Cloud · head to head
OpenEBS vs Thanos

Thanos
Cloud
Highly available Prometheus with long-term object storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: OpenEBS there is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.; Thanos several components — sidecar, store, querier, compactor, ruler — each with its own configuration and failure modes
- They diverge on capability: OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Thanos covers Global query.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenEBS and Thanos actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenEBS
- Replicated engine
- Local PV engines
- Kubernetes-native management
- Snapshots and clones
- No licence fee
- Hardware independence
Only in Thanos
- Global query
- Object storage retention
- Deduplication
- Downsampling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenEBS
- Running Cassandra or Kafka on Kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficientnot Thanos
- A platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal Kubernetes without a per node subscriptionnot Thanos
- An edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justifiednot Thanos
- Replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a Container Storage Interface drivernot Thanos
Thanos
- Querying metrics across many clusters or regions from one placenot OpenEBS
- Retaining metrics for years without local disk growthnot OpenEBS
- Removing the gap that appears when a single Prometheus instance restartsnot OpenEBS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenEBS
- There is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.
- The project has several storage engines with different maturity and different operational characteristics, and choosing the wrong one for your workload produces poor results that look like a product failure.
- Documentation and upgrade guidance assume real Kubernetes storage knowledge, so teams without that expertise underestimate the operational load they are taking on.
- Project governance shifted after DataCore acquired MayaData in 2021, which means the direction of a supposedly neutral project is influenced by one commercial sponsor.
- Disaster recovery, cross-cluster replication and policy-driven data services are thinner than in the commercial alternatives, so organisations with those requirements end up building them or buying a product anyway.
Thanos
- Several components — sidecar, store, querier, compactor, ruler — each with its own configuration and failure modes
- The compactor is a common source of operational trouble and must not run twice against the same bucket
- Query latency over object storage is meaningfully higher than local Prometheus
- Object storage costs and API request charges become real at high volume
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenEBS
Free- OpenEBSFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All storage engines included
- No node or capacity limits
Thanos
Free- ThanosFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenEBS if
- You need replicated engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want local pv engines.
Choose Thanos if
- You need global query.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker.
- You also want object storage retention.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenEBS or Thanos better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenEBS starts at Free and Thanos at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenEBS or Thanos?
- OpenEBS starts at Free and Thanos at Free.
- Does OpenEBS or Thanos run on more platforms?
- OpenEBS runs on Linux. Thanos runs on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use OpenEBS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is OpenEBS best used for?
- OpenEBS is most often used for running cassandra or kafka on kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficient, a platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal kubernetes without a per node subscription, an edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justified, replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a container storage interface driver. Of those, running cassandra or kafka on kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficient and a platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal kubernetes without a per node subscription are not what Thanos is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenEBS do that Thanos cannot?
- OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Local PV engines, Kubernetes-native management, Snapshots and clones. Thanos covers Global query, Object storage retention, Deduplication, Downsampling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenEBS: Who supports it in production?
The project is community supported. Commercial support is available from DataCore, which acquired the original sponsor MayaData in 2021. Establish that relationship before production, not during an incident.
Thanos: Is Thanos free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-incubating. Costs are the object storage it uses.
OpenEBS: Which engine should we use?
If your application replicates its own data, use a Local engine and avoid replicating twice. If it does not, such as with PostgreSQL, use the Replicated engine.
Thanos: Does Thanos replace Prometheus?
No. It runs alongside existing Prometheus servers, adding global query, deduplication and long-term storage.
OpenEBS: Does it cost anything?
No licence fee. The cost is operational, and a support contract if you want someone accountable.
Thanos: Thanos or VictoriaMetrics?
Thanos layers onto Prometheus using object storage and is the more established multi-cluster answer. VictoriaMetrics is a separate store aiming at lower resource use and fewer moving parts.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenEBS vs Portworx
- OpenEBS vs Rancher
- OpenEBS vs Longhorn
- OpenEBS vs DigitalOcean
- OpenEBS vs Podman
- OpenEBS vs Qovery
- OpenEBS vs Caddy
- OpenEBS vs Cerebrium
- OpenEBS vs DeepInfra
- OpenEBS vs Go
- OpenEBS vs Proxmox VE
- OpenEBS vs K3s
- OpenEBS vs Rook
- OpenEBS vs containerd
- OpenEBS vs minikube
- OpenEBS vs Cilium
- OpenEBS vs Flux
- OpenEBS vs Linkerd
- OpenEBS vs VictoriaMetrics
- OpenEBS vs Grafana Cloud
- OpenEBS vs Zipkin
- OpenEBS vs Vultr
- OpenEBS vs Koyeb
- OpenEBS vs Scaleway
- OpenEBS vs Tencent Cloud
- OpenEBS vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- OpenEBS vs Neon
- OpenEBS vs Pulumi
- OpenEBS vs Upstash
- OpenEBS vs Azure Functions
- OpenEBS vs Deno Deploy
- Thanos vs Portworx
- Thanos vs Rancher
- Thanos vs Longhorn
- Thanos vs DigitalOcean
- Thanos vs Podman
- Thanos vs Qovery
- Thanos vs Caddy
- Thanos vs Cerebrium
- Thanos vs DeepInfra
- Thanos vs Go
- Thanos vs Proxmox VE
- Thanos vs K3s
- Thanos vs Rook
- Thanos vs containerd
- Thanos vs minikube
- Thanos vs Cilium
- Thanos vs Flux
- Thanos vs Linkerd
- Thanos vs VictoriaMetrics
- Thanos vs Grafana Cloud
- Thanos vs Zipkin
- Thanos vs Vultr
- Thanos vs Koyeb
- Thanos vs Scaleway
- Thanos vs Tencent Cloud
- Thanos vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Thanos vs Neon
- Thanos vs Pulumi
- Thanos vs Upstash
- Thanos vs Azure Functions
- Thanos vs Deno Deploy

