Accounting · head to head
Lago vs RazorpayX

Lago
Accounting
Open-source billing infrastructure for usage-based models
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

RazorpayX
Accounting
Indian business banking layer for current accounts, automated payouts, vendor payments and payroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Lago has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Lago free tier limited to 10,000 entities per month with 5M event cap; RazorpayX everything is India specific, the rails, the currency, the statutory deductions and the filings, so a company that redomiciles or expands abroad gets no reuse and has to run a second banking and payroll stack in the new jurisdiction.
- They diverge on capability: Lago covers Real-time usage metering, RazorpayX covers Current account.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Lago and RazorpayX actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Lago
- Real-time usage metering
- Multiple pricing models
- Automated invoicing
- Prepaid credits
- Entitlements
- Multi-currency support
- Payment orchestration
- Revenue analytics
Only in RazorpayX
- Current account
- Payout API
- Bulk payouts
- Payout links
- Vendor payments
- Payroll
- Statutory filing support
- Corporate cards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Lago
- Building usage-based billing for high-volume APIs and infrastructurenot RazorpayX
- Implementing metered billing for AI and tokenized servicesnot RazorpayX
- Creating subscription and hybrid pricing modelsnot RazorpayX
- Managing multi-currency billing for global companiesnot RazorpayX
- Maintaining billing infrastructure without vendor lock-innot RazorpayX
RazorpayX
- An Indian marketplace settling thousands of seller payouts on a schedule that no bank portal can supportnot Lago
- A startup running payroll for a growing team that needs provident fund, employee state insurance and tax deduction handled without an in house specialistnot Lago
- A company paying many vendors monthly that needs tax deducted at source calculated and recorded against each paymentnot Lago
- A product team that needs disbursements to happen from application code with webhook confirmation rather than from a treasury spreadsheetnot Lago
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Lago
- Free tier limited to 10,000 entities per month with 5M event cap
- No specific pricing published for Pro annual plan or Scale plan
- Self-hosted and on-premise deployments require engineering resources
- Community support only on free tier
- Scale plan requires annual contracts and sales engagement
RazorpayX
- Everything is India specific, the rails, the currency, the statutory deductions and the filings, so a company that redomiciles or expands abroad gets no reuse and has to run a second banking and payroll stack in the new jurisdiction.
- The current account is held with a partner bank while the interface and the relationship belong to Razorpay, so an escalation about the account itself can fall between two organisations and the deposit protection you have depends on the bank, not on the fintech.
- Indian payment fintechs are subject to active central bank intervention, and Razorpay itself spent a period unable to onboard new merchants following a regulatory direction, so single provider concentration for both collections and payouts is a live continuity risk rather than a theoretical one.
- Payouts carry per transaction charges beyond an included allowance and payroll is charged per employee, so a high volume settlement business or a company hiring quickly finds the running cost scales directly with the activity that made the product attractive.
- Support is largely ticket based and account management is reserved for larger accounts, so a failed high value payout or a payroll run that does not credit becomes a queue rather than a call, which is a poor position to be in on a salary date.
Pricing, plan by plan
Lago
Free- Build (Free)Free
- 10,000 managed entities per month
- 5M usage events per month
- 1K events per second rate limit
- Pro$399/month
- 10,000 entities included (graduated pricing to 100K)
- 25M usage events included (to 500M with graduated rates)
- 10K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- Scale$null/custom
- Custom entity and event volumes
- 50K events per second (upgradeable to 100K)
- RBAC and SSO (SAML)
RazorpayX
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the RazorpayX review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Lago if
- You need real-time usage metering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted, On-premise, VPC.
- You also want multiple pricing models.
Questions people ask
- Is Lago or RazorpayX better?
- Neither clearly leads. Lago starts at Free and RazorpayX at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Lago or RazorpayX?
- Lago has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Lago and On request for RazorpayX.
- Does Lago or RazorpayX run on more platforms?
- Lago runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted, On-premise, VPC. RazorpayX runs on Web.
- Can I use Lago for free?
- Yes. Lago has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. RazorpayX starts at On request.
- What is Lago best used for?
