Cloud · head to head
Porter vs Caddy
The short version
- Only Caddy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Porter pricing based on vCPU and memory can be expensive for small projects; Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- They diverge on capability: Porter covers Rapid deployment, Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Porter and Caddy actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Porter
- Rapid deployment
- Multi-cloud support
- Framework agnostic
- DevOps automation
- Enterprise compliance
- Cost optimization
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Porter
- Deploying Next.js applications with serverless backendsnot Caddy
- Scaling microservices across multiple cloud providersnot Caddy
- Running applications without dedicated DevOps staffnot Caddy
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot Porter
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot Porter
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot Porter
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Porter
- Pricing based on vCPU and memory can be expensive for small projects
- Vendor lock-in to Porter platform despite multi-cloud support
- Limited customization for complex infrastructure requirements
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Porter
$6/month- Standard$undefined/usage
- RAM: $6 per month per GB
- vCPU: $13 per month per vCPU
- Unlimited applications
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Volume discounts available
- All Standard features
- Premium support
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Porter if
- You need rapid deployment.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want multi-cloud support.
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Questions people ask
- Is Porter or Caddy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Porter starts at $6/month and Caddy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Porter or Caddy?
- Caddy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $6/month for Porter and Free for Caddy.
- Does Porter or Caddy run on more platforms?
- Porter runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Caddy for free?
- Yes. Caddy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Porter starts at $6/month.
- What is Porter best used for?
- Porter is most often used for deploying next.js applications with serverless backends, scaling microservices across multiple cloud providers, running applications without dedicated devops staff. Of those, deploying next.js applications with serverless backends and scaling microservices across multiple cloud providers are not what Caddy is typically brought in for.
- What can Porter do that Caddy cannot?
- Porter covers Rapid deployment, Multi-cloud support, Framework agnostic, DevOps automation. Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Porter: How is Porter priced?
Porter uses pay-as-you-go pricing: $6 per month per GB of RAM and $13 per month per vCPU. You only pay for the resources your applications use, not cloud instance capacity.
SourceCaddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
Porter: Does Porter include cloud provider costs?
Porter pricing excludes underlying cloud provider costs (AWS, Azure, GCP), though cloud credits can offset those expenses.
SourceCaddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
Porter: Do startups get special pricing?
Yes, nonprofits receive 50% off standard rates, and startups may qualify for special pricing programs.
SourceCaddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Porter vs Grafana Cloud
- Porter vs Neon
- Porter vs DigitalOcean
- Porter vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Porter vs Pulumi
- Porter vs Fly.io
- Porter vs Anyscale
- Porter vs Fireworks AI
- Porter vs Podman
- Porter vs Railway
- Porter vs Render
- Porter vs Vault
- Porter vs Wiz
- Porter vs Beam Cloud
- Porter vs Cerebrium
- Porter vs DeepInfra
- Porter vs Go
- Porter vs Azure Functions
- Caddy vs Grafana Cloud
- Caddy vs Neon
- Caddy vs DigitalOcean
- Caddy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Fly.io
- Caddy vs Anyscale
- Caddy vs Fireworks AI
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Railway
- Caddy vs Render
- Caddy vs Vault
- Caddy vs Wiz
- Caddy vs Beam Cloud
- Caddy vs Cerebrium
- Caddy vs DeepInfra
- Caddy vs Go
- Caddy vs Azure Functions


