Cybersecurity · head to head
March Networks vs Mullvad VPN

March Networks
Cybersecurity
Banking and retail video with transaction overlay, sold by a Canadian firm that changed from Chinese to Taiwanese ownership
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Mullvad VPN
Cybersecurity
Privacy-first VPN with one flat price and no email required to sign up
- From
- $5/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: March Networks the ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.; Mullvad VPN offers no free trial or free tier, unlike several consumer VPN competitors.
- They diverge on capability: March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Mullvad VPN covers Flat single pricing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which March Networks and Mullvad VPN actually diverge.
| Attribute | March Networks | Mullvad VPN |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $5/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | windows, mac, linux, ios, android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2009 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in March Networks
- Command Enterprise
- Searchlight
- Hybrid recording
- X-Series hybrid NVRs
- Health monitoring
- ATM and teller integration
- Retail loss prevention analytics
- Evidence export
Only in Mullvad VPN
- Flat single pricing
- Account-number signup
- Cash and crypto payments
- WireGuard support
- Independent audits
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
March Networks
- A bank investigating a disputed ATM withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timelinenot Mullvad VPN
- A credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and IP cameras must coexist on one recordernot Mullvad VPN
- A restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locationsnot Mullvad VPN
- A transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the networknot Mullvad VPN
Mullvad VPN
- Paying for a VPN anonymously with cash or cryptocurrencynot March Networks
- Avoiding tiered upsells with a single flat-rate plannot March Networks
- Signing up without providing an email addressnot March Networks
- Verifying a provider's privacy claims via independent auditsnot March Networks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
March Networks
- The ownership history is a live compliance question: Chinese-owned via Infinova from 2011, with a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder by January 2020, before the December 2021 sale to Delta Electronics of Taiwan, and any US federal or contractor buyer should expect to document that chain during a procurement review.
- NDAA compliance is stated at the product level and rests on American system-on-chip processors in the majority of cameras and in specific recorder lines, which means it must be confirmed per model rather than assumed across the catalogue.
- The platform is engineered around banking and retail workflows, so buyers outside those verticals pay for transaction integration they will never use and get a less developed general security experience than from a Genetec or Milestone.
- No pricing is published and everything is quoted through integrators, so a multi-hundred-site estate cannot be budgeted without a design exercise and there is no benchmark against which to test a quote.
- Hybrid recording means a recorder in every branch, which is hardware to install, monitor, service and eventually replace at every location, and that refresh cycle is a recurring capital event that cloud rivals avoid entirely.
Mullvad VPN
- Offers no free trial or free tier, unlike several consumer VPN competitors.
- Lacks a bundled tiered structure, so there is no cheaper limited plan for occasional users.
- Server network and streaming-unblocking performance is smaller than large mainstream VPN providers.
- No annual discount, meaning long-term subscribers pay the same monthly rate as short-term users.
Pricing, plan by plan
March Networks
On request- Command Enterprise and Searchlight$undefined/year
- Per-recorder and per-channel licensing quoted through integrators
- Searchlight business intelligence licensed separately
- X-Series hybrid recorders purchased per site
Mullvad VPN
$5/month- Mullvad VPN$5/month
- Flat rate regardless of subscription length
- 5 simultaneous devices
- No email required
Which should you pick?
Choose March Networks if
- You need command enterprise.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want searchlight.
Choose Mullvad VPN if
- You need flat single pricing.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want account-number signup.
Questions people ask
- Is March Networks or Mullvad VPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. March Networks starts at On request and Mullvad VPN at $5/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, March Networks or Mullvad VPN?
- March Networks starts at On request and Mullvad VPN at $5/month.
- Does March Networks or Mullvad VPN run on more platforms?
- March Networks runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Mullvad VPN runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- What is March Networks best used for?
- March Networks is most often used for a bank investigating a disputed atm withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timeline, a credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and ip cameras must coexist on one recorder, a restaurant chain overlaying till exceptions on video across hundreds of locations, a transit operator needing video retrieval from vehicles and stations without shipping terabytes over the network. Of those, a bank investigating a disputed atm withdrawal who needs the clip for that transaction, not two hours of timeline and a credit union refreshing 200 branches in phases where analogue and ip cameras must coexist on one recorder are not what Mullvad VPN is typically brought in for.
