Cybersecurity · head to head
March Networks vs Polco

March Networks
Cybersecurity
Banking and retail video with transaction overlay, sold by a Canadian firm that changed from Chinese to Taiwanese ownership
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: March Networks the ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.; Polco interface has a formal, academic tone compared to modern civic engagement platforms
- They diverge on capability: March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Polco covers Scientific Surveys.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which March Networks and Polco actually diverge.
| Attribute | March Networks | Polco |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $300/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web, Ios, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in March Networks
- Command Enterprise
- Searchlight
- Hybrid recording
- X-Series hybrid NVRs
- Health monitoring
- ATM and teller integration
- Retail loss prevention analytics
- Evidence export
Only in Polco
- Scientific Surveys
- Live Polling
- Community Benchmarking
- Priority-Based Budgeting
- Demographic Analysis
- NRC Surveys
- ArcGIS
- Social Media
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
March Networks
- A bank investigating a disputed ATM withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timelinenot Polco
- A credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and IP cameras must coexist on one recordernot Polco
- A restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locationsnot Polco
- A transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the networknot Polco
Polco
- Citizen Servicesnot March Networks
- Records Managementnot March Networks
- Public Safetynot March Networks
- Civic Engagementnot March Networks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
March Networks
- The ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- NDAA compliance is stated at the product level and rests on American system-on-chip processors in the majority of cameras and in specific recorder lines, which means it must be confirmed per model rather than assumed across the catalogue.
- The platform is engineered around banking and retail workflows, so buyers outside those verticals pay for transaction integration they will never use and get a less developed general security experience than from a Genetec or Milestone.
- No pricing is published and everything is quoted through integrators, so a multi-hundred-site estate cannot be budgeted without a design exercise and there is no benchmark against which to test a quote.
- Hybrid recording means a recorder in every branch, which is hardware to install, monitor, service and eventually replace at every location, and that refresh cycle is a recurring capital event that cloud rivals avoid entirely.
Polco
- Interface has a formal, academic tone compared to modern civic engagement platforms
- Emphasizes surveys and benchmarking over open discussion forums and idea boards
- Pricing is custom quote-based without transparent pricing on the website
Pricing, plan by plan
March Networks
On request- Command Enterprise and Searchlight$undefined/year
- Per-recorder and per-channel licensing quoted through integrators
- Searchlight business intelligence licensed separately
- X-Series hybrid recorders purchased per site
Polco
$300/month- Community Engagement$300/month
- Community Surveys
- Live Polling
- Benchmarking
Which should you pick?
Choose March Networks if
- You need command enterprise.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want searchlight.
Choose Polco if
- You need scientific surveys.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want live polling.
Questions people ask
- Is March Networks or Polco better?
- Neither clearly leads. March Networks starts at On request and Polco at $300/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, March Networks or Polco?
- March Networks starts at On request and Polco at $300/month.
- Does March Networks or Polco run on more platforms?
- March Networks runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Polco runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is March Networks best used for?
- March Networks is most often used for a bank investigating a disputed atm withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timeline, a credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and ip cameras must coexist on one recorder, a restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locations, a transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the network. Of those, a bank investigating a disputed atm withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timeline and a credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and ip cameras must coexist on one recorder are not what Polco is typically brought in for.
- What can March Networks do that Polco cannot?
- March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Searchlight, Hybrid recording, X-Series hybrid NVRs. Polco covers Scientific Surveys, Live Polling, Community Benchmarking, Priority-Based Budgeting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
March Networks: Who owns March Networks?
Delta Electronics of Taiwan, which acquired it in December 2021 for 114 million US dollars. Before that it was owned by Chinese manufacturer Infinova, which by January 2020 had a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder.
Polco: How does Polco ensure survey data quality?
Polco uses scientific survey methodology through the National Research Center, with pre-tested survey questions and verification that participants live in the surveyed area to eliminate outside interference and bad-faith responses.
SourceMarch Networks: Is March Networks NDAA compliant?
The company states it is, citing American system-on-chip processors in the majority of its cameras and in its Command Recording Server bundles and X-Series hybrid NVRs. Verify per model, and expect the ownership history to be raised in a federal procurement review.
Polco: What's the difference between Polco and open discussion platforms?
Polco emphasizes scientific surveys and benchmarking over open forums or suggestion boards, prioritizing rigorous data collection for policy decisions over broad community brainstorming.
SourceMarch Networks: What is Searchlight?
The layer that overlays ATM, teller and point of sale transaction data on video so investigators search by transaction rather than by time.
March Networks: Is video stored in the cloud?
No, it is hybrid. Video is recorded on a recorder at each site and only required clips move centrally, which is why it suits large branch estates on modest connections.
Related pages
More on March Networks
Other head to heads
- March Networks vs Envysion
- March Networks vs Eagle Eye Networks
- March Networks vs Dahua Technology
- March Networks vs Genetec Security Center
- March Networks vs DTiQ
- March Networks vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- March Networks vs Salient CompleteView
- March Networks vs Hanwha Vision
- March Networks vs Milestone XProtect
- March Networks vs Camio
- March Networks vs Rhombus Systems
- March Networks vs ExpressVPN
- March Networks vs Fortinet FortiGate
- March Networks vs HID Global
- March Networks vs IBM QRadar
- March Networks vs Jamf Pro
- March Networks vs Keeper Password Manager
- March Networks vs Keygen
- March Networks vs CivicPlus
- March Networks vs PublicInput
- March Networks vs Granicus
- March Networks vs mySidewalk
- March Networks vs Zencity
- March Networks vs Accela
- March Networks vs CitizenLab
- March Networks vs Bonfire
- March Networks vs CentralSquare
- March Networks vs CityView
- March Networks vs IAPro
- March Networks vs iCompass
- March Networks vs Mapbox Government
- March Networks vs Mark43
- March Networks vs MuckRock
- March Networks vs Municode
- March Networks vs Bang the Table
- March Networks vs Legistar
- Polco vs Envysion
- Polco vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Polco vs Dahua Technology
- Polco vs Genetec Security Center
- Polco vs DTiQ
- Polco vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Polco vs Salient CompleteView
- Polco vs Hanwha Vision
- Polco vs Milestone XProtect
- Polco vs Camio
- Polco vs Rhombus Systems
- Polco vs ExpressVPN
- Polco vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Polco vs HID Global
- Polco vs IBM QRadar
- Polco vs Jamf Pro
- Polco vs Keeper Password Manager
- Polco vs Keygen
- Polco vs CivicPlus
- Polco vs PublicInput
- Polco vs Granicus
- Polco vs mySidewalk
- Polco vs Zencity
- Polco vs Accela
- Polco vs CitizenLab
- Polco vs Bonfire
- Polco vs CentralSquare
- Polco vs CityView
- Polco vs IAPro
- Polco vs iCompass
- Polco vs Mapbox Government
- Polco vs Mark43
- Polco vs MuckRock
- Polco vs Municode
- Polco vs Bang the Table
- Polco vs Legistar

