Technology · head to head
Plane vs Sigstore

Sigstore
Cybersecurity
Free public signing and transparency infrastructure for open source artifacts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Plane self-hosted Community edition requires managing your own Docker/Kubernetes infra plus your own PostgreSQL, Redis, and S3-compatible/GCS/MinIO storage; no single-binary install; Sigstore the security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- They diverge on capability: Plane covers Issue tracking, Sigstore covers Fulcio.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Plane and Sigstore actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Plane
- Issue tracking
- Cycles (Sprints)
- Modules
- Views & layouts
- Pages (Docs)
- Analytics
- API access
- Webhooks
Only in Sigstore
- Fulcio
- Rekor
- Keyless signing
- Multi-language clients
- Timestamp authority
- Neutral governance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Plane
- Project and task management with cycles, modules, epics, and initiativesnot Sigstore
- Documentation and knowledge management via workspace wiki tied to project worknot Sigstore
- Sprint planning and issue triagenot Sigstore
- Cross-functional collaboration with analytics and dashboardsnot Sigstore
- Migration target from Jira, Linear, Monday, ClickUp, or Asananot Sigstore
Sigstore
- Open source projects signing releases without running a certificate authoritynot Plane
- Organisations meeting a signed-artifact requirement without buying a signing productnot Plane
- Publishing provenance that a consumer can verify independently of younot Plane
- Self-hosting the same components where a public log is unacceptablenot Plane
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Plane
- Self-hosted Community edition requires managing your own Docker/Kubernetes infra plus your own PostgreSQL, Redis, and S3-compatible/GCS/MinIO storage; no single-binary install
- Cloud Free tier caps at 12 users and 500 AI credits per seat per month
- Substantial feature gating by tier: custom work item types, workspace wiki, time tracking, dashboards, initiatives, teamspaces, and integrations require Pro or above; LDAP, granular access control, and multi-workflow approvals require Enterprise Grid
- Guest-to-paid-member ratio capped at 1:5 on the Pro plan
Sigstore
- The security model depends on somebody watching the log. The documentation states that compromise of an identity provider or of Fulcio itself is detectable only if third parties monitor the transparency log, the monitoring tool is a community-tier rather than core project, and almost no consumer runs one.
- It is a 99.5 percent objective with no service level agreement, which permits several hours of downtime a month and offers no remedy. A pipeline that signs on every build has taken a hard dependency on a free service with no contract behind it.
- Log scale is a live engineering problem rather than a theoretical one. The active shard holds billions of entries, the log has already been sharded twice, and sharding version 1 requires stopping traffic, which is why a replacement was built.
- Ten-minute certificates make trust depend on log availability. Verifying an older signature relies on the log entry proving it was made inside that window, so a lost or unreachable entry can render a valid artifact unverifiable.
- Migration debt is substantial and ongoing. Version 2 of the log is generally available but not the public default, the signing client has an announced breaking release ahead, some official clients lag the new log format, and a post-quantum migration is named as the next break after that.
Pricing, plan by plan
Plane
Free- FreeFree
- 500 AI credits per seat
- Max 12 users
- Unlimited projects
- Pro$6/seat per month
- 1,000 AI credits per seat
- Unlimited users
- Custom work item types
- Business$13/seat per month
- 2,000 AI credits per seat
- Unlimited users
- Project templates, recurring work items
- Enterprise Grid$null/mo
- Flexible AI credit allocation
- Private deployments
- Granular access control
Sigstore
Free- Public good instanceFree
- Free to everyone with no contract
- 99.5 percent availability objective, not an agreement
- 100KB cap per attestation upload
- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0
- Run your own Fulcio and Rekor
- Rekor v2 available for self-hosters
Which should you pick?
Choose Plane if
- You need issue tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want cycles (sprints).
Choose Sigstore if
- You need fulcio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want rekor.
Questions people ask
- Is Plane or Sigstore better?
- Neither clearly leads. Plane starts at Free and Sigstore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Plane or Sigstore?
- Plane starts at Free and Sigstore at Free.
- Does Plane or Sigstore run on more platforms?
- Plane runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows. Sigstore runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Plane for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Plane best used for?
