Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Octopus Deploy

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Octopus Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | Octopus Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Octopus Deploy
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Octopus Deploy
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Octopus Deploy
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Octopus Deploy
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Keycloak
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Keycloak
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Keycloak
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Octopus Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Octopus Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Octopus Deploy?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Octopus Deploy at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Octopus Deploy run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Octopus Deploy runs on Web.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Octopus Deploy is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceOctopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceOctopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceOctopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceOctopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceRelated pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Harness
- Keycloak vs HCP Terraform
- Keycloak vs Earthly
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Argo CD
- Keycloak vs Garden
- Keycloak vs GitLab CI/CD
- Keycloak vs Namespace
- Keycloak vs Nix
- Keycloak vs Nixpacks
- Keycloak vs Okteto
- Keycloak vs OpsLevel
- Keycloak vs PartyKit
- Octopus Deploy vs Penpot
- Octopus Deploy vs Atlantis
- Octopus Deploy vs Soketi
- Octopus Deploy vs Vite
- Octopus Deploy vs Depot
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Buildkite
- Octopus Deploy vs Coder
- Octopus Deploy vs Bitbucket
- Octopus Deploy vs Sweep
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs CodeSandbox
- Octopus Deploy vs Azure DevOps
- Octopus Deploy vs Backstage
- Octopus Deploy vs Claude Code
- Octopus Deploy vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Octopus Deploy vs Cody
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs Nix
- Octopus Deploy vs Nixpacks
- Octopus Deploy vs Okteto
- Octopus Deploy vs OpsLevel
- Octopus Deploy vs PartyKit
