Databases · head to head
Microsoft SQL Server vs SolarWinds

Microsoft SQL Server
Databases
Enterprise-grade relational database management system
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Microsoft SQL Server has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft SQL Server licensing and on-premises deployment costs are high compared to open-source alternatives, with Enterprise Edition exceeding $60,000 for minimum core requirements; SolarWinds website uses outdated NetObjects Fusion 2015 tools, suggesting legacy technical infrastructure
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft SQL Server covers T-SQL, SolarWinds covers Real-time monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft SQL Server and SolarWinds actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft SQL Server | SolarWinds |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2/kW/month |
| Pricing model | Unknown | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows Server, Linux (RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu), Docker, Azure | Web, Mobile, Api |
| Category | Databases | Energy |
| Founded | 1989 | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft SQL Server
- T-SQL
- ACID Compliance
- Advanced Security
- In-memory OLTP
- Columnstore Indexes
- Always On Availability
- Machine Learning Services
- Azure
Only in SolarWinds
- Real-time monitoring
- Performance analytics
- Alarm management
- O&M workflows
- Reporting
- Benchmarking
- Weather integration
- Financial tracking
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft SQL Server
- Transaction processingnot SolarWinds
- Data storagenot SolarWinds
- Application backendnot SolarWinds
- Reportingnot SolarWinds
- Data analyticsnot SolarWinds
SolarWinds
- Solar monitoringnot Microsoft SQL Server
- Performance optimizationnot Microsoft SQL Server
- O&M managementnot Microsoft SQL Server
- Portfolio reportingnot Microsoft SQL Server
- Investor reportingnot Microsoft SQL Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft SQL Server
- Licensing and on-premises deployment costs are high compared to open-source alternatives, with Enterprise Edition exceeding $60,000 for minimum core requirements
- Performance monitoring toolset is insufficient for hybrid cloud environments requiring real-time analytics across multiple deployment types
- Heavy I/O resource consumption can saturate disk volumes and degrade performance when processing large transaction workloads
- Always On availability groups with up to 8 secondary replicas are limited to Enterprise edition only; Standard supports only basic availability groups with 2 replicas
- CPU and memory scaling is capped at 4 sockets or 32 cores on Standard edition, limiting deployments requiring higher compute capacity
SolarWinds
- Website uses outdated NetObjects Fusion 2015 tools, suggesting legacy technical infrastructure
- No specific product models, brands, or technical specifications listed for offered solutions
- Geographic service area boundaries unclear; only mentions San Francisco Bay Area and Central California
- Minimal customer engagement features; lacks testimonials, project galleries, financing calculators, or online quote forms
- Email contact discrepancy between display text ([email protected]) and actual mailto link ([email protected])
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft SQL Server
Free- ExpressFree
- 4 cores maximum
- 1.4 GB memory per instance
- 50 GB database size limit
- DeveloperFree
- All Enterprise features
- Non-production use only
- Standard$3945/per 2-core pack
- 32 core maximum per instance
- 256 GB buffer pool memory
- Basic availability groups with 2 replicas
- Enterprise$15123/per 2-core pack
- Unlimited scaling
- Always On with up to 8 secondaries
- Advanced security and HA features
SolarWinds
$2/kW/month- Monitor$2/kW/month
- Real-time monitoring
- Performance tracking
- Alerts
- Optimize$4/kW/month
- Advanced analytics
- Degradation analysis
- Benchmarking
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Portfolio management
- Custom integrations
- Financial modeling
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft SQL Server if
- You need t-sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows Server, Linux (RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu), Docker, Azure.
- You also want acid compliance.
Choose SolarWinds if
- You need real-time monitoring.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want performance analytics.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft SQL Server or SolarWinds better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft SQL Server starts at Free and SolarWinds at $2/kW/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft SQL Server or SolarWinds?
- Microsoft SQL Server has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Microsoft SQL Server and $2/kW/month for SolarWinds.
- Does Microsoft SQL Server or SolarWinds run on more platforms?
- Microsoft SQL Server runs on Windows Server, Linux (RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu), Docker, Azure. SolarWinds runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
- Can I use Microsoft SQL Server for free?
- Yes. Microsoft SQL Server has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SolarWinds starts at $2/kW/month.
- What is Microsoft SQL Server best used for?
- Microsoft SQL Server is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what SolarWinds is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft SQL Server do that SolarWinds cannot?