- Plane is most often used for project and task management with cycles, modules, epics, and initiatives, documentation and knowledge management via workspace wiki tied to project work, sprint planning and issue triage, cross-functional collaboration with analytics and dashboards. Of those, project and task management with cycles, modules, epics, and initiatives and documentation and knowledge management via workspace wiki tied to project work are not what Sigstore is typically brought in for.
- What can Plane do that Sigstore cannot?
- Plane covers Issue tracking, Cycles (Sprints), Modules, Views & layouts. Sigstore covers Fulcio, Rekor, Keyless signing, Multi-language clients.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Plane: Does Plane offer a free plan?
Yes, Plane's free tier includes 500 AI credits per seat, support for up to 12 users, and access to projects, work items, cycles, modules, layouts, views, estimates, and pages.
SourceSigstore: Is the public instance really free?
Yes, with no contract and no paid tier. That is also the weakness: a 99.5 percent objective with no agreement, no remedy and support through Slack.
Plane: How much does Plane Pro cost?
Plane Pro costs $6/seat per month and saves 25% when billed annually. It includes 1,000 AI credits per seat, unlimited users, and access to custom work item types, wiki, time tracking, and integrations.
SourceSigstore: Has the public log moved to Rekor v2?
No. Version 2 reached general availability in October 2025 and self-hosters can use it, but the public instance still defaults to version 1 and the project has said it will for the foreseeable future.
Plane: What is the difference between Plane's paid tiers?
Pro ($6/seat/month) includes 1,000 AI credits and workspace wiki. Business ($13/seat/month) adds 2,000 AI credits, project templates, and recurring work items. Enterprise Grid offers custom pricing with multiple workflows and LDAP support.
SourceSigstore: Does Sigstore make my dependencies safe?
No, and this is a category error worth avoiding. It tells you who published something. It has no knowledge of what the artifact contains or whether it is vulnerable.
Sigstore: What are the rate limits?
Not published. Only the 100KB cap per attestation upload is documented, so do not design a high-volume pipeline around assumed throughput.
Sigstore: Should we self-host it?
If a public record of every signature is unacceptable, or if a free service with no agreement cannot sit in your build path, then yes. Otherwise the public instance is what most projects use.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Plane vs Linear
- Plane vs Asana
- Plane vs ClickUp
- Plane vs Figma
- Plane vs Kubernetes
- Plane vs PostHog
- Plane vs Jira
- Plane vs GitHub
- Plane vs Eclipse
- Plane vs Shortcut
- Plane vs Storybook
- Plane vs Mozilla Firefox
- Plane vs Height
- Plane vs Honeycomb
- Plane vs Istio
- Plane vs Lovable
- Plane vs Lucidchart
- Plane vs GitHub Desktop
- Plane vs Cosign
- Plane vs Syft
- Plane vs Logto
- Plane vs Infisical
- Plane vs Chainguard
- Plane vs Ory
- Plane vs OWASP ZAP
- Plane vs Bitwarden
- Plane vs Semgrep
- Plane vs Trivy
- Plane vs authentik
- Plane vs Authelia
- Plane vs Resolver
- Plane vs Saviynt
- Plane vs Securiti
- Plane vs Speakeasy
- Plane vs Sysdig
- Plane vs Tenable
- Sigstore vs Linear
- Sigstore vs Asana
- Sigstore vs ClickUp
- Sigstore vs Figma
- Sigstore vs Kubernetes
- Sigstore vs PostHog
- Sigstore vs Jira
- Sigstore vs GitHub
- Sigstore vs Eclipse
- Sigstore vs Shortcut
- Sigstore vs Storybook
- Sigstore vs Mozilla Firefox
- Sigstore vs Height
- Sigstore vs Honeycomb
- Sigstore vs Istio
- Sigstore vs Lovable
- Sigstore vs Lucidchart
- Sigstore vs GitHub Desktop
- Sigstore vs Cosign
- Sigstore vs Syft
- Sigstore vs Logto
- Sigstore vs Infisical
- Sigstore vs Chainguard
- Sigstore vs Ory
- Sigstore vs OWASP ZAP
- Sigstore vs Bitwarden
- Sigstore vs Semgrep
- Sigstore vs Trivy
- Sigstore vs authentik
- Sigstore vs Authelia
- Sigstore vs Resolver
- Sigstore vs Saviynt
- Sigstore vs Securiti
- Sigstore vs Speakeasy
- Sigstore vs Sysdig
- Sigstore vs Tenable

