Cybersecurity · head to head
Rhombus Systems vs Sigstore

Rhombus Systems
Cybersecurity
Cloud-managed cameras, sensors and access control with a per-camera annual licence
- From
- $149/year
- Rated
- -

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sigstore has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Rhombus Systems the per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.; Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- They diverge on capability: Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage, Sigstore covers Fulcio.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Rhombus Systems and Sigstore actually diverge.
| Attribute | Rhombus Systems | Sigstore |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $149/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Per camera per year licence plus hardware | Open source, public instance free to use |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Rhombus Systems
- On-camera storage
- No NVR or server
- AI search
- Access control
- Environmental sensors
- Unlimited users
- Ten year hardware warranty
- Optional cloud archiving
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Rhombus Systems
- A school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local IT at each sitenot Sigstore
- A clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trailnot Sigstore
- A logistics operator that wants to search for a specific vehicle across sites without scrubbing footagenot Sigstore
- An office estate replacing ageing NVRs where nobody remains who knows how to maintain themnot Sigstore
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot Rhombus Systems
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot Rhombus Systems
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot Rhombus Systems
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot Rhombus Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Rhombus Systems
- The per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- Cameras must be Rhombus, so there is no reuse of existing IP cameras and migrating away means replacing every device rather than changing software.
- Cloud archiving is priced separately by retention and stream count, and long retention on multisensor cameras runs into five figures per camera, which can dwarf everything else in the quote.
- On-camera storage is the default retention, so a camera physically stolen or destroyed takes its unarchived footage with it unless cloud archiving was paid for on that camera.
- Analytics and integrations are good for mid-market needs but shallower than a dedicated enterprise VMS with a large third-party ecosystem, so specialist requirements like advanced LPR or forensic search hit limits.
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Pricing, plan by plan
Rhombus Systems
$149/year- Professional$149/year
- Per camera per year
- Cloud console and management
- On-camera storage retention
- Enterprise$199/year
- Per camera per year
- Everything in Professional
- Flexible cloud archiving options
- Cloud archiving$undefined/year
- Priced separately by retention period and stream count
- Multisensor cameras cost several times a single sensor camera
- Long retention on multisensor models can reach five figures per camera
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Which should you pick?
Choose Rhombus Systems if
- You need on-camera storage.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no nvr or server.
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Questions people ask
- Is Rhombus Systems or Sigstore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Rhombus Systems starts at $149/year and Sigstore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Rhombus Systems or Sigstore?
- Sigstore has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $149/year for Rhombus Systems and Free for Sigstore.
- Does Rhombus Systems or Sigstore run on more platforms?
- Rhombus Systems runs on Web, iOS, Android. Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Sigstore for free?
- Yes. Sigstore has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Rhombus Systems starts at $149/year.
- What is Rhombus Systems best used for?
- Rhombus Systems is most often used for a school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local it at each site, a clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trail, a logistics operator that wants to search for a specific vehicle across sites without scrubbing footage, an office estate replacing ageing nvrs where nobody remains who knows how to maintain them. Of those, a school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local it at each site and a clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trail are not what Sigstore is typically brought in for.
- What can Rhombus Systems do that Sigstore cannot?
- Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage, No NVR or server, AI search, Access control. Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Rhombus Systems: Do I need an NVR or a server?
No. Cameras record on board and connect directly to the cloud console, which is the main operational reason organisations pick it.
Sigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
Rhombus Systems: What does the licence cost?
Roughly $149 per camera per year for Professional and about $199 for Enterprise, typically sold in one, three, five or ten year terms.
Sigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
Rhombus Systems: Is cloud storage included?
No. On-camera storage is the default. Cloud archiving is a separate charge priced by retention duration and number of streams.
Sigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
Rhombus Systems: Can I use my existing cameras?
No. The platform works only with Rhombus hardware, which is the trade-off for the zero-server architecture.
Sigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
More on Rhombus Systems
Other head to heads
- Rhombus Systems vs Spot AI
- Rhombus Systems vs Salient CompleteView
- Rhombus Systems vs Milestone XProtect
- Rhombus Systems vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Rhombus Systems vs DTiQ
- Rhombus Systems vs Motorola Vigilant
- Rhombus Systems vs Genetec Security Center
- Rhombus Systems vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Camio
- Rhombus Systems vs Dahua Technology
- Rhombus Systems vs March Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Envysion
- Rhombus Systems vs Avast One
- Rhombus Systems vs Chainguard
- Rhombus Systems vs Cosign
- Rhombus Systems vs CyberGhost VPN
- Rhombus Systems vs Descope
- Rhombus Systems vs Syft
- Rhombus Systems vs Logto
- Rhombus Systems vs Infisical
- Rhombus Systems vs Ory
- Rhombus Systems vs OWASP ZAP
- Rhombus Systems vs Bitwarden
- Rhombus Systems vs Semgrep
- Rhombus Systems vs Trivy
- Rhombus Systems vs authentik
- Rhombus Systems vs Authelia
- Rhombus Systems vs Resolver
- Rhombus Systems vs Saviynt
- Rhombus Systems vs Securiti
- Rhombus Systems vs Speakeasy
- Rhombus Systems vs Sysdig
- Rhombus Systems vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs Spot AI
- Sigstore vs Salient CompleteView
- Sigstore vs Milestone XProtect
- Sigstore vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Sigstore vs DTiQ
- Sigstore vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sigstore vs Genetec Security Center
- Sigstore vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Sigstore vs Camio
- Sigstore vs Dahua Technology
- Sigstore vs March Networks
- Sigstore vs Envysion
- Sigstore vs Avast One
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs CyberGhost VPN
- Sigstore vs Descope
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable
