.
- What is Studio One best used for?
- Studio One is most often used for delivering an album or ep where mastering must stay linked to the mixes, so a late vocal fix does not mean rebuilding the master, project studios already on presonus interfaces and faderport surfaces, where the control mapping is done for you, songwriters who want pitch editing in the timeline without buying melodyne separately, running the same session live from the show page rather than rebuilding the set in a separate performance tool. Of those, delivering an album or ep where mastering must stay linked to the mixes, so a late vocal fix does not mean rebuilding the master and project studios already on presonus interfaces and faderport surfaces, where the control mapping is done for you are not what YouTube Music is typically brought in for.
- What can Studio One do that YouTube Music cannot?
- Studio One covers Project page, Single window drag and drop, ARA2 with Melodyne, Scratch Pad. YouTube Music covers Music streaming, Music videos, Live performances, Personalization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Studio One: Who owns PreSonus?
Fender acquired PreSonus in 2022. Development continues, but the roadmap now sits inside a guitar hardware company rather than an independent software vendor.
YouTube Music: How much does YouTube Music Premium cost?
YouTube Music Premium costs $11.99 per month for individual subscriptions, $18.99 per month for family plans (up to 6 accounts), and $5.99 per month for students.
SourceStudio One: Is Studio One a subscription?
Both are sold. Studio One Pro is a perpetual licence you keep; Studio One Pro+ is a subscription bundling sound content and cloud storage that stops working when you stop paying.
YouTube Music: Does YouTube Music have a free tier?
Yes, YouTube Music offers a free version with access to music and music videos but includes occasional unskippable ads. Free users can create playlists and discover music but lack premium features like offline downloads.
SourceStudio One: Why is no price listed here?
PreSonus publishes current pricing, but the tier structure has been restructured across recent versions, so this entry points at the vendor page rather than quoting a figure that may already be wrong.
YouTube Music: What makes YouTube Music different from other streaming services?
YouTube Music uniquely provides access to official songs, music videos, live performances, remixes, and user-uploaded content not available on other platforms. Users can seamlessly switch between audio and official music videos.
SourceStudio One: What does the Project page actually do?
It sequences and masters a whole album inside the same file as the songs and stays linked to them, so changing a mix updates the master without a manual export and reimport.
Related pages
More on YouTube Music
Other head to heads
- Studio One vs Ableton Live
- Studio One vs REAPER
- Studio One vs Logic Pro
- Studio One vs Bitwig Studio
- Studio One vs Soundtrap
- Studio One vs Ardour
- Studio One vs Cubase
- Studio One vs BandLab
- Studio One vs Pro Tools
- Studio One vs Splice
- Studio One vs Renoise
- Studio One vs Deezer
- Studio One vs iHeartRadio
- Studio One vs Mixcloud
- Studio One vs Pandora
- Studio One vs GarageBand
- Studio One vs Amazon Music
- Studio One vs Tidal
- Studio One vs Bandcamp
- Studio One vs DistroKid
- Studio One vs TuneCore
- Studio One vs CD Baby
- Studio One vs rekordbox
- Studio One vs Serato DJ
- Studio One vs Traktor Pro
- Studio One vs Sibelius
- YouTube Music vs Ableton Live
- YouTube Music vs REAPER
- YouTube Music vs Logic Pro
- YouTube Music vs Bitwig Studio
- YouTube Music vs Soundtrap
- YouTube Music vs Ardour
- YouTube Music vs Cubase
- YouTube Music vs BandLab
- YouTube Music vs Pro Tools
- YouTube Music vs Splice
- YouTube Music vs Renoise
- YouTube Music vs Deezer
- YouTube Music vs iHeartRadio
- YouTube Music vs Mixcloud
- YouTube Music vs Pandora
- YouTube Music vs GarageBand
- YouTube Music vs Amazon Music
- YouTube Music vs Tidal
- YouTube Music vs Bandcamp
- YouTube Music vs DistroKid
- YouTube Music vs TuneCore
- YouTube Music vs CD Baby
- YouTube Music vs rekordbox
- YouTube Music vs Serato DJ
- YouTube Music vs Traktor Pro
- YouTube Music vs Sibelius

