Cloud · head to head
SST vs Cilium

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SST primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support; Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- They diverge on capability: SST covers Single config file, Cilium covers eBPF datapath.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SST and Cilium actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SST
- Single config file
- Resource linking
- Local development
- Multi-cloud support
- Multiple deployment stages
- VPC tunneling
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SST
- Deploying Next.js frontends with serverless backendsnot Cilium
- Managing databases and storage alongside application codenot Cilium
- Creating staging environments for feature testingnot Cilium
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot SST
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot SST
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot SST
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SST
- Primarily optimized for AWS with Cloudflare support
- Learning curve for developers unfamiliar with infrastructure concepts
- Limited documentation for some advanced use cases
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Pricing, plan by plan
SST
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the SST review.
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose SST if
- You need single config file.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js.
- You also want resource linking.
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Questions people ask
- Is SST or Cilium better?
- Neither clearly leads. SST starts at Free and Cilium at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SST or Cilium?
- SST starts at Free and Cilium at Free.
- Does SST or Cilium run on more platforms?
- SST runs on AWS, Cloudflare, Node.js. Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux.
- Can I use SST for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is SST best used for?
- SST is most often used for deploying next.js frontends with serverless backends, managing databases and storage alongside application code, creating staging environments for feature testing. Of those, deploying next.js frontends with serverless backends and managing databases and storage alongside application code are not what Cilium is typically brought in for.
- What can SST do that Cilium cannot?
- SST covers Single config file, Resource linking, Local development, Multi-cloud support. Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SST: Is SST free?
Yes, SST is open source and free. You only pay for cloud resources from AWS and other providers.
SourceCilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
SST: What cloud providers does SST support?
SST supports over 150 providers through built-in AWS and Cloudflare components, plus Pulumi and Terraform providers.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Cilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- SST vs Grafana Cloud
- SST vs Neon
- SST vs DigitalOcean
- SST vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- SST vs Pulumi
- SST vs Fly.io
- SST vs Anyscale
- SST vs Fireworks AI
- SST vs Podman
- SST vs Railway
- SST vs Render
- SST vs Vault
- SST vs Wiz
- SST vs Beam Cloud
- SST vs Cerebrium
- SST vs DeepInfra
- SST vs Go
- SST vs Azure Functions
- Cilium vs Grafana Cloud
- Cilium vs Neon
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Cilium vs Pulumi
- Cilium vs Fly.io
- Cilium vs Anyscale
- Cilium vs Fireworks AI
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs Railway
- Cilium vs Render
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Wiz
- Cilium vs Beam Cloud
- Cilium vs Cerebrium
- Cilium vs DeepInfra
- Cilium vs Go
- Cilium vs Azure Functions

