CAD · head to head
Redshift vs SolveSpace
SolveSpace
CAD
Open source parametric CAD with a constraint solver in a few megabytes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only SolveSpace has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Redshift no specific pricing amounts published on product page; SolveSpace the in-house geometry kernel fails on complex boolean operations and fillets, and the failure is sometimes silent bad geometry rather than an error message, so models must be checked before export or manufacture.
- They diverge on capability: Redshift covers GPU rendering, SolveSpace covers Constraint solver.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Redshift and SolveSpace actually diverge.
| Attribute | Redshift | SolveSpace |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Windows, MacOS, Linux), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Redshift
- GPU rendering
- Out-of-core rendering
- Proxy system
- AOVs
- Motion blur
- Production shading
- Maya
- 3ds Max
Only in SolveSpace
- Constraint solver
- Solid modelling
- Assemblies
- Export formats
- Cross-platform
- Small footprint
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Redshift
- 3D rendering and visualizationnot SolveSpace
- GPU-accelerated ray tracingnot SolveSpace
- Multi-GPU rendering up to 8 GPUs per machinenot SolveSpace
SolveSpace
- Designing 3D printed parts on a machine that cannot run mainstream CADnot Redshift
- Teaching constraint-based parametric modelling without buying licences for a classroomnot Redshift
- Checking that a mechanical linkage moves as intended before cutting metalnot Redshift
- Producing dimensionally accurate STEP or STL output from a small open source toolchainnot Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Redshift
- No specific pricing amounts published on product page
- Only 14-day free trial duration mentioned; no longer-term free tier
- Must contact sales team for subscription cost details
SolveSpace
- The in-house geometry kernel fails on complex boolean operations and fillets, and the failure is sometimes silent bad geometry rather than an error message, so models must be checked before export or manufacture.
- There is no proper drawing and dimensioning workflow, so manufacturing documentation has to be produced in another application.
- Development is volunteer-led and intermittent; long gaps between releases are normal and there is no support contract available at any price.
- Assembly-level import of external CAD is very limited, so it does not fit a supply chain that exchanges native or assembly-level models with suppliers.
- The interface follows its own conventions rather than mainstream CAD ones, so existing SolidWorks or Fusion users spend time unlearning habits for a tool with a lower ceiling.
Pricing, plan by plan
Redshift
$29/month- Redshift$45/month
- Full GPU rendering
- Maxon One$149.91/month
- Redshift + C4D + ZBrush
SolveSpace
Free- SolveSpaceFree
- Full application under the GPL
- No seat limit
- Windows, macOS and Linux builds
Which should you pick?
Choose Redshift if
- You need gpu rendering.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want out-of-core rendering.
Choose SolveSpace if
- You need constraint solver.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want solid modelling.
Questions people ask
- Is Redshift or SolveSpace better?
- Neither clearly leads. Redshift starts at $29/month and SolveSpace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Redshift or SolveSpace?
- SolveSpace has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Redshift and Free for SolveSpace.
- Does Redshift or SolveSpace run on more platforms?
- Redshift runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. SolveSpace runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use SolveSpace for free?
- Yes. SolveSpace has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Redshift starts at $29/month.
- What is Redshift best used for?
- Redshift is most often used for 3d rendering and visualization, gpu-accelerated ray tracing, multi-gpu rendering up to 8 gpus per machine. Of those, 3d rendering and visualization and gpu-accelerated ray tracing are not what SolveSpace is typically brought in for.
- What can Redshift do that SolveSpace cannot?
- Redshift covers GPU rendering, Out-of-core rendering, Proxy system, AOVs. SolveSpace covers Constraint solver, Solid modelling, Assemblies, Export formats.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Redshift: What is included with a Redshift subscription?
Redshift Subscription includes all integration plugins and capability for multiple instances up to 8 GPUs on a single computer. Specific features beyond rendering engine not detailed in public pricing documentation.
SourceSolveSpace: Is it really free for commercial work?
Yes. It is released under the GPL with no licence fee and no seat limit. Support is community only.
Redshift: How long is the Redshift trial period?
Redshift offers a 14-day free trial for users to evaluate the software before purchase commitment.
SourceSolveSpace: Can it replace Fusion 360 or SolidWorks?
No. It handles parts and simple assemblies well. Complex geometry, drawings and supply chain interoperability are outside its range.
Redshift: Where can I find Redshift pricing details?
Specific pricing is available through Redshift store access or by contacting the sales team directly. Pricing amounts are not listed on the public product page.
SourceSolveSpace: What hardware does it need?
Very little. It runs on old laptops and small Linux machines where mainstream CAD will not start.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Redshift vs V-Ray
- Redshift vs KeyShot
- Redshift vs FreeCAD
- Redshift vs Enscape
- Redshift vs Octane Render
- Redshift vs Arnold
- Redshift vs Modo
- Redshift vs Lumion
- Redshift vs D5 Render
- Redshift vs LightWave 3D
- Redshift vs Ultimaker Cura
- Redshift vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Redshift vs Carlson Software
- Redshift vs CATIA
- Redshift vs Corona Renderer
- Redshift vs Mudbox
- Redshift vs OnShape
- Redshift vs Creo
- Redshift vs Alibre Design
- Redshift vs Bambu Studio
- Redshift vs IronCAD
- Redshift vs OpenSCAD
- Redshift vs Zoo
- Redshift vs Bentley MicroStation
- Redshift vs CloudCompare
- Redshift vs KiCad
- Redshift vs PrusaSlicer
- SolveSpace vs V-Ray
- SolveSpace vs KeyShot
- SolveSpace vs FreeCAD
- SolveSpace vs Enscape
- SolveSpace vs Octane Render
- SolveSpace vs Arnold
- SolveSpace vs Modo
- SolveSpace vs Lumion
- SolveSpace vs D5 Render
- SolveSpace vs LightWave 3D
- SolveSpace vs Ultimaker Cura
- SolveSpace vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- SolveSpace vs Carlson Software
- SolveSpace vs CATIA
- SolveSpace vs Corona Renderer
- SolveSpace vs Mudbox
- SolveSpace vs OnShape
- SolveSpace vs Creo
- SolveSpace vs Alibre Design
- SolveSpace vs Bambu Studio
- SolveSpace vs IronCAD
- SolveSpace vs OpenSCAD
- SolveSpace vs Zoo
- SolveSpace vs Bentley MicroStation
- SolveSpace vs CloudCompare
- SolveSpace vs KiCad
- SolveSpace vs PrusaSlicer

