Developer Tools · head to head
Octopus Deploy vs Spacelift

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space; Spacelift users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Octopus Deploy and Spacelift actually diverge.
| Attribute | Octopus Deploy | Spacelift |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | By private worker and tier, not by user |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Self-hosted, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Spacelift does not also cover.
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Spacelift
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Spacelift
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Spacelift
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Spacelift
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Octopus Deploy
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Octopus Deploy
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Octopus Deploy
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Octopus Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between.
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround.
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter Plus$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- Business$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Which should you pick?
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want policy as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Octopus Deploy or Spacelift better?
- Neither clearly leads. Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Spacelift at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Octopus Deploy or Spacelift?
- Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Spacelift at Free.
- Does Octopus Deploy or Spacelift run on more platforms?
- Octopus Deploy runs on Web. Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Octopus Deploy best used for?
- Octopus Deploy is most often used for automating software deployments across development, testing, production, automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response, managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configuration, tracking dora metrics and enforcing deployment approval gates. Of those, automating software deployments across development, testing, production and automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response are not what Spacelift is typically brought in for.
- What can Octopus Deploy do that Spacelift cannot?
- Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Octopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceSpacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Octopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Octopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Octopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceSpacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Spacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs Nix
- Octopus Deploy vs Nixpacks
- Octopus Deploy vs Okteto
- Octopus Deploy vs OpsLevel
- Octopus Deploy vs PartyKit
- Octopus Deploy vs Atlantis
- Octopus Deploy vs Cortex
- Octopus Deploy vs Backstage
- Octopus Deploy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Octopus Deploy vs Azure DevOps
- Octopus Deploy vs ConfigCat
- Octopus Deploy vs Frappe
- Octopus Deploy vs Dagger
- Octopus Deploy vs Deno
- Octopus Deploy vs Fig
- Octopus Deploy vs Git
- Octopus Deploy vs GoLand
- Spacelift vs Visual Studio Code
- Spacelift vs ESLint
- Spacelift vs pnpm
- Spacelift vs Turborepo
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Moonrepo
- Spacelift vs Ansible
- Spacelift vs Argo CD
- Spacelift vs Garden
- Spacelift vs GitLab CI/CD
- Spacelift vs Namespace
- Spacelift vs Nix
- Spacelift vs Nixpacks
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs PartyKit
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs Azure DevOps
- Spacelift vs ConfigCat
- Spacelift vs Frappe
- Spacelift vs Dagger
- Spacelift vs Deno
- Spacelift vs Fig
- Spacelift vs Git
- Spacelift vs GoLand