- Lago is most often used for building usage-based billing for high-volume apis and infrastructure, implementing metered billing for ai and tokenized services, creating subscription and hybrid pricing models, managing multi-currency billing for global companies. Of those, building usage-based billing for high-volume apis and infrastructure and implementing metered billing for ai and tokenized services are not what RazorpayX is typically brought in for.
- What can Lago do that RazorpayX cannot?
- Lago covers Real-time usage metering, Multiple pricing models, Automated invoicing, Prepaid credits. RazorpayX covers Current account, Payout API, Bulk payouts, Payout links.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Lago: Can I use Lago open-source for free?
Yes, Lago is open-source under the AGPLv3 license and can be self-hosted. The cloud-based Build plan is also free with limits of 10,000 entities and 5M events per month.
SourceRazorpayX: Is RazorpayX a bank?
No. The current account is provided by partner banks. RazorpayX supplies the interface, the payout automation and the payroll and compliance layer on top of it.
Lago: What payment providers does Lago integrate with?
Lago integrates with Stripe and Adyen for payment processing. It is not a payment processor itself but orchestrates payments through these providers.
SourceRazorpayX: Can a company registered outside India use it?
No. It serves Indian registered entities, rupee accounts and Indian statutory requirements.
Lago: Does Lago support multiple currencies?
Yes, Lago supports multi-currency billing with automatic currency conversion for global businesses.
SourceRazorpayX: Does the payroll module handle statutory compliance?
It calculates and supports the main statutory items, provident fund, employee state insurance, professional tax and income tax deduction, and assists with the periodic filings. Confirm the scope against your state specific obligations, since professional tax in particular varies.
RazorpayX: What happens to my payouts if there is a regulatory action against Razorpay?
That has happened before in the form of a restriction on onboarding new merchants. Existing customers continued, but the episode is the reason many businesses keep a bank relationship and a second payout route alive alongside it.
RazorpayX: Does it connect to accounting software?
It integrates with the Indian accounting tools most of its customers use, so payouts and payroll postings do not have to be rekeyed. Check your specific product rather than assuming, because coverage is narrower than for global ledgers.
RazorpayX: How is it priced?
A plan fee with included payout volumes, per transaction charges beyond that, and a per employee charge for payroll. Model your actual payout count rather than the plan headline, because that is where the cost lands.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Lago vs Orb
- Lago vs Metronome
- Lago vs Stigg
- Lago vs Dodo Payments
- Lago vs Creem
- Lago vs Invoicera
- Lago vs Polar
- Lago vs Maxio
- Lago vs Zuora
- Lago vs Paddle
- Lago vs Invoicely
- Lago vs QuickBooks
- Lago vs Mercury
- Lago vs Mesh Payments
- Lago vs Money Forward Cloud
- Lago vs Moneybird
- Lago vs MYOB
- Lago vs Netvisor
- Lago vs Qonto
- Lago vs Microsoft Excel
- Lago vs Airwallex
- Lago vs Basware
- Lago vs Modern Treasury
- Lago vs DATEV
- Lago vs Kodo
- Lago vs Plaid
- Lago vs Adyen
- Lago vs Yooz
- Lago vs Circula
- Lago vs Invoice2go
- RazorpayX vs Orb
- RazorpayX vs Metronome
- RazorpayX vs Stigg
- RazorpayX vs Dodo Payments
- RazorpayX vs Creem
- RazorpayX vs Invoicera
- RazorpayX vs Polar
- RazorpayX vs Maxio
- RazorpayX vs Zuora
- RazorpayX vs Paddle
- RazorpayX vs Invoicely
- RazorpayX vs QuickBooks
- RazorpayX vs Mercury
- RazorpayX vs Mesh Payments
- RazorpayX vs Money Forward Cloud
- RazorpayX vs Moneybird
- RazorpayX vs MYOB
- RazorpayX vs Netvisor
- RazorpayX vs Qonto
- RazorpayX vs Microsoft Excel
- RazorpayX vs Airwallex
- RazorpayX vs Basware
- RazorpayX vs Modern Treasury
- RazorpayX vs DATEV
- RazorpayX vs Kodo
- RazorpayX vs Plaid
- RazorpayX vs Adyen
- RazorpayX vs Yooz
- RazorpayX vs Circula
- RazorpayX vs Invoice2go
