Agriculture · head to head
SMARTBOW vs Teralytic

SMARTBOW
Agriculture
Ear tag cow monitoring with real-time indoor location, from Zoetis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Teralytic
Agriculture
Wireless soil probe reading NPK at three depths, sold as an annual per-probe service rather than a sensor
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SMARTBOW real-time location depends on receivers covering the whole barn plus an on-farm server, so the install is a building project and the price bears no relation to what a simple activity collar costs.; Teralytic the company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- They diverge on capability: SMARTBOW covers Real-time location, Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SMARTBOW and Teralytic actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SMARTBOW
- Real-time location
- Heat detection
- Rumination monitoring
- Health alerts
- On-farm server
- Individual baselines
- Herd software integration
Only in Teralytic
- Wireless NPK sensing
- Three-depth profile
- Soil respiration and aeration
- Long-range radio uplink
- Cloud analytics
- Above-ground sensing
- API access
- Multi-field deployment view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SMARTBOW
- A 1,500 cow freestall barn where finding a flagged animal by eye takes twenty minutesnot Teralytic
- A dairy replacing visual heat detection with per-animal oestrus alerts to tighten calving intervalsnot Teralytic
- A herd manager wanting rumination-based early warning of displaced abomasum or metritisnot Teralytic
- A vet practice using behavioural data to audit transition cow management across client herdsnot Teralytic
Teralytic
- A research trial that needs continuous nitrogen readings between sampling dates rather than two lab tests a seasonnot SMARTBOW
- A vegetable grower on sandy ground where leaching after rain makes a fortnightly lab test worthlessnot SMARTBOW
- An almond or vine operation tracking salinity build-up under drip irrigationnot SMARTBOW
- An agronomist validating a variable-rate nitrogen prescription against in-ground readingsnot SMARTBOW
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SMARTBOW
- Real-time location depends on receivers covering the whole barn plus an on-farm server, so the install is a building project and the price bears no relation to what a simple activity collar costs.
- It is an indoor system; a grazing or partly grazed herd loses the location capability that is the main reason to choose it over cheaper monitoring.
- Ear tags are consumable and go missing with the tag, so the running cost includes replacements at a rate that depends on how rough your handling facilities are.
- Zoetis ownership means a pharmaceutical company holds continuous behavioural data on every animal alongside your treatment records, and the integration roadmap favours other Zoetis products.
- Nothing is published on price, and sales run through veterinary and dealer channels, so comparing it against DeLaval, Nedap or CowManager requires several quotes and there is no reference list price.
Teralytic
- The company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- No current pricing is published and reported figures have moved between roughly 300 and 500 US dollars per probe per year, so a buyer cannot model the cost of a hundred-probe deployment without a quote.
- The subscription is mandatory for the probe to report at all, so the up-front hardware payment buys nothing durable and a lapsed account means a field full of dead instruments.
- In-field NPK sensing is scientifically contested and readings need interpretation against soil type and calibration, so agronomists will not treat the numbers as interchangeable with a lab test and many will insist on both.
- Spatial coverage is the unsolved problem: a probe measures one point, soil varies over metres, and covering a field properly multiplies both the hardware and the annual subscription by the number of zones you care about.
Pricing, plan by plan
SMARTBOW
On request- SMARTBOW$undefined/year
- Ear tags priced per animal
- Barn receiver infrastructure and on-farm server quoted per building
- Installation and commissioning quoted separately
Teralytic
On request- Teralytic Soil Probe$undefined/year
- Probe purchased or supplied with an annual per-probe subscription
- Subscription covers hardware, network, software and analytics
- Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 USD per probe per year
Which should you pick?
Choose SMARTBOW if
- You need real-time location.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want heat detection.
Choose Teralytic if
- You need wireless npk sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want three-depth profile.
Questions people ask
- Is SMARTBOW or Teralytic better?
- Neither clearly leads. SMARTBOW starts at On request and Teralytic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SMARTBOW or Teralytic?
- SMARTBOW starts at On request and Teralytic at On request.
- Does SMARTBOW or Teralytic run on more platforms?
- SMARTBOW runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Teralytic runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is SMARTBOW best used for?
