Entertainment · head to head
Philo vs Roku

Philo
Entertainment
Cheap entertainment-only live TV streaming with no sports and no local broadcast channels
- From
- $33/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Roku has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Philo there is no sports coverage of any kind, and no add-on exists to get it, so anyone wanting even occasional live sports needs a different service entirely.; Roku roku takes a 20 percent cut of all revenue channel publishers receive through Roku Pay (purchases, subscriptions, ads), paying out the remaining 80 percent no later than 60 days after the end of the month the payment was received, with non-US partners restricted to PayPal or wire transfer (ACH/direct deposit is US-only) and bank fees applying to wire and ACH payouts (archived developer documentation, 2 May 2021)
- They diverge on capability: Philo covers Unlimited cloud DVR, Roku covers Streaming aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Philo and Roku actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Entertainment).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Philo
- Unlimited cloud DVR
- Around 70 channels
- No contracts
- Multiple simultaneous streams
- Low base price
- On-demand library
Only in Roku
- Streaming aggregation
- Free content
- Voice search
- Private listening
- All major streaming apps
- Smart home
- PIN protection
- Parental controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Philo
- A household that gets local news over an antenna and does not need it duplicated in a streaming bundlenot Roku
- Someone who wants reality, lifestyle and general cable channels and has no interest in sports at allnot Roku
- A budget cord-cutter comparing the lowest possible monthly cost among mainstream live TV servicesnot Roku
- A second household or vacation home subscription where a full sports-inclusive bundle is not worth the costnot Roku
Roku
- TV streamingnot Philo
- Content discoverynot Philo
- Free entertainmentnot Philo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Philo
- There is no sports coverage of any kind, and no add-on exists to get it, so anyone wanting even occasional live sports needs a different service entirely.
- It carries no local ABC, CBS, Fox or NBC affiliate feeds, so live local news and network prime time require an antenna or another service.
- The channel count, at around 70, is meaningfully smaller than fuboTV or DirecTV Stream, so genre variety outside entertainment and lifestyle is limited.
- News coverage is thin, with no major 24-hour cable news network included on the base lineup in the way some competitors carry CNN or Fox News.
- Because it deliberately stays in one narrow lane, households whose needs change to include sports have to switch providers entirely rather than upgrading a Philo tier.
Roku
- Roku takes a 20 percent cut of all revenue channel publishers receive through Roku Pay (purchases, subscriptions, ads), paying out the remaining 80 percent no later than 60 days after the end of the month the payment was received, with non-US partners restricted to PayPal or wire transfer (ACH/direct deposit is US-only) and bank fees applying to wire and ACH payouts (archived developer documentation, 2 May 2021)
Pricing, plan by plan
Philo
$33/month- Philo$33/month
- Around 70 entertainment and lifestyle channels
- Unlimited cloud DVR
- No sports or local broadcast channels
Roku
Free- FreeFree
- The Roku Channel
- Free content
- Ad-supported
Which should you pick?
Choose Philo if
- You need unlimited cloud dvr.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV.
- You also want around 70 channels.
Choose Roku if
- You need streaming aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Roku-devices, Smart-tv, Ios, Android.
- You also want free content.
Questions people ask
- Is Philo or Roku better?
- Neither clearly leads. Philo starts at $33/month and Roku at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Philo or Roku?
- Roku has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $33/month for Philo and Free for Roku.
- Does Philo or Roku run on more platforms?
- Philo runs on Web, iOS, Android, Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV. Roku runs on Roku-devices, Smart-tv, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Roku for free?
- Yes. Roku has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Philo starts at $33/month.
- What is Philo best used for?
- Philo is most often used for a household that gets local news over an antenna and does not need it duplicated in a streaming bundle, someone who wants reality, lifestyle and general cable channels and has no interest in sports at all, a budget cord-cutter comparing the lowest possible monthly cost among mainstream live tv services, a second household or vacation home subscription where a full sports-inclusive bundle is not worth the cost. Of those, a household that gets local news over an antenna and does not need it duplicated in a streaming bundle and someone who wants reality, lifestyle and general cable channels and has no interest in sports at all are not what Roku is typically brought in for.
- What can Philo do that Roku cannot?
- Philo covers Unlimited cloud DVR, Around 70 channels, No contracts, Multiple simultaneous streams. Roku covers Streaming aggregation, Free content, Voice search, Private listening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Philo: Does Philo have any sports channels?
No, it excludes sports entirely, including ESPN and regional sports networks, and there is no add-on to get them.
Philo: Does Philo include local channels like ABC or NBC?
No, local broadcast affiliates are not included; you would need an antenna or a different streaming service for those.
Philo: Why is Philo so much cheaper than fuboTV?
Because it excludes the two most expensive categories of content to carry, sports rights and local broadcast retransmission fees.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Philo vs DirecTV Stream
- Philo vs fuboTV
- Philo vs The Roku Channel
- Philo vs Hulu
- Philo vs Pluto TV
- Philo vs StubHub
- Philo vs YouTube TV
- Philo vs Peacock
- Philo vs DaVinci Resolve
- Philo vs Starz
- Philo vs Stitcher
- Philo vs Tubi
- Philo vs VLC
- Philo vs ESPN+
- Philo vs Paramount+
- Philo vs Showtime
- Philo vs Overcast
- Philo vs Castbox
- Philo vs Castro
- Philo vs Apple TV+
- Philo vs Discord
- Philo vs Spotify
- Philo vs Netflix
- Philo vs Criterion Channel
- Philo vs HBO Max
- Philo vs BritBox
- Philo vs Crunchyroll
- Philo vs Dailymotion
- Philo vs Disney+
- Philo vs Discovery+
- Roku vs DirecTV Stream
- Roku vs fuboTV
- Roku vs The Roku Channel
- Roku vs Hulu
- Roku vs Pluto TV
- Roku vs StubHub
- Roku vs YouTube TV
- Roku vs Peacock
- Roku vs DaVinci Resolve
- Roku vs Starz
- Roku vs Stitcher
- Roku vs Tubi
- Roku vs VLC
- Roku vs ESPN+
- Roku vs Paramount+
- Roku vs Showtime
- Roku vs Overcast
- Roku vs Castbox
- Roku vs Castro
- Roku vs Apple TV+
- Roku vs Discord
- Roku vs Spotify
- Roku vs Netflix
- Roku vs Criterion Channel
- Roku vs HBO Max
- Roku vs BritBox
- Roku vs Crunchyroll
- Roku vs Dailymotion
- Roku vs Disney+
- Roku vs Discovery+

