Softwr

Software · head to head

Lloyd's List Intelligence vs Sea Machines

Lloyd's List Intelligence logo

Lloyd's List Intelligence

Software

Maritime data and analytics

From
$1000/month
Rated
-
Sea Machines logo

Sea Machines

Software

Autonomous vessel control systems

From
$50000/one-time
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Lloyd's List Intelligence enterprise-only pricing with no public rate card available; Sea Machines requires hardware fitted to the vessel; the autonomy systems are retrofits or new build installations rather than a software purchase
  • They diverge on capability: Lloyd's List Intelligence covers Vessel database, Sea Machines covers Autonomous control.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Lloyd's List Intelligence and Sea Machines actually diverge.

Attributes where Lloyd's List Intelligence and Sea Machines differ
AttributeLloyd's List IntelligenceSea Machines
Starting price$1000/month$50000/one-time
Pricing modelsubscriptionone-time
PlatformsWeb, APIEmbedded, Web, Mobile
Founded17342015

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Lloyd's List Intelligence

  • Vessel database
  • Port intelligence
  • Ownership tracking
  • Market analysis
  • API
  • Data feeds
  • Analytics platforms
  • Api support

Only in Sea Machines

  • Autonomous control
  • Remote operation
  • Collision avoidance
  • Pattern following
  • Vessel systems
  • Communication networks
  • Shore-based control
  • Embedded support

Both cover

  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Lloyd's List Intelligence

  • Trade finance compliance and risk assessmentnot Sea Machines
  • Counterparty and vessel due diligencenot Sea Machines
  • Voyage and shipping risk managementnot Sea Machines
  • Sanctions screening and trade-based money-laundering detectionnot Sea Machines
  • Commodity market intelligencenot Sea Machines

Sea Machines

  • Intelligent voyage and transit autonomy for workboatsnot Lloyd's List Intelligence
  • Pattern autonomy for survey and repetitive route worknot Lloyd's List Intelligence
  • Collision avoidance using the AI-ris computer vision sensornot Lloyd's List Intelligence
  • Remote command and control of vessels, including in GPS denied environmentsnot Lloyd's List Intelligence
  • Fleet management and telemetry through Fleetviewer and the SMLINK APIsnot Lloyd's List Intelligence

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Lloyd's List Intelligence

  • Enterprise-only pricing with no public rate card available
  • Requires subscription and contract with minimal transparency on costs
  • Limited public documentation on specific data retention policies

Sea Machines

  • Requires hardware fitted to the vessel; the autonomy systems are retrofits or new build installations rather than a software purchase
  • Targeted at vessels from 10 to 300 ft, so it does not address the largest commercial tonnage
  • Pricing is not published and is arranged directly with the vendor
  • The SM300-NG is the class-approved unit, so the cheaper SM300-SP does not carry the same approval

Pricing, plan by plan

Lloyd's List Intelligence

$1000/month
  • Professional$2500/month
    • Vessel database
    • Port intelligence
    • Ownership data

Sea Machines

$50000/one-time
  • SM300$75000/one-time
    • Autonomous control
    • Collision avoidance
    • Remote operation

Which should you pick?

Choose Lloyd's List Intelligence if

  • You need vessel database.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want port intelligence.

Choose Sea Machines if

  • You need autonomous control.
  • You work on Embedded, Web, Mobile.
  • You also want remote operation.

Questions people ask

Is Lloyd's List Intelligence or Sea Machines better?
Neither clearly leads. Lloyd's List Intelligence starts at $1000/month and Sea Machines at $50000/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Lloyd's List Intelligence or Sea Machines?
Lloyd's List Intelligence starts at $1000/month and Sea Machines at $50000/one-time.
Does Lloyd's List Intelligence or Sea Machines run on more platforms?
Lloyd's List Intelligence runs on Web, API. Sea Machines runs on Embedded, Web, Mobile.
What is Lloyd's List Intelligence best used for?
Lloyd's List Intelligence is most often used for trade finance compliance and risk assessment, counterparty and vessel due diligence, voyage and shipping risk management, sanctions screening and trade-based money-laundering detection. Of those, trade finance compliance and risk assessment and counterparty and vessel due diligence are not what Sea Machines is typically brought in for.
What can Lloyd's List Intelligence do that Sea Machines cannot?
Lloyd's List Intelligence covers Vessel database, Port intelligence, Ownership tracking, Market analysis. Sea Machines covers Autonomous control, Remote operation, Collision avoidance, Pattern following. Both handle Web support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Lloyd's List Intelligence: What real-time data does Lloyd's List Intelligence provide?

Lloyd's List Intelligence provides 100% fleet coverage with 200M+ daily vessel positions from real-time AIS data, Automatic Identification System (AIS) tracking, and vessel movement records across commercial fleets.

Source
Lloyd's List Intelligence: How accurate are Lloyd's List Intelligence predictions?

The platform's AI models predict destination with 70% accuracy, ETA to port within plus or minus 10 hours, and ETB within one to two hours for all commercial vessel types.

Source
Lloyd's List Intelligence: What AIS data sources does Lloyd's List Intelligence use?

Lloyd's List Intelligence combines terrestrial, shipborne, and satellite AIS data through their proprietary AIS SeaOrbis platform, launched in April 2025, validated by over 80 analysts.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads