Cloud · head to head
Puppet vs VerneMQ

VerneMQ
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker whose source is Apache 2.0 but whose official binaries need a paid subscription
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Puppet no pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales; VerneMQ the official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- They diverge on capability: Puppet covers Manifests, VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Puppet and VerneMQ actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (quote), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Puppet
- Manifests
- Modules
- Classes
- Variables
- Facts
- Puppet Master
- Hiera
- Facter
Only in VerneMQ
- Erlang/OTP clustering
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Plugin system
- Backpressure handling
- Bridge support
- Metrics export
- MQTT over WebSockets
- Pluggable auth backends
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Puppet
- Infrastructure automationnot VerneMQ
- Configuration managementnot VerneMQ
- DevOps at scalenot VerneMQ
- Enterprise infrastructurenot VerneMQ
VerneMQ
- An industrial operator that wants an MQTT broker with predictable memory behaviour and no data integration features it will not usenot Puppet
- A team building from source to stay strictly under Apache 2.0 terms with no vendor licence entanglementnot Puppet
- A deployment needing custom authentication logic implemented as a plugin in Lua or over a webhooknot Puppet
- An organisation that wants a broker maintained by a small European company rather than by a vendor that keeps changing licencesnot Puppet
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Puppet
- No pricing published for commercial tiers; requires contacting sales
- Enterprise and Advanced tiers require custom quote
- Free tier limited to 25 nodes maximum
VerneMQ
- The official binaries and Docker images are not Apache 2.0 but sit under a EULA requiring a yearly commercial subscription, a distinction easy to miss and awkward to discover during a licence audit.
- Octavo Labs is a very small company, so support depth, response times and the bus factor on the codebase are materially thinner than at HiveMQ or EMQ.
- There is no data integration or rule engine layer, so routing messages into a database means writing and operating your own consumer service.
- Operating an Erlang cluster requires runtime knowledge that most teams do not have and will use for nothing else in their stack.
- There is no vendor-managed cloud offering, so every deployment is self-operated with the infrastructure and on-call cost that implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Puppet
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 25 nodes
- Core Commercial$null/custom
- 25+ nodes
- Vendor-backed SLAs
- Training with Certified Engineers
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Web GUI
- RBAC
- Multi-environment support
- Advanced$null/custom
- AI-powered features
- Advanced patching
- Vulnerability remediation
VerneMQ
Free- Source buildFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed source from GitHub
- Full clustering and plugin capability
- You compile and package it yourself
- Binary packages and Docker images$undefined/year
- Covered by the VerneMQ EULA, not Apache 2.0
- Yearly usage subscription expected for commercial use
- Official builds and Docker images
- Commercial support$undefined/year
- Evaluation, customisation and operations assistance
- Custom development
- Long-term maintenance agreements
Which should you pick?
Choose Puppet if
- You need manifests.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api.
- You also want modules.
Choose VerneMQ if
- You need erlang/otp clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 support.
Questions people ask
- Is Puppet or VerneMQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Puppet starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Puppet or VerneMQ?
- Puppet starts at Free and VerneMQ at Free.
- Does Puppet or VerneMQ run on more platforms?
- Puppet runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Api. VerneMQ runs on Linux, Docker, macOS, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Puppet for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Puppet best used for?
- Puppet is most often used for infrastructure automation, configuration management, devops at scale, enterprise infrastructure. Of those, infrastructure automation and configuration management are not what VerneMQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Puppet do that VerneMQ cannot?
- Puppet covers Manifests, Modules, Classes, Variables. VerneMQ covers Erlang/OTP clustering, MQTT 5.0 support, Plugin system, Backpressure handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Puppet: How much does Puppet cost?
Puppet's Developer tier is free for up to 25 nodes. Commercial, Enterprise, and Advanced tiers require contacting their sales team for a custom quote.
SourceVerneMQ: Is VerneMQ free?
The source is Apache 2.0 and free. The official binary packages and Docker images are covered by a separate EULA that expects a yearly fee for commercial use.
Puppet: Is there a free version of Puppet?
Yes, Puppet's Developer tier is free forever for up to 25 nodes of infrastructure.
SourceVerneMQ: Is the project still maintained?
Yes. Octavo Labs AG in Zurich continues to publish 2.x releases, most recently in 2026.
Puppet: What does the Enterprise tier include?
Puppet's Enterprise tier includes web GUI, RBAC, and multi-environment support for organizations managing infrastructure at scale, with pricing available upon request.
SourceVerneMQ: Does it have a managed cloud?
No. Every deployment is self-hosted, with commercial support available from Octavo Labs.
VerneMQ: How does it compare to EMQX?
Narrower in features and without a rule engine, but with a simpler licence story for source builds after EMQX moved to BSL.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Puppet vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Puppet vs DigitalOcean
- Puppet vs Grafana Cloud
- Puppet vs Neon
- Puppet vs Chef
- Puppet vs Packer
- Puppet vs Google Cloud Platform
- Puppet vs Microsoft Azure
- Puppet vs Lambda
- Puppet vs Oracle Cloud
- Puppet vs Akamai
- Puppet vs IBM Cloud
- Puppet vs Jaeger
- Puppet vs Linode
- Puppet vs Northflank
- Puppet vs Longhorn
- Puppet vs minikube
- Puppet vs EMQX
- Puppet vs RabbitMQ
- Puppet vs NATS
- Puppet vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Puppet vs Canary Labs
- Puppet vs Solace PubSub+
- Puppet vs TimescaleDB
- Puppet vs Apache Pulsar
- Puppet vs Presto
- Puppet vs StarRocks
- Puppet vs Timeplus
- Puppet vs PostgreSQL
- Puppet vs Chroma
- Puppet vs Cloudinary
- Puppet vs Convex
- Puppet vs Dgraph
- Puppet vs Dragonfly
- Puppet vs Dremio
- VerneMQ vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- VerneMQ vs DigitalOcean
- VerneMQ vs Grafana Cloud
- VerneMQ vs Neon
- VerneMQ vs Chef
- VerneMQ vs Packer
- VerneMQ vs Google Cloud Platform
- VerneMQ vs Microsoft Azure
- VerneMQ vs Lambda
- VerneMQ vs Oracle Cloud
- VerneMQ vs Akamai
- VerneMQ vs IBM Cloud
- VerneMQ vs Jaeger
- VerneMQ vs Linode
- VerneMQ vs Northflank
- VerneMQ vs Longhorn
- VerneMQ vs minikube
- VerneMQ vs EMQX
- VerneMQ vs RabbitMQ
- VerneMQ vs NATS
- VerneMQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- VerneMQ vs Canary Labs
- VerneMQ vs Solace PubSub+
- VerneMQ vs TimescaleDB
- VerneMQ vs Apache Pulsar
- VerneMQ vs Presto
- VerneMQ vs StarRocks
- VerneMQ vs Timeplus
- VerneMQ vs PostgreSQL
- VerneMQ vs Chroma
- VerneMQ vs Cloudinary
- VerneMQ vs Convex
- VerneMQ vs Dgraph
- VerneMQ vs Dragonfly
- VerneMQ vs Dremio

