Machine Learning · head to head
OpenAI API vs Seldon

OpenAI API
Machine Learning
Hosted API for OpenAI's language, embedding, image and audio models, billed per token
- From
- $0.15/per-million-tokens
- Rated
- -

Seldon
Machine Learning
Kubernetes model serving whose current version is licensed under the Business Source Licence
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Seldon has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenAI API cost scales with tokens rather than with seats, so a successful feature's bill grows with its adoption, and an interface that lets users paste long documents has no natural ceiling on spend unless you build one yourself.; Seldon seldon Core v2 is under the Business Source Licence rather than Apache 2.0, so production use requires a commercial agreement, and a team that evaluated it believing it was open source discovers the licence is the blocker exactly when the project is ready to ship.
- They diverge on capability: OpenAI API covers Text and reasoning models, Seldon covers Kubernetes custom resources.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenAI API and Seldon actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenAI API | Seldon |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0.15/per-million-tokens | Free |
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Api | Linux |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenAI API
- Text and reasoning models
- Embeddings
- Speech and audio
- Image generation
- Function calling
- Structured outputs
- Batch processing
- Prompt caching
Only in Seldon
- Kubernetes custom resources
- Inference graphs
- Traffic strategies
- Open Inference Protocol
- Alibi Explain
- Alibi Detect
- Kafka-backed pipelines in v2
- Commercial control plane
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenAI API
- Adding summarisation, drafting or classification to an existing product where building a model would take longer than the product's whole roadmapnot Seldon
- Retrieval-augmented question answering over internal documents, using the embedding and generation models togethernot Seldon
- Extracting structured records from unstructured text, where schema-constrained output removes most of the parsing problemnot Seldon
- Prototyping a language feature quickly to find out whether it is worth the cost of a self-hosted alternative laternot Seldon
Seldon
- Serving an ensemble or a multi-stage inference path as one versioned deployment rather than as a chain of separate servicesnot OpenAI API
- Running genuine production experiments where a share of live traffic goes to a candidate model and the results are comparednot OpenAI API
- Regulated environments needing explanations and drift monitoring attached to the served model rather than bolted on laternot OpenAI API
- Organisations with an established Kubernetes platform team who want serving expressed as manifests under existing deployment controlsnot OpenAI API
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenAI API
- Cost scales with tokens rather than with seats, so a successful feature's bill grows with its adoption, and an interface that lets users paste long documents has no natural ceiling on spend unless you build one yourself.
- Models are deprecated on the vendor's timetable, and a fine-tuned model built on a retired base goes with it, so the tuning work and the data curation behind it must be redone rather than migrated.
- Behaviour shifts between model versions in ways no test catches unless you wrote one, so prompts tuned over months against a particular snapshot can regress quietly on migration, which makes an evaluation suite a prerequisite rather than an improvement.
- It cannot run inside your own network, so data residency requirements, air-gapped environments and contracts forbidding third-party processing rule it out regardless of the provider's own security posture.
- You inherit its availability and its rate limits, so a provider incident is an outage in your product and a traffic spike can be throttled at precisely the moment the feature is proving itself.
Seldon
- Seldon Core v2 is under the Business Source Licence rather than Apache 2.0, so production use requires a commercial agreement, and a team that evaluated it believing it was open source discovers the licence is the blocker exactly when the project is ready to ship.
- Core v1 remains Apache 2.0 but is in maintenance, so taking the free route means running software that receives no new development while the architecture it belongs to moves on without it.
- Version 2 is a different system rather than a newer release, with different custom resources, a scheduler component and a Kafka-based pipeline model, so migrating from v1 is a re-implementation of every deployment manifest rather than an upgrade.
- Kafka is a dependency for v2 pipelines, so an organisation that does not already operate it takes on a distributed log with its own storage, retention, rebalancing and failure modes purely in order to serve models.
- Everything assumes Kubernetes fluency and the failure modes are Kubernetes failure modes, custom resource version mismatches, an operator that will not reconcile, admission webhooks and resource limits terminating an inference pod mid-request, so it needs a platform engineer rather than a data scientist.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenAI API
$0.15/per-million-tokens- GPT-4o mini$0.15/per-million-input-tokens
- Fast
- Affordable
- GPT-4o$5/per-million-input-tokens
- Multimodal
- 128K context
Seldon
Free- Seldon CoreFree
- Open source
- Kubernetes deployment
- Model serving
- Seldon DeployFree
- Enterprise features
- GUI
- Monitoring
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenAI API if
- You need text and reasoning models.
- You work on Api.
- You also want embeddings.
Choose Seldon if
- You need kubernetes custom resources.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want inference graphs.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenAI API or Seldon better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenAI API starts at $0.15/per-million-tokens and Seldon at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenAI API or Seldon?
- Seldon has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.15/per-million-tokens for OpenAI API and Free for Seldon.
- Does OpenAI API or Seldon run on more platforms?
- OpenAI API runs on Api. Seldon runs on Linux.
