Cybersecurity · head to head
Legit Security vs Restate

Legit Security
Cybersecurity
AI-native ASPM platform securing AI-generated code before deployment
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Restate
Developer Tools
Durable execution engine in Rust with a free tier and low-latency workflows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Restate has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Legit Security pricing requires contacting sales, making cost comparison difficult; Restate the runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- They diverge on capability: Legit Security covers VibeGuard AI code scanning, Restate covers Durable execution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Legit Security and Restate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Legit Security | Restate |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Contact sales for custom pricing | Per month by durable action count |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, IDE, CI/CD | Linux, macOS, Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Legit Security
- VibeGuard AI code scanning
- Unified vulnerability remediation
- Code Security (SAST/SCA)
- Secrets detection and prevention
- Software Supply Chain Security
- Code change detection
- AI-powered remediation
- Risk scoring
Only in Restate
- Durable execution
- Virtual objects
- Single binary runtime
- Multi-language SDKs
- Workflows and sagas
- Restate Cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Legit Security
- Securing AI-generated code from GitHub Copilot and IDE assistantsnot Restate
- Consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple AppSec toolsnot Restate
- Preventing credential leaks across development workspacesnot Restate
- Automating remediation workflows with AI-powered suggestionsnot Restate
- Compliance automation with SBOM generation and enforcementnot Restate
Restate
- Payment or order flows where a crash between two external API calls must not double-charge or lose the ordernot Legit Security
- AI agent loops that call tools over minutes or hours and must survive a deployment mid-runnot Legit Security
- Replacing hand-rolled retry, idempotency key and outbox code across a set of microservicesnot Legit Security
- A small team that wants durable workflows without operating a Temporal cluster and its databasenot Legit Security
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Legit Security
- Pricing requires contacting sales, making cost comparison difficult
- No published pricing tiers or free tier available
- Requires integration with existing SAST and SCA tools for full capability
- Focused primarily on code security within development lifecycle
- Newer entrant with less market presence than established competitors
Restate
- The runtime is under a Business Source Licence rather than an open source licence, so building a competing managed offering on it is prohibited and some procurement functions will reject it on licence grounds alone.
- Restate Cloud jumps from a free fifty thousand actions straight to 300 US dollars a month for twenty million, so a workload sitting at a few hundred thousand actions pays enterprise-shaped money for hobby-shaped volume.
- It is a young project against Temporal’s established base, so hiring engineers who already know it is unrealistic and the answer to most questions is in the docs rather than on Stack Overflow.
- The programming model requires structuring code around durable handlers and virtual objects, which is a genuine rewrite for existing services rather than a library you add.
- The single-binary simplicity that makes small deployments cheap also means fewer operational knobs at very large scale than a system designed as separable components.
Pricing, plan by plan
Legit Security
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Legit Security review.
Restate
Free- FreeFree
- Fifty thousand durable actions per month
- No credit card required
- Community support
- Starter$300/month
- Twenty million actions per month
- Two hundred actions per second, bursting to one thousand
- Twenty GB storage
- Pro$1000/month
- Fifty million actions per month
- Five hundred actions per second, bursting to two thousand
- Fifty GB storage
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume
- Twenty-four seven P0 support
- 99.99 per cent SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Legit Security if
- You need vibeguard ai code scanning.
- You work on Web, IDE, CI/CD.
- You also want unified vulnerability remediation.
Choose Restate if
- You need durable execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want virtual objects.
Questions people ask
- Is Legit Security or Restate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Legit Security starts at On request and Restate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Legit Security or Restate?
- Restate has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Legit Security and Free for Restate.
- Does Legit Security or Restate run on more platforms?
- Legit Security runs on Web, IDE, CI/CD. Restate runs on Linux, macOS, Web.
- Can I use Restate for free?
- Yes. Restate has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Legit Security starts at On request.
- What is Legit Security best used for?
