Cybersecurity · head to head
Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Defender

Jamf Pro
Cybersecurity
Apple-only device management for Mac, iPhone, iPad and Apple TV, licensed per device by a public US vendor.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Microsoft Defender
Cybersecurity
Always-on protection for you and your family's data and devices
- From
- $12/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jamf Pro it manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.; Microsoft Defender defender Suite requires existing Microsoft 365 E3 or equivalent base licensing
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jamf Pro and Microsoft Defender actually diverge.
| Attribute | Jamf Pro | Microsoft Defender |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $12/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jamf Pro
- Automated Device Enrolment
- Configuration profiles
- Policies and scripts
- Smart groups
- Self Service
- Patch management
- Extension attributes
- Same-day OS support
Only in Microsoft Defender
Nothing recorded that Jamf Pro does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jamf Pro
- An Apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no IT touchnot Microsoft Defender
- Education deployments managing shared iPads across classes with per-user app assignmentnot Microsoft Defender
- Developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own Macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdownnot Microsoft Defender
- Organisations needing compliance evidence for Apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depthnot Microsoft Defender
Microsoft Defender
- Endpoint security and threat protectionnot Jamf Pro
- Identity and access securitynot Jamf Pro
- Email threat protectionnot Jamf Pro
- SaaS application security monitoringnot Jamf Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jamf Pro
- It manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.
- Licensing is per device per year with different rates for computers and mobile devices, so spare and shared hardware sitting in a cupboard continues to consume licences until somebody actively removes it from inventory, which is nobody's job by default.
- Apple's frameworks set the ceiling: if Apple does not expose a setting through MDM or declarative device management, Jamf cannot manage it either, so requests that are a single Group Policy object on Windows are answered with a scripted workaround or with nothing.
- Zero-touch deployment depends on devices being registered in Apple Business Manager, which generally means buying through Apple or an authorised reseller, so machines bought retail or inherited through an acquisition cannot be supervised without wiping and re-enrolling them.
- Getting value from it requires an Apple platform specialist who can write shell scripts, read configuration profiles and design smart group logic, and a generalist team without that skill uses a fraction of the product while paying the full per-device rate.
Microsoft Defender
- Defender Suite requires existing Microsoft 365 E3 or equivalent base licensing
- Some Defender products use pay-as-you-go pricing with variable costs
- Prices vary based on Microsoft agreements, requiring sales contact for custom quotes
Pricing, plan by plan
Jamf Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Jamf Pro review.
Microsoft Defender
$12/month- Microsoft Defender Suite$12/month
- Endpoint protection
- Identity threat detection
- Email security
- Microsoft 365 E5 with Defender$60/month
- Includes Defender Suite
- Microsoft Teams included
- Comprehensive security and compliance
- Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Add-on$2/month
- Vulnerability scanning and management
- One-month free trial available
- Annual commitment required
Which should you pick?
Choose Jamf Pro if
- You need automated device enrolment.
- You also want configuration profiles.
Choose Microsoft Defender if
Nothing in the data separates Microsoft Defender from Jamf Pro on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Jamf Pro or Microsoft Defender better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jamf Pro starts at On request and Microsoft Defender at $12/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jamf Pro or Microsoft Defender?
- Jamf Pro starts at On request and Microsoft Defender at $12/month.
- Does Jamf Pro or Microsoft Defender run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Jamf Pro best used for?
- Jamf Pro is most often used for an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch, education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment, developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdown, organisations needing compliance evidence for apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depth. Of those, an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch and education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment are not what Microsoft Defender is typically brought in for.
- What can Jamf Pro do that Microsoft Defender cannot?
- Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Configuration profiles, Policies and scripts, Smart groups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jamf Pro: Does Jamf Pro include endpoint security?
No. Threat prevention, endpoint telemetry and compliance monitoring are Jamf Protect, a separate product and a separate licence. Jamf Connect for identity and password sync is also separate.
