Legal · head to head
NetDocuments vs Trivy

Trivy
Cybersecurity
Open-source vulnerability and misconfiguration scanner
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Trivy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NetDocuments quote-only pricing per user with no published rates; Trivy reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- They diverge on capability: NetDocuments covers Matter-centric filing, Trivy covers Multi-target scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NetDocuments and Trivy actually diverge.
| Attribute | NetDocuments | Trivy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android, Cloud | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | Legal | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NetDocuments
- Matter-centric filing
- Ethical walls
- Email management
- Version control
- Search
- Retention
Only in Trivy
- Multi-target scanning
- Vulnerability detection
- Misconfiguration checks
- Secret detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NetDocuments
- Firms needing enforceable ethical walls rather than folder permissionsnot Trivy
- Capturing email into the matter record instead of individual inboxesnot Trivy
- Moving document management off on-premise serversnot Trivy
Trivy
- Failing a pull request when a container image introduces a known CVEnot NetDocuments
- Scanning Terraform and Kubernetes manifests for misconfiguration before applynot NetDocuments
- Catching committed secrets as part of an existing CI stepnot NetDocuments
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NetDocuments
- Quote-only pricing per user with no published rates
- Migrating an existing document store is a substantial project, and legacy metadata rarely survives cleanly
- Aimed at mid-size and large firms; solo practices find it heavier than needed
- Adoption depends on fee earners filing correctly, and habits are the hard part
Trivy
- Reports what public advisory databases know, so coverage varies by ecosystem and unfixed CVEs create noise
- No built-in triage or exception workflow, so suppressing accepted risk is managed in config files
- Findings are point-in-time from CI, with no continuous runtime monitoring unless you add the commercial platform
Pricing, plan by plan
NetDocuments
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the NetDocuments review.
Trivy
Free- TrivyFree
- Full scanner
- Unlimited scans
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose NetDocuments if
- You need matter-centric filing.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- You also want ethical walls.
Choose Trivy if
- You need multi-target scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want vulnerability detection.
Questions people ask
- Is NetDocuments or Trivy better?
- Neither clearly leads. NetDocuments starts at On request and Trivy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NetDocuments or Trivy?
- Trivy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NetDocuments and Free for Trivy.
- Does NetDocuments or Trivy run on more platforms?
- NetDocuments runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android, Cloud. Trivy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Trivy for free?
- Yes. Trivy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NetDocuments starts at On request.
- What is NetDocuments best used for?
- NetDocuments is most often used for firms needing enforceable ethical walls rather than folder permissions, capturing email into the matter record instead of individual inboxes, moving document management off on-premise servers. Of those, firms needing enforceable ethical walls rather than folder permissions and capturing email into the matter record instead of individual inboxes are not what Trivy is typically brought in for.
- What can NetDocuments do that Trivy cannot?
- NetDocuments covers Matter-centric filing, Ethical walls, Email management, Version control. Trivy covers Multi-target scanning, Vulnerability detection, Misconfiguration checks, Secret detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NetDocuments: What does NetDocuments cost?
It quotes per user and does not publish rates.
Trivy: Is Trivy free?
Yes, open source from Aqua Security with no licence fee. Aqua sells a commercial platform around it.
NetDocuments: Why not just use SharePoint or Dropbox?
Neither expresses matter-centric security or ethical walls in an auditable way, which is a professional obligation rather than a preference in legal practice.
Trivy: What can Trivy scan?
Container images, filesystems, Git repositories, Kubernetes clusters and infrastructure-as-code, for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets and licences.
NetDocuments: Does it handle email?
Yes, capturing correspondence into the matter record, which is where most legal email otherwise fails to land.
Trivy: Does Trivy need a server?
No. It is a single binary, which is a large part of why it became a default in CI.
Related pages
More on NetDocuments
Other head to heads
- NetDocuments vs iManage
- NetDocuments vs Clio
- NetDocuments vs Aderant
- NetDocuments vs Intapp
- NetDocuments vs Everlaw
- NetDocuments vs iubenda
- NetDocuments vs Logikcull
- NetDocuments vs Luminance
- NetDocuments vs Docketwise
- NetDocuments vs Litera
- NetDocuments vs MyCase
- NetDocuments vs Ironclad
- NetDocuments vs LexisNexis
- NetDocuments vs Actionstep
- NetDocuments vs DISCO
- NetDocuments vs Grype
- NetDocuments vs Snyk
- NetDocuments vs Chainguard
- NetDocuments vs Semgrep
- NetDocuments vs Bitwarden
- NetDocuments vs Infisical
- NetDocuments vs Authelia
- NetDocuments vs Ory Kratos
- NetDocuments vs HashiCorp Vault
- NetDocuments vs Arnica
- NetDocuments vs OWASP ZAP
- NetDocuments vs Proton Mail
- NetDocuments vs Veriff
- NetDocuments vs Brave Browser
- NetDocuments vs March Networks
- NetDocuments vs Salient CompleteView
- NetDocuments vs Sumsub
- NetDocuments vs Syft
- Trivy vs iManage
- Trivy vs Clio
- Trivy vs Aderant
- Trivy vs Intapp
- Trivy vs Everlaw
- Trivy vs iubenda
- Trivy vs Logikcull
- Trivy vs Luminance
- Trivy vs Docketwise
- Trivy vs Litera
- Trivy vs MyCase
- Trivy vs Ironclad
- Trivy vs LexisNexis
- Trivy vs Actionstep
- Trivy vs DISCO
- Trivy vs Grype
- Trivy vs Snyk
- Trivy vs Chainguard
- Trivy vs Semgrep
- Trivy vs Bitwarden
- Trivy vs Infisical
- Trivy vs Authelia
- Trivy vs Ory Kratos
- Trivy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trivy vs Arnica
- Trivy vs OWASP ZAP
- Trivy vs Proton Mail
- Trivy vs Veriff
- Trivy vs Brave Browser
- Trivy vs March Networks
- Trivy vs Salient CompleteView
- Trivy vs Sumsub
- Trivy vs Syft