- Microsoft SQL Server covers T-SQL, ACID Compliance, Advanced Security, In-memory OLTP. SolarWinds covers Real-time monitoring, Performance analytics, Alarm management, O&M workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft SQL Server: What is the pricing model for SQL Server?
SQL Server uses core-based licensing with per-2-core pack pricing. Enterprise Edition costs approximately $15,123 per 2-core pack (minimum 8 cores). Standard Edition costs approximately $3,945 per 2-core pack. Developer and Express editions are free. Software Assurance adds 25-35% annually for upgrades and support.
SourceSolarWinds: What geographic areas does SolarWinds Energy serve?
SolarWinds Energy serves the San Francisco Bay Area and Central California regions, but the exact service area boundaries are not clearly defined on their website.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: Does SQL Server run on Linux?
Yes. SQL Server 2017 and later run on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Ubuntu), Docker containers, and Windows with feature parity including Always On availability groups, Active Directory authentication, and encryption.
SourceSolarWinds: What solar and renewable products does SolarWinds Energy offer?
SolarWinds Energy specializes in energy efficiency and renewable technologies including solar energy systems and attic ventilation solutions, but specific product models and technical specifications are not published online.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: Is there a free edition of SQL Server?
Yes. SQL Server Express is free and includes all functionality of Enterprise edition for development and testing, with limits of 4 cores, 1,410 MB memory per instance, and 50 GB per database. Developer edition is also free for non-production use.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: Can SQL Server be deployed offline?
Yes. SQL Server can be installed from offline media on machines without internet access. Microsoft provides complete offline installation packages for SQL Server, SSMS, and supporting components, making deployment in isolated or air-gapped environments feasible.
SourceMicrosoft SQL Server: What high availability options does SQL Server provide?
SQL Server offers Always On availability groups (Enterprise only), Always On failover cluster instances, database mirroring, log shipping, and for disaster recovery, failover servers in Azure and Accelerated Database Recovery for faster recovery after failures.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft SQL Server
Other head to heads
- Microsoft SQL Server vs IBM Db2
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Oracle Database
- Microsoft SQL Server vs PostgreSQL
- Microsoft SQL Server vs MariaDB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs ClickHouse
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Google Cloud SQL
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Apache Flink
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Couchbase
- Microsoft SQL Server vs DuckDB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs DataGrip
- Microsoft SQL Server vs SingleStore
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Canary Labs
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Chroma
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Cloudinary
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Convex
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Dgraph
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Dragonfly
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Apache Solr
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Enphase Enlighten
- Microsoft SQL Server vs SMA Energy
- Microsoft SQL Server vs ABB Ability
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Aurora Solar
- Microsoft SQL Server vs SunPower Monitoring
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Wattwatchers EMS
- Microsoft SQL Server vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Helioscope
- Microsoft SQL Server vs SAP for Utilities
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- Microsoft SQL Server vs EnergyCAP
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Petrel E&P Software
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Siemens EnergyIP
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Microsoft SQL Server vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Microsoft SQL Server vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- SolarWinds vs IBM Db2
- SolarWinds vs Oracle Database
- SolarWinds vs PostgreSQL
- SolarWinds vs MariaDB
- SolarWinds vs ClickHouse
- SolarWinds vs Google Cloud SQL
- SolarWinds vs Apache Flink
- SolarWinds vs Couchbase
- SolarWinds vs DuckDB
- SolarWinds vs DataGrip
- SolarWinds vs SingleStore
- SolarWinds vs Canary Labs
- SolarWinds vs Chroma
- SolarWinds vs Cloudinary
- SolarWinds vs Convex
- SolarWinds vs Dgraph
- SolarWinds vs Dragonfly
- SolarWinds vs Apache Solr
- SolarWinds vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- SolarWinds vs Enphase Enlighten
- SolarWinds vs SMA Energy
- SolarWinds vs ABB Ability
- SolarWinds vs Aurora Solar
- SolarWinds vs SunPower Monitoring
- SolarWinds vs Wattwatchers EMS
- SolarWinds vs iHawk by Cyberhawk
- SolarWinds vs Helioscope
- SolarWinds vs SAP for Utilities
- SolarWinds vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- SolarWinds vs EnergyCAP
- SolarWinds vs Petrel E&P Software
- SolarWinds vs Siemens EnergyIP
- SolarWinds vs Azelio Energy Storage
- SolarWinds vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- SolarWinds vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- SolarWinds vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