- Can I use Seldon for free?
- Yes. Seldon has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OpenAI API starts at $0.15/per-million-tokens.
- What is OpenAI API best used for?
- OpenAI API is most often used for adding summarisation, drafting or classification to an existing product where building a model would take longer than the product's whole roadmap, retrieval-augmented question answering over internal documents, using the embedding and generation models together, extracting structured records from unstructured text, where schema-constrained output removes most of the parsing problem, prototyping a language feature quickly to find out whether it is worth the cost of a self-hosted alternative later. Of those, adding summarisation, drafting or classification to an existing product where building a model would take longer than the product's whole roadmap and retrieval-augmented question answering over internal documents, using the embedding and generation models together are not what Seldon is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenAI API do that Seldon cannot?
- OpenAI API covers Text and reasoning models, Embeddings, Speech and audio, Image generation. Seldon covers Kubernetes custom resources, Inference graphs, Traffic strategies, Open Inference Protocol.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenAI API: Is my data used to train the models?
API inputs and outputs are not used for training by default, which differs from the consumer product. Retention periods and enterprise terms change, so read the current data usage policy rather than trusting a summary.
Seldon: Is Seldon open source?
Partly, and this is the thing to check before you build on it. Core v1 is Apache 2.0 but in maintenance. Core v2 was moved to the Business Source Licence in 2024, which allows evaluation but not unlicensed production use. Verify the current licence of each component you intend to run, including MLServer and the Alibi libraries.
OpenAI API: Can I run these models on my own hardware?
No. The weights are not distributed. If self-hosting is a requirement, you are looking at open-weight models instead, with the operational and quality trade-offs that implies.
Seldon: What is the difference between v1 and v2?
Architecture, not just version number. v2 introduces a scheduler, a different set of custom resources and Kafka-backed pipelines. Manifests, mental model and operations all change, so treat a move as a project.
OpenAI API: How is it priced?
Per token, with input and output priced differently and each model priced differently. Batch processing and cached input prefixes reduce it. The practical consequence is that your bill is a function of prompt design, not just of request count.
Seldon: Do I need Kubernetes?
Yes. It is a Kubernetes-native system and there is no meaningful deployment without a cluster and someone competent to run it.
OpenAI API: What is the difference from Azure OpenAI Service?
The same model family delivered by Microsoft under an Azure contract, with Azure identity, networking and regional controls, and a different release cadence for new models. Enterprises with an Azure agreement often choose it for procurement and data residency reasons rather than technical ones.
Seldon: What is MLServer?
Seldon's Python inference server implementing the Open Inference Protocol, usable inside Seldon deployments or on its own. Check its current licence alongside Core's, since the company has moved projects onto the Business Source Licence.
OpenAI API: How do I keep the cost under control?
Cap input length, cache repeated prefixes, route easy requests to smaller models, use the batch path where latency does not matter, and set per-user limits before launch rather than after the first surprising invoice.
Seldon: Do I have to run Kafka?
For v2 pipelines, yes. If you only need single models served, that dependency is a large amount of infrastructure for the benefit, and a simpler serving layer may be the better answer.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OpenAI API vs Cohere
- OpenAI API vs AWS SageMaker
- OpenAI API vs Google Vertex AI
- OpenAI API vs Azure Machine Learning
- OpenAI API vs DataRobot
- OpenAI API vs Fal AI
- OpenAI API vs BentoML
- OpenAI API vs Snowflake
- OpenAI API vs Hugging Face
- OpenAI API vs Python
- OpenAI API vs Ollama
- OpenAI API vs Neptune.ai
- OpenAI API vs Weka
- OpenAI API vs ClearML
- OpenAI API vs BigQuery ML
- OpenAI API vs Semantic Kernel
- OpenAI API vs Kubeflow
- OpenAI API vs Pachyderm
- OpenAI API vs MLflow
- OpenAI API vs DVC
- OpenAI API vs Weights & Biases
- OpenAI API vs Comet ML
- OpenAI API vs Dataiku
- OpenAI API vs Anaconda
- OpenAI API vs Domino Data Lab
- OpenAI API vs H2O.ai
- Seldon vs Cohere
- Seldon vs AWS SageMaker
- Seldon vs Google Vertex AI
- Seldon vs Azure Machine Learning
- Seldon vs DataRobot
- Seldon vs Fal AI
- Seldon vs BentoML
- Seldon vs Snowflake
- Seldon vs Hugging Face
- Seldon vs Python
- Seldon vs Ollama
- Seldon vs Neptune.ai
- Seldon vs Weka
- Seldon vs ClearML
- Seldon vs BigQuery ML
- Seldon vs Semantic Kernel
- Seldon vs Kubeflow
- Seldon vs Pachyderm
- Seldon vs MLflow
- Seldon vs DVC
- Seldon vs Weights & Biases
- Seldon vs Comet ML
- Seldon vs Dataiku
- Seldon vs Anaconda
- Seldon vs Domino Data Lab
- Seldon vs H2O.ai
