Operating Systems · head to head
Manjaro vs Visual Studio Code

Manjaro
Operating Systems
Arch-based Linux distribution with an installer and sane defaults
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Manjaro holding packages back from Arch can break AUR packages built against current Arch, which is its best-known complaint; Visual Studio Code requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- They diverge on capability: Manjaro covers Graphical installer, Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Manjaro and Visual Studio Code actually diverge.
| Attribute | Manjaro | Visual Studio Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Desktop | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces) |
| Category | Operating Systems | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Manjaro
- Graphical installer
- Delayed updates
- Hardware detection
- Multiple desktops
Only in Visual Studio Code
- IntelliSense
- Debugging
- Built-in Git
- Extensions
- Integrated terminal
- Syntax highlighting
- Code refactoring
- Snippets
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Manjaro
- Wanting Arch and the AUR without the manual installnot Visual Studio Code
- Desktops needing current package versions with some stability buffernot Visual Studio Code
- Hardware that benefits from automatic proprietary driver handlingnot Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
- Code editingnot Manjaro
- Web developmentnot Manjaro
- Debuggingnot Manjaro
- Version controlnot Manjaro
- Remote developmentnot Manjaro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Manjaro
- Holding packages back from Arch can break AUR packages built against current Arch, which is its best-known complaint
- Still a rolling release, so updates can require intervention and are not fit-and-forget
- The project has had public incidents around expired certificates and governance that dented confidence
- Not as current as Arch nor as stable as a fixed-release distribution, which is the cost of sitting between them
Visual Studio Code
- Requires extension installation for language-specific features and tooling
- Performance can degrade with very large codebases (100,000+ files)
- Git integration is basic; requires extensions for advanced version control workflows
Pricing, plan by plan
Manjaro
Free- ManjaroFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Visual Studio Code
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Visual Studio Code review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Manjaro if
- You need graphical installer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Desktop.
- You also want delayed updates.
Choose Visual Studio Code if
- You need intellisense.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- You also want debugging.
Questions people ask
- Is Manjaro or Visual Studio Code better?
- Neither clearly leads. Manjaro starts at Free and Visual Studio Code at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Manjaro or Visual Studio Code?
- Manjaro starts at Free and Visual Studio Code at Free.
- Does Manjaro or Visual Studio Code run on more platforms?
- Manjaro runs on Linux, Desktop. Visual Studio Code runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web (via GitHub Codespaces).
- Can I use Manjaro for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Manjaro best used for?
- Manjaro is most often used for wanting arch and the aur without the manual install, desktops needing current package versions with some stability buffer, hardware that benefits from automatic proprietary driver handling. Of those, wanting arch and the aur without the manual install and desktops needing current package versions with some stability buffer are not what Visual Studio Code is typically brought in for.
- What can Manjaro do that Visual Studio Code cannot?
- Manjaro covers Graphical installer, Delayed updates, Hardware detection, Multiple desktops. Visual Studio Code covers IntelliSense, Debugging, Built-in Git, Extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Manjaro: Is Manjaro free?
Yes, entirely free and open source.
Visual Studio Code: Is Visual Studio Code free?
Yes. Visual Studio Code is completely free to use under the MIT license. There are no subscription fees or paid tiers.
SourceManjaro: Is Manjaro the same as Arch?
It is based on Arch and uses pacman and the AUR, but holds packages back for testing and ships a graphical installer, so it is not identical.
Visual Studio Code: Can I use VS Code for remote development?
Yes. The Remote Development extension pack allows development on remote machines via SSH, in containers, or in Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) while using the full VS Code feature set.
SourceManjaro: Why can AUR packages break on Manjaro?
AUR packages are built against current Arch. Manjaro delays packages, so an AUR build can expect a library version Manjaro has not shipped yet.
Visual Studio Code: How many extensions are available?
The VS Code Marketplace contains thousands of extensions from Microsoft and the community for language support, debuggers, themes, formatters, and productivity tools.
SourceVisual Studio Code: Does VS Code support debugging?
Yes. VS Code includes built-in debugging for JavaScript, TypeScript, and Node.js, and supports debugging for Python, C++, C#, Java, Ruby, Go, PHP, and other languages via extensions.
SourceVisual Studio Code: What operating systems does VS Code support?
VS Code runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with identical features and keybindings across all platforms.
SourceRelated pages
More on Visual Studio Code
Other head to heads
- Manjaro vs Arch Linux
- Manjaro vs Linux Mint
- Manjaro vs openSUSE
- Manjaro vs Pop!_OS
- Manjaro vs Ubuntu
- Manjaro vs Debian
- Manjaro vs Fedora
- Manjaro vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Manjaro vs FreeBSD
- Manjaro vs Alpine Linux
- Manjaro vs AlmaLinux
- Manjaro vs NixOS
- Manjaro vs Qubes OS
- Manjaro vs Rocky Linux
- Manjaro vs Ansible
- Manjaro vs GoLand
- Manjaro vs Fig
- Manjaro vs Turborepo
- Manjaro vs Harness
- Manjaro vs Buildkite
- Manjaro vs Argo CD
- Manjaro vs GitLab CI/CD
- Manjaro vs HCP Terraform
- Manjaro vs Helm
- Manjaro vs GNU Emacs
- Manjaro vs Keil MDK
- Manjaro vs Vite
- Manjaro vs Bazel
- Manjaro vs Daytona
- Manjaro vs Depot
- Manjaro vs PhpStorm
- Manjaro vs RubyMine
- Visual Studio Code vs Arch Linux
- Visual Studio Code vs Linux Mint
- Visual Studio Code vs openSUSE
- Visual Studio Code vs Pop!_OS
- Visual Studio Code vs Ubuntu
- Visual Studio Code vs Debian
- Visual Studio Code vs Fedora
- Visual Studio Code vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Visual Studio Code vs FreeBSD
- Visual Studio Code vs Alpine Linux
- Visual Studio Code vs AlmaLinux
- Visual Studio Code vs NixOS
- Visual Studio Code vs Qubes OS
- Visual Studio Code vs Rocky Linux
- Visual Studio Code vs Ansible
- Visual Studio Code vs GoLand
- Visual Studio Code vs Fig
- Visual Studio Code vs Turborepo
- Visual Studio Code vs Harness
- Visual Studio Code vs Buildkite
- Visual Studio Code vs Argo CD
- Visual Studio Code vs GitLab CI/CD
- Visual Studio Code vs HCP Terraform
- Visual Studio Code vs Helm
- Visual Studio Code vs GNU Emacs
- Visual Studio Code vs Keil MDK
- Visual Studio Code vs Vite
- Visual Studio Code vs Bazel
- Visual Studio Code vs Daytona
- Visual Studio Code vs Depot
- Visual Studio Code vs PhpStorm
- Visual Studio Code vs RubyMine

