Design · head to head
Krita vs SolveSpace
SolveSpace
CAD
Open source parametric CAD with a constraint solver in a few megabytes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Krita not portable across Windows/macOS/Linux with consistent performance; SolveSpace the in-house geometry kernel fails on complex boolean operations and fillets, and the failure is sometimes silent bad geometry rather than an error message, so models must be checked before export or manufacture.
- They diverge on capability: Krita covers Digital painting, SolveSpace covers Constraint solver.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Krita and SolveSpace actually diverge.
| Attribute | Krita | SolveSpace |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Category | Design | CAD |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Krita
- Digital painting
- Brush engines
- Layer management
- Animation
- Vector tools
- OpenEXR
- PSD files
- Graphics tablets
Only in SolveSpace
- Constraint solver
- Solid modelling
- Assemblies
- Export formats
- Cross-platform
- Small footprint
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Krita
- Digital paintingnot SolveSpace
- Concept artnot SolveSpace
- Character designnot SolveSpace
- 2D animationnot SolveSpace
- Texture paintingnot SolveSpace
SolveSpace
- Designing 3D printed parts on a machine that cannot run mainstream CADnot Krita
- Teaching constraint-based parametric modelling without buying licences for a classroomnot Krita
- Checking that a mechanical linkage moves as intended before cutting metalnot Krita
- Producing dimensionally accurate STEP or STL output from a small open source toolchainnot Krita
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Krita
- Not portable across Windows/macOS/Linux with consistent performance
- Performance limits on large projects with many layers compared to professional software
- Requires system administrator privileges for installation on managed systems
- Limited professional support compared to commercial alternatives
SolveSpace
- The in-house geometry kernel fails on complex boolean operations and fillets, and the failure is sometimes silent bad geometry rather than an error message, so models must be checked before export or manufacture.
- There is no proper drawing and dimensioning workflow, so manufacturing documentation has to be produced in another application.
- Development is volunteer-led and intermittent; long gaps between releases are normal and there is no support contract available at any price.
- Assembly-level import of external CAD is very limited, so it does not fit a supply chain that exchanges native or assembly-level models with suppliers.
- The interface follows its own conventions rather than mainstream CAD ones, so existing SolidWorks or Fusion users spend time unlearning habits for a tool with a lower ceiling.
Pricing, plan by plan
Krita
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Krita review.
SolveSpace
Free- SolveSpaceFree
- Full application under the GPL
- No seat limit
- Windows, macOS and Linux builds
Which should you pick?
Choose Krita if
- You need digital painting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want brush engines.
Choose SolveSpace if
- You need constraint solver.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want solid modelling.
Questions people ask
- Is Krita or SolveSpace better?
- Neither clearly leads. Krita starts at Free and SolveSpace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Krita or SolveSpace?
- Krita starts at Free and SolveSpace at Free.
- Does Krita or SolveSpace run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, macOS, Linux, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Krita for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Krita best used for?
- Krita is most often used for digital painting, concept art, character design, 2d animation. Of those, digital painting and concept art are not what SolveSpace is typically brought in for.
- What can Krita do that SolveSpace cannot?
- Krita covers Digital painting, Brush engines, Layer management, Animation. SolveSpace covers Constraint solver, Solid modelling, Assemblies, Export formats.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Krita: Is Krita free and open source?
Yes, Krita is completely free and open source software developed by the KDE community. It is distributed under the LGPL license with no licensing fees.
SourceSolveSpace: Is it really free for commercial work?
Yes. It is released under the GPL with no licence fee and no seat limit. Support is community only.
Krita: What platforms does Krita support?
Krita is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can be downloaded from krita.org or installed via package managers on Linux distributions.
SourceSolveSpace: Can it replace Fusion 360 or SolidWorks?
No. It handles parts and simple assemblies well. Complex geometry, drawings and supply chain interoperability are outside its range.
Krita: What animation capabilities does Krita have?
Krita supports frame-by-frame animation with onion skin view, timeline management, and export to video formats for creating animated sequences.
SourceSolveSpace: What hardware does it need?
Very little. It runs on old laptops and small Linux machines where mainstream CAD will not start.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Krita vs Procreate
- Krita vs Adobe Illustrator
- Krita vs ArtRage
- Krita vs Rebelle
- Krita vs Procreate Dreams
- Krita vs Corel Painter
- Krita vs PaintTool SAI
- Krita vs Inkscape
- Krita vs Linearity Curve
- Krita vs LottieFiles
- Krita vs Framer
- Krita vs Principle
- Krita vs Lunacy
- Krita vs Magnific
- Krita vs Marvel
- Krita vs Origami Studio
- Krita vs Proto.io
- Krita vs FreeCAD
- Krita vs OnShape
- Krita vs Creo
- Krita vs Alibre Design
- Krita vs Bambu Studio
- Krita vs IronCAD
- Krita vs OpenSCAD
- Krita vs Zoo
- Krita vs Bentley MicroStation
- Krita vs CloudCompare
- Krita vs KiCad
- Krita vs PrusaSlicer
- Krita vs Mudbox
- Krita vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Krita vs Carlson Software
- Krita vs Corona Renderer
- Krita vs D5 Render
- Krita vs CATIA
- SolveSpace vs Procreate
- SolveSpace vs Adobe Illustrator
- SolveSpace vs ArtRage
- SolveSpace vs Rebelle
- SolveSpace vs Procreate Dreams
- SolveSpace vs Corel Painter
- SolveSpace vs PaintTool SAI
- SolveSpace vs Inkscape
- SolveSpace vs Linearity Curve
- SolveSpace vs LottieFiles
- SolveSpace vs Framer
- SolveSpace vs Principle
- SolveSpace vs Lunacy
- SolveSpace vs Magnific
- SolveSpace vs Marvel
- SolveSpace vs Origami Studio
- SolveSpace vs Proto.io
- SolveSpace vs FreeCAD
- SolveSpace vs OnShape
- SolveSpace vs Creo
- SolveSpace vs Alibre Design
- SolveSpace vs Bambu Studio
- SolveSpace vs IronCAD
- SolveSpace vs OpenSCAD
- SolveSpace vs Zoo
- SolveSpace vs Bentley MicroStation
- SolveSpace vs CloudCompare
- SolveSpace vs KiCad
- SolveSpace vs PrusaSlicer
- SolveSpace vs Mudbox
- SolveSpace vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- SolveSpace vs Carlson Software
- SolveSpace vs Corona Renderer
- SolveSpace vs D5 Render
- SolveSpace vs CATIA

