Cybersecurity · head to head
Sigstore vs Sticky Password

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sticky Password
Cybersecurity
Password manager with autofill, digital wallet, and dark web monitoring
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.; Sticky Password offers no dedicated family plan, requiring individual licenses or a Teams plan to cover a household.
- They diverge on capability: Sigstore covers Fulcio, Sticky Password covers Autofill and capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sigstore and Sticky Password actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sigstore | Sticky Password |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, public instance free to use | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted | web, ios, android, windows, mac |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
Only in Sticky Password
- Autofill and capture
- Encrypted vault sync
- Emergency access
- Dark web monitoring
- Password sharing
- Digital wallet
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot Sticky Password
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot Sticky Password
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot Sticky Password
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot Sticky Password
Sticky Password
- Storing and autofilling passwords across devicesnot Sigstore
- Securely sharing a login with a family member or colleaguenot Sigstore
- Granting emergency vault access to a trusted contactnot Sigstore
- Monitoring saved credentials for dark web exposurenot Sigstore
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Sticky Password
- Offers no dedicated family plan, requiring individual licenses or a Teams plan to cover a household.
- Free tier is limited to a 30-day Premium trial rather than a permanent free feature set.
- Lacks the browser-based item history and detailed sharing permissions offered by some larger competitors.
- Business/Teams tooling is lighter than dedicated enterprise password managers with SSO and SCIM support.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Sticky Password
Free- Free (30-day Premium trial)Free
- 30-day trial of Premium features
- Basic password storage after trial
- Premium$2.5/month
- Vault sync across devices
- Password sharing
- Dark web monitoring
- Teams$2.5/month
- Per-user pricing billed annually
- Usable for families or businesses
- Centralized license management
Which should you pick?
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Choose Sticky Password if
- You need autofill and capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, windows, mac.
- You also want encrypted vault sync.
Questions people ask
- Is Sigstore or Sticky Password better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sigstore starts at Free and Sticky Password at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sigstore or Sticky Password?
- Sigstore starts at Free and Sticky Password at Free.
- Does Sigstore or Sticky Password run on more platforms?
- Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Sticky Password runs on web, ios, android, windows, mac.
- Can I use Sigstore for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Sigstore best used for?
- Sigstore is most often used for open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authority, organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing product, publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of you, self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptable. Of those, open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authority and organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing product are not what Sticky Password is typically brought in for.
- What can Sigstore do that Sticky Password cannot?
- Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients. Sticky Password covers Autofill and capture, Encrypted vault sync, Emergency access, Dark web monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
Sigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
Sigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
Sigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
More on Sticky Password
Other head to heads
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs 1Password
- Sigstore vs Enpass
- Sigstore vs LastPass
- Sigstore vs Norton 360
- Sigstore vs Keeper Password Manager
- Sigstore vs HashiCorp Vault
- Sigstore vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Sigstore vs Akeyless
- Sigstore vs Doppler
- Sigstore vs Passbolt
- Sigstore vs Frontegg
- Sigstore vs Milestone XProtect
- Sigstore vs Osano
- Sigstore vs Proton Mail
- Sigstore vs Veriff
- Sigstore vs Brave Browser
- Sigstore vs March Networks
- Sticky Password vs Cosign
- Sticky Password vs Syft
- Sticky Password vs Logto
- Sticky Password vs Infisical
- Sticky Password vs Chainguard
- Sticky Password vs Ory
- Sticky Password vs OWASP ZAP
- Sticky Password vs Bitwarden
- Sticky Password vs Semgrep
- Sticky Password vs Trivy
- Sticky Password vs authentik
- Sticky Password vs Authelia
- Sticky Password vs Resolver
- Sticky Password vs Saviynt
- Sticky Password vs Securiti
- Sticky Password vs Speakeasy
- Sticky Password vs Sysdig
- Sticky Password vs Tenable
- Sticky Password vs 1Password
- Sticky Password vs Enpass
- Sticky Password vs LastPass
- Sticky Password vs Norton 360
- Sticky Password vs Keeper Password Manager
- Sticky Password vs HashiCorp Vault
- Sticky Password vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Sticky Password vs Akeyless
- Sticky Password vs Doppler
- Sticky Password vs Passbolt
- Sticky Password vs Frontegg
- Sticky Password vs Milestone XProtect
- Sticky Password vs Osano
- Sticky Password vs Proton Mail
- Sticky Password vs Veriff
- Sticky Password vs Brave Browser
- Sticky Password vs March Networks