- SMARTBOW is most often used for a 1,500 cow freestall barn where finding a flagged animal by eye takes twenty minutes, a dairy replacing visual heat detection with per-animal oestrus alerts to tighten calving intervals, a herd manager wanting rumination-based early warning of displaced abomasum or metritis, a vet practice using behavioural data to audit transition cow management across client herds. Of those, a 1,500 cow freestall barn where finding a flagged animal by eye takes twenty minutes and a dairy replacing visual heat detection with per-animal oestrus alerts to tighten calving intervals are not what Teralytic is typically brought in for.
- What can SMARTBOW do that Teralytic cannot?
- SMARTBOW covers Real-time location, Heat detection, Rumination monitoring, Health alerts. Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing, Three-depth profile, Soil respiration and aeration, Long-range radio uplink.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SMARTBOW: What does SMARTBOW do that other activity monitors do not?
Real-time indoor location. It tells you where the flagged cow physically is, not just that she is behaving abnormally.
Teralytic: Can I buy the probe without a subscription?
No. The probe reports through Teralytic’s network into its cloud, and without an active subscription it does not deliver data.
SMARTBOW: Does it work on grazing herds?
Poorly. Location depends on barn-mounted receivers, so animals out at pasture fall outside the system's coverage.
Teralytic: Does it replace lab soil tests?
No. It gives continuous in-season trend data. Most agronomists will still want lab results for absolute nutrient values and for compliance records.
SMARTBOW: Who owns it?
Zoetis, which also owns Valley Agricultural Software and DairyComp. The technology came from Smartbow GmbH in Austria.
Teralytic: How much does it cost?
Teralytic does not publish current pricing. Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 US dollars per probe per year including hardware and connectivity.
SMARTBOW: Is it cloud based?
Analysis runs on an on-farm server rather than in the cloud, which keeps it working during an internet outage but makes the server your responsibility.
Teralytic: How many probes does a field need?
That depends on soil variability. One probe represents one point, so a field with several distinct soil zones needs one per zone to be meaningful.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- SMARTBOW vs Halter
- SMARTBOW vs DairyComp
- SMARTBOW vs GEA DairyNet
- SMARTBOW vs Nedap Livestock Management
- SMARTBOW vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- SMARTBOW vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- SMARTBOW vs Lely Horizon
- SMARTBOW vs Connecterra
- SMARTBOW vs Sentera
- SMARTBOW vs Cropio
- SMARTBOW vs Lindsay FieldNET
- SMARTBOW vs GrainBridge
- SMARTBOW vs Growers Edge
- SMARTBOW vs Indigo Agriculture
- SMARTBOW vs John Deere Operations Center
- SMARTBOW vs OneSoil
- SMARTBOW vs CropX
- SMARTBOW vs Arable
- SMARTBOW vs METER Group ZENTRA
- SMARTBOW vs Soil Scout
- SMARTBOW vs CeresAI
- SMARTBOW vs FarmLogs
- SMARTBOW vs Ag Leader
- SMARTBOW vs AgriWater
- SMARTBOW vs Reinke ReinCloud
- SMARTBOW vs Tend
- SMARTBOW vs Traction
- SMARTBOW vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Teralytic vs Halter
- Teralytic vs DairyComp
- Teralytic vs GEA DairyNet
- Teralytic vs Nedap Livestock Management
- Teralytic vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Teralytic vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Teralytic vs Lely Horizon
- Teralytic vs Connecterra
- Teralytic vs Sentera
- Teralytic vs Cropio
- Teralytic vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Teralytic vs GrainBridge
- Teralytic vs Growers Edge
- Teralytic vs Indigo Agriculture
- Teralytic vs John Deere Operations Center
- Teralytic vs OneSoil
- Teralytic vs CropX
- Teralytic vs Arable
- Teralytic vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Teralytic vs Soil Scout
- Teralytic vs CeresAI
- Teralytic vs FarmLogs
- Teralytic vs Ag Leader
- Teralytic vs AgriWater
- Teralytic vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Teralytic vs Tend
- Teralytic vs Traction
- Teralytic vs xarvio Digital Farming
