File Storage · head to head
Storj vs Veeam Backup & Replication

Storj
File Storage
S3-compatible object storage distributed in encrypted pieces across independently operated nodes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Veeam Backup & Replication
File Storage
Modern data protection for enterprise workloads
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Storj billing includes a per segment charge and every object consumes at least one segment, so a bucket holding millions of small files can cost several times what the four dollar per terabyte headline implies.; Veeam Backup & Replication replication propagates corrupted data without detection, as it focuses on speed without extensive integrity checks
- They diverge on capability: Storj covers Erasure coded distribution, Veeam Backup & Replication covers Instant VM recovery.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Storj and Veeam Backup & Replication actually diverge.
| Attribute | Storj | Veeam Backup & Replication |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per terabyte per month | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, API, Linux, macOS, Windows | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Storj
- Erasure coded distribution
- Client side encryption
- S3-compatible gateway
- Native uplink access
- Object Lock and versioning
- Storj Select
Only in Veeam Backup & Replication
- Instant VM recovery
- Ransomware protection
- Immutable backups
- Application-aware processing
- Global deduplication
- Continuous data protection
- VMware vSphere
- Microsoft Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Storj
- An offsite backup or archive target where the data is large, written once and occasionally restorednot Veeam Backup & Replication
- Serving large media files internationally without paying hyperscaler egress ratesnot Veeam Backup & Replication
- Storing data where the objection to AWS, Azure or Google is jurisdiction and concentration rather than costnot Veeam Backup & Replication
- A second, independent copy of a dataset that already lives in a hyperscaler bucketnot Veeam Backup & Replication
Veeam Backup & Replication
- Data protectionnot Storj
- Disaster recoverynot Storj
- Business continuitynot Storj
- Ransomware protectionnot Storj
- Compliancenot Storj
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Storj
- Billing includes a per segment charge and every object consumes at least one segment, so a bucket holding millions of small files can cost several times what the four dollar per terabyte headline implies.
- Reconstructing an object requires responses from dozens of independent nodes, so time to first byte is noticeably higher than a centralised bucket and it is a poor fit behind a latency sensitive read path.
- Performance depends on the mix of node operators serving you at that moment rather than on a datacentre you can raise a ticket against, so slow reads are diagnosed statistically rather than fixed.
- The hosted S3 gateway terminates encryption on Storj infrastructure, so using the convenient access path gives up the end to end encryption that is the main architectural argument for the service.
- The S3 gateway is compatible rather than identical, so tools that lean on less common API calls, multipart edge cases or unusual header behaviour need testing before you commit a workload to it.
Veeam Backup & Replication
- Replication propagates corrupted data without detection, as it focuses on speed without extensive integrity checks
- Cannot use guest file indexing for snapshot-only jobs, limiting recovery options
- Multi-factor authentication is not supported for object storage repositories
- Scale-out backup repositories do not support rotated drives and have limited functionality
Pricing, plan by plan
Storj
Free- Free trialFree
- 25 GB stored
- 25 GB egress per month
- No card required to start
- Storj$4/month
- 4 USD per terabyte stored per month
- 7 USD per terabyte of egress
- Per segment fee on top of stored volume
Veeam Backup & Replication
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Veeam Backup & Replication review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Storj if
- You need erasure coded distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want client side encryption.
Choose Veeam Backup & Replication if
- You need instant vm recovery.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want ransomware protection.
Questions people ask
- Is Storj or Veeam Backup & Replication better?
- Neither clearly leads. Storj starts at Free and Veeam Backup & Replication at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Storj or Veeam Backup & Replication?
- Storj starts at Free and Veeam Backup & Replication at Free.
- Does Storj or Veeam Backup & Replication run on more platforms?
- Storj runs on Web, API, Linux, macOS, Windows. Veeam Backup & Replication runs on Windows.
- Can I use Storj for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Storj best used for?
- Storj is most often used for an offsite backup or archive target where the data is large, written once and occasionally restored, serving large media files internationally without paying hyperscaler egress rates, storing data where the objection to aws, azure or google is jurisdiction and concentration rather than cost, a second, independent copy of a dataset that already lives in a hyperscaler bucket. Of those, an offsite backup or archive target where the data is large, written once and occasionally restored and serving large media files internationally without paying hyperscaler egress rates are not what Veeam Backup & Replication is typically brought in for.
- What can Storj do that Veeam Backup & Replication cannot?
- Storj covers Erasure coded distribution, Client side encryption, S3-compatible gateway, Native uplink access. Veeam Backup & Replication covers Instant VM recovery, Ransomware protection, Immutable backups, Application-aware processing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Storj: Why is my bill higher than four dollars per terabyte?
Almost always the per segment fee. Objects are split into segments and small files each consume one, so a few million tiny objects generate a segment charge that dwarfs the storage line.
Veeam Backup & Replication: What is included in Veeam's free tier?
Veeam's free Community Edition supports unlimited backups and replication for up to 10 workloads with the same features as the Standard tier, with no time limit.
SourceStorj: Can node operators read my data?
No. Files are encrypted client side and each operator holds only an erasure coded fragment, which is not a readable portion of the file.
Veeam Backup & Replication: How long can Veeam retain backups?
Veeam retention depends on your storage configuration but typically supports retention of multiple backup versions for weeks to years depending on storage capacity and retention policies configured.
SourceStorj: Is there a minimum retention period?
No. You are billed for what you store while you store it, unlike several competitors that bill a ninety day minimum whatever you delete.
Veeam Backup & Replication: Can Veeam replicate data to cloud storage?
Yes, Veeam Backup & Replication supports replication and backup to cloud storage including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, with support for object storage repositories and immutable backups.
SourceStorj: Is it fast enough to serve a website from?
For large files with parallel reads, yes. For many small objects where time to first byte matters, put a CDN in front of it or use something centralised.
Veeam Backup & Replication: What hypervisors does Veeam support?
Veeam natively supports VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper-V for VM backup and replication, with additional support for physical servers and cloud instances through complementary tools.
SourceRelated pages
More on Veeam Backup & Replication
Other head to heads
- Storj vs Cloudflare R2
- Storj vs Backblaze
- Storj vs Scality RING
- Storj vs IDrive e2
- Storj vs Cloudian
- Storj vs MinIO
- Storj vs Tigris
- Storj vs Ceph
- Storj vs Panzura
- Storj vs TrueNAS
- Storj vs VAST Data
- Storj vs Duplicati
- Storj vs LucidLink
- Storj vs pCloud
- Storj vs Sync.com
- Storj vs Veritas NetBackup
- Storj vs Barracuda Backup
- Storj vs Zerto
- Storj vs Box
- Storj vs IDrive
- Storj vs Arq Backup
- Storj vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Storj vs Nextcloud
- Storj vs Tresorit
- Storj vs Google Drive
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Cloudflare R2
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Backblaze
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Scality RING
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs IDrive e2
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Cloudian
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs MinIO
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Tigris
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Ceph
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Panzura
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs TrueNAS
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs VAST Data
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Duplicati
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs LucidLink
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs pCloud
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Sync.com
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Veritas NetBackup
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Barracuda Backup
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Zerto
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Box
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs IDrive
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Arq Backup
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Nextcloud
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Tresorit
- Veeam Backup & Replication vs Google Drive