- Legit Security is most often used for securing ai-generated code from github copilot and ide assistants, consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple appsec tools, preventing credential leaks across development workspaces, automating remediation workflows with ai-powered suggestions. Of those, securing ai-generated code from github copilot and ide assistants and consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple appsec tools are not what Restate is typically brought in for.
- What can Legit Security do that Restate cannot?
- Legit Security covers VibeGuard AI code scanning, Unified vulnerability remediation, Code Security (SAST/SCA), Secrets detection and prevention. Restate covers Durable execution, Virtual objects, Single binary runtime, Multi-language SDKs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Legit Security: What is VibeGuard and how does it work?
VibeGuard is Legit Security's core feature that scans AI-generated code directly within IDEs like GitHub Copilot and Cursor, identifying vulnerabilities before code leaves the developer's editor.
SourceRestate: Is Restate open source?
The SDKs are MIT. The runtime is under a Business Source Licence, which permits self-hosting but not offering it as a competing service.
Legit Security: What AI code assistants does Legit Security support?
Legit Security integrates with GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude to scan AI-generated code for vulnerabilities.
SourceRestate: How does it compare with Temporal?
Same problem, different shape: one Rust binary with embedded storage instead of a server plus database plus workers, and lower per-step latency.
Legit Security: How does Legit Security's AI remediation feature work?
The platform uses AI to suggest specific code fixes for identified vulnerabilities and can automatically create tickets in Jira with full context for developers to review and apply.
SourceRestate: Is there a free tier?
Yes, fifty thousand durable actions a month on Restate Cloud with no card required.
Legit Security: Does Legit Security support compliance reporting?
Yes, Legit Security automates compliance automation with SBOM generation and can generate compliance reports for security and regulatory requirements.
SourceRestate: Which languages are supported?
TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Go, Python and Rust.
Related pages
More on Legit Security
Other head to heads
- Legit Security vs Veracode
- Legit Security vs Snyk
- Legit Security vs Aikido
- Legit Security vs Delinea
- Legit Security vs Endor Labs
- Legit Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Legit Security vs Akeyless
- Legit Security vs Syft
- Legit Security vs IBM QRadar
- Legit Security vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Legit Security vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Legit Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Legit Security vs MetricStream
- Legit Security vs Mimecast
- Legit Security vs Motorola Vigilant
- Legit Security vs Nessus
- Legit Security vs Microsoft Defender
- Legit Security vs Helix
- Legit Security vs Rust
- Legit Security vs Atlantis
- Legit Security vs Jitsu
- Legit Security vs Okteto
- Legit Security vs Argo CD
- Legit Security vs Steampipe
- Legit Security vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Legit Security vs Deno
- Legit Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Legit Security vs Turborepo
- Legit Security vs Keycloak
- Legit Security vs Garden
- Legit Security vs GitLab CI/CD
- Legit Security vs HCP Terraform
- Legit Security vs Helm
- Legit Security vs Notepad++
- Restate vs Veracode
- Restate vs Snyk
- Restate vs Aikido
- Restate vs Delinea
- Restate vs Endor Labs
- Restate vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Restate vs Akeyless
- Restate vs Syft
- Restate vs IBM QRadar
- Restate vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Restate vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Restate vs HashiCorp Vault
- Restate vs MetricStream
- Restate vs Mimecast
- Restate vs Motorola Vigilant
- Restate vs Nessus
- Restate vs Microsoft Defender
- Restate vs Helix
- Restate vs Rust
- Restate vs Atlantis
- Restate vs Jitsu
- Restate vs Okteto
- Restate vs Argo CD
- Restate vs Steampipe
- Restate vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Restate vs Deno
- Restate vs Visual Studio Code
- Restate vs Turborepo
- Restate vs Keycloak
- Restate vs Garden
- Restate vs GitLab CI/CD
- Restate vs HCP Terraform
- Restate vs Helm
- Restate vs Notepad++