- What can March Networks do that Mullvad VPN cannot?
- March Networks covers Command Enterprise, Searchlight, Hybrid recording, X-Series hybrid NVRs. Mullvad VPN covers Flat single pricing, Account-number signup, Cash and crypto payments, WireGuard support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
March Networks: Who owns March Networks?
Delta Electronics of Taiwan, which acquired it in December 2021 for 114 million US dollars. Before that it was owned by Chinese manufacturer Infinova, which by January 2020 had a PRC government entity as controlling shareholder.
March Networks: Is March Networks NDAA compliant?
The company states it is, citing American system-on-chip processors in the majority of its cameras and in its Command Recording Server bundles and X-Series hybrid NVRs. Verify per model, and expect the ownership history to be raised in a federal procurement review.
March Networks: What is Searchlight?
The layer that overlays ATM, teller and point of sale transaction data on video so investigators search by transaction rather than by time.
March Networks: Is video stored in the cloud?
No, it is hybrid. Video is recorded on a recorder at each site and only required clips move centrally, which is why it suits large branch estates on modest connections.
Related pages
More on March Networks
More on Mullvad VPN
Other head to heads
- March Networks vs Envysion
- March Networks vs Eagle Eye Networks
- March Networks vs Dahua Technology
- March Networks vs Genetec Security Center
- March Networks vs DTiQ
- March Networks vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- March Networks vs Salient CompleteView
- March Networks vs Hanwha Vision
- March Networks vs Milestone XProtect
- March Networks vs Camio
- March Networks vs Rhombus Systems
- March Networks vs ExpressVPN
- March Networks vs Fortinet FortiGate
- March Networks vs HID Global
- March Networks vs IBM QRadar
- March Networks vs Jamf Pro
- March Networks vs Keeper Password Manager
- March Networks vs Keygen
- March Networks vs IVPN
- March Networks vs Private Internet Access
- March Networks vs TunnelBear
- March Networks vs NordVPN
- March Networks vs Avast One
- March Networks vs ProtonVPN
- March Networks vs Enpass
- March Networks vs Surfshark
- March Networks vs Windscribe
- March Networks vs Securiti
- March Networks vs Delinea
- March Networks vs Doppler
- March Networks vs Feedzai
- March Networks vs Frontegg
- March Networks vs HashiCorp Boundary
- March Networks vs CyberGhost VPN
- Mullvad VPN vs Envysion
- Mullvad VPN vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Mullvad VPN vs Dahua Technology
- Mullvad VPN vs Genetec Security Center
- Mullvad VPN vs DTiQ
- Mullvad VPN vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Mullvad VPN vs Salient CompleteView
- Mullvad VPN vs Hanwha Vision
- Mullvad VPN vs Milestone XProtect
- Mullvad VPN vs Camio
- Mullvad VPN vs Rhombus Systems
- Mullvad VPN vs ExpressVPN
- Mullvad VPN vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Mullvad VPN vs HID Global
- Mullvad VPN vs IBM QRadar
- Mullvad VPN vs Jamf Pro
- Mullvad VPN vs Keeper Password Manager
- Mullvad VPN vs Keygen
- Mullvad VPN vs IVPN
- Mullvad VPN vs Private Internet Access
- Mullvad VPN vs TunnelBear
- Mullvad VPN vs NordVPN
- Mullvad VPN vs Avast One
- Mullvad VPN vs ProtonVPN
- Mullvad VPN vs Enpass
- Mullvad VPN vs Surfshark
- Mullvad VPN vs Windscribe
- Mullvad VPN vs Securiti
- Mullvad VPN vs Delinea
- Mullvad VPN vs Doppler
- Mullvad VPN vs Feedzai
- Mullvad VPN vs Frontegg
- Mullvad VPN vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Mullvad VPN vs CyberGhost VPN
