Networking · head to head
Nebula vs Vault

Nebula
Networking
Certificate based overlay network from Slack, with identity and firewall rules carried in the certificate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nebula the open source project has no user interface, no enrolment workflow and no revocation service, so certificate issuing, distribution and expiry become scripts you write and then have to keep working.; Vault vault 1.15.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1, not an OSI open source licence, with IBM Corporation as licensor
- They diverge on capability: Nebula covers Certificate carried identity, Vault covers Secrets management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nebula and Vault actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nebula
- Certificate carried identity
- Group based host firewall
- Lighthouse discovery
- Noise protocol encryption
- Unsafe routes
- Managed option
Only in Vault
- Secrets management
- Encryption
- Authentication
- Authorization
- Audit logging
- API access
- High availability
- Replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nebula
- Flattening a network across several clouds and datacentres without VPC peering or route tablesnot Vault
- Very large fleets where a central policy service on the connection path is unacceptablenot Vault
- Environments that already run an internal certificate authority and want the network to use itnot Vault
- Replacing per host iptables rules with policy written against roles that follow the hostnot Vault
Vault
- Centrally storing and rotating secrets, API keys and database credentialsnot Nebula
- Issuing short-lived dynamic credentials to applications instead of static passwordsnot Nebula
- Encryption as a service and PKI certificate issuancenot Nebula
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nebula
- The open source project has no user interface, no enrolment workflow and no revocation service, so certificate issuing, distribution and expiry become scripts you write and then have to keep working.
- Revoking a compromised host means distributing a blocklist entry to every other host and reloading them, which is a fleet wide operation rather than a click, and easy to get wrong under pressure.
- Changing a host group membership means reissuing and redeploying its certificate, so policy changes are a deployment rather than a configuration edit.
- There is no identity provider integration or single sign on in the open source version, so it maps well to servers and badly to a fleet of user laptops.
- NAT traversal is best effort and hosts behind symmetric NAT need a relay configured deliberately, so connectivity failures show up as intermittent rather than immediate and are awkward to diagnose.
Vault
- Vault 1.15.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1, not an OSI open source licence, with IBM Corporation as licensor
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vault to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vault
- Each version only converts to MPL 2.0 four years after that version is published, and the Change Date is tracked per version
- Replication, HSM support, namespaces, performance standby nodes, FIPS builds, control group authorisation, multi-factor authentication, secrets sync and lease count quotas all require a Vault Enterprise licence
- A Vault Enterprise licence must be applied to the cluster before any Enterprise feature can be used
Pricing, plan by plan
Nebula
Free- NebulaFree
- Full functionality under the MIT licence
- No host limit
- You operate the certificate authority and lighthouses
- Defined Networking$undefined/month
- Hosted control plane and enrolment
- Managed certificate lifecycle and revocation
- Policy and DNS interface
Vault
Free- Open SourceFree
- Secrets management
- Encryption as a service
- Identity management
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced features
- Premium support
- Dedicated updates
Which should you pick?
Choose Nebula if
- You need certificate carried identity.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, FreeBSD.
- You also want group based host firewall.
Choose Vault if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Nebula or Vault better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nebula starts at Free and Vault at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nebula or Vault?
- Nebula starts at Free and Vault at Free.
- Does Nebula or Vault run on more platforms?
- Nebula runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, FreeBSD. Vault runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- Can I use Nebula for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Nebula best used for?
- Nebula is most often used for flattening a network across several clouds and datacentres without vpc peering or route tables, very large fleets where a central policy service on the connection path is unacceptable, environments that already run an internal certificate authority and want the network to use it, replacing per host iptables rules with policy written against roles that follow the host. Of those, flattening a network across several clouds and datacentres without vpc peering or route tables and very large fleets where a central policy service on the connection path is unacceptable are not what Vault is typically brought in for.
- What can Nebula do that Vault cannot?
- Nebula covers Certificate carried identity, Group based host firewall, Lighthouse discovery, Noise protocol encryption. Vault covers Secrets management, Encryption, Authentication, Authorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nebula: Does it use WireGuard?
No. Nebula predates the common WireGuard mesh tools and uses the Noise protocol framework with its own certificate format.
Vault: Is HashiCorp Vault free to use?
Yes, Vault is available as a free, open-source project. The community version includes secrets management, certificate generation and rotation, encryption services, and credential management. Vault Enterprise is a commercial offering with additional features.
SourceNebula: Can I run it without Defined Networking?
Yes, entirely. Defined Networking sells the control plane conveniences, not the network itself.
Vault: What are the differences between open-source Vault and Vault Enterprise?
Open-source Vault is free and self-hosted. Vault Enterprise includes additional features and commercial support. HashiCorp also offers Vault Dedicated on the HashiCorp Cloud Platform as a fully managed cloud option.
SourceNebula: How do I revoke a host?
Add its certificate fingerprint to the blocklist in the configuration of the other hosts and reload them. There is no online revocation check.
Vault: Can I try HashiCorp Cloud Platform Vault without payment?
Yes, HashiCorp offers a free trial option for HCP Vault Dedicated. New users also receive a $500 credit to use across HashiCorp Cloud Platform services.
SourceNebula: Is it a good fit for laptops?
Less so than the identity provider based tools. There is no single sign on, so every laptop needs a certificate issued and renewed by whatever process you build.
Vault: What does Vault manage and protect?
Vault provides identity-based secrets management for users, machines, services, and AI agents. It automates authentication and authorization for access to secrets, passwords, certificates, encryption keys, and other sensitive data across your infrastructure.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Nebula vs NetBird
- Nebula vs Tailscale
- Nebula vs pfSense
- Nebula vs Icinga
- Nebula vs Zabbix
- Nebula vs Consul
- Nebula vs LibreNMS
- Nebula vs OpenVPN
- Nebula vs Headscale
- Nebula vs Traefik
- Nebula vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Nebula vs Cisco Meraki
- Nebula vs Domotz
- Nebula vs HiveMQ
- Nebula vs Netdata
- Nebula vs OPNsense
- Nebula vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Nebula vs DigitalOcean
- Nebula vs Grafana Cloud
- Nebula vs Neon
- Nebula vs Crossplane
- Nebula vs Microsoft Azure
- Nebula vs Podman
- Nebula vs Hetzner Cloud
- Nebula vs Linode
- Nebula vs Vultr
- Nebula vs Akamai
- Nebula vs Alibaba Cloud
- Nebula vs CapRover
- Nebula vs Chef
- Nebula vs Buildah
- Vault vs NetBird
- Vault vs Tailscale
- Vault vs pfSense
- Vault vs Icinga
- Vault vs Zabbix
- Vault vs Consul
- Vault vs LibreNMS
- Vault vs OpenVPN
- Vault vs Headscale
- Vault vs Traefik
- Vault vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Vault vs Cisco Meraki
- Vault vs Domotz
- Vault vs HiveMQ
- Vault vs Netdata
- Vault vs OPNsense
- Vault vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vault vs DigitalOcean
- Vault vs Grafana Cloud
- Vault vs Neon
- Vault vs Crossplane
- Vault vs Microsoft Azure
- Vault vs Podman
- Vault vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vault vs Linode
- Vault vs Vultr
- Vault vs Akamai
- Vault vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vault vs CapRover
- Vault vs Chef
- Vault vs Buildah