Microsoft Defender: How much does Microsoft Defender Suite cost?
Microsoft Defender Suite costs $12/user/month (paid yearly), but requires existing Microsoft 365 E3 or equivalent base licensing. It includes endpoint protection, identity threat detection, email security, and SaaS application monitoring.
SourceJamf Pro: Can it manage Windows or Android?
No. Jamf manages Apple platforms only. A mixed estate needs a second management platform, and that is a deliberate product decision rather than a gap they intend to close.
Microsoft Defender: What add-ons are available for Microsoft Defender?
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Add-on costs $2/user/month with annual commitment and includes a one-month free trial. Additional pay-as-you-go products include External Attack Surface Management, Cloud Security Posture Management, and Sentinel.
SourceJamf Pro: Do I need Apple Business Manager?
For zero-touch enrolment and volume app licensing, yes. You can enrol devices manually through a user-initiated flow without it, but you lose supervision, automatic enrolment and the ability to prevent a user removing management.
Microsoft Defender: Is Defender included in Microsoft 365 E5?
Yes, Microsoft Defender Suite is included in Microsoft 365 E5 at $60/user/month (paid yearly with Teams). Prices may vary based on Microsoft agreements, requiring contact with Sales for customized quotes.
SourceJamf Pro: Can I host it myself?
Yes, Jamf Pro can be self-hosted, though Jamf Cloud is the default and receives new capabilities first. Self-hosting means you own the upgrade cadence, which matters because Apple's September releases set the timetable.
Jamf Pro: How does it compare to Microsoft Intune?
Intune manages Apple devices adequately and is often already paid for in an existing Microsoft agreement, which is the argument against Jamf. Jamf is deeper, supports new Apple releases faster, and has the local agent for scripting. Organisations with a few hundred Macs and a strong Apple culture generally choose Jamf; those with a handful of Macs in a Windows estate generally do not.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Defender
Other head to heads
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Jamf Pro vs 1Password
- Jamf Pro vs Norton 360
- Jamf Pro vs LastPass
- Jamf Pro vs Milestone XProtect
- Jamf Pro vs WireGuard
- Jamf Pro vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Jamf Pro vs Fenergo
- Jamf Pro vs Saviynt
- Jamf Pro vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Jamf Pro vs IBM QRadar
- Jamf Pro vs Authelia
- Jamf Pro vs Authy
- Jamf Pro vs Baffle
- Jamf Pro vs Beyond Identity
- Jamf Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender VPN
- Jamf Pro vs McAfee Total Protection
- Jamf Pro vs Proofpoint
- Jamf Pro vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Jamf Pro vs Avast One
- Jamf Pro vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Jamf Pro vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Jamf Pro vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Jamf Pro vs VMware Carbon Black
- Jamf Pro vs Wireshark
- Jamf Pro vs WorkOS
- Jamf Pro vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Jamf Pro vs Osano
- Microsoft Defender vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Microsoft Defender vs 1Password
- Microsoft Defender vs Norton 360
- Microsoft Defender vs LastPass
- Microsoft Defender vs Milestone XProtect
- Microsoft Defender vs WireGuard
- Microsoft Defender vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Microsoft Defender vs Fenergo
- Microsoft Defender vs Saviynt
- Microsoft Defender vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Microsoft Defender vs IBM QRadar
- Microsoft Defender vs Authelia
- Microsoft Defender vs Authy
- Microsoft Defender vs Baffle
- Microsoft Defender vs Beyond Identity
- Microsoft Defender vs BeyondTrust
- Microsoft Defender vs Bitdefender VPN
- Microsoft Defender vs McAfee Total Protection
- Microsoft Defender vs Proofpoint
- Microsoft Defender vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Microsoft Defender vs Avast One
- Microsoft Defender vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Microsoft Defender vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Microsoft Defender vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Microsoft Defender vs VMware Carbon Black
- Microsoft Defender vs Wireshark
- Microsoft Defender vs WorkOS
- Microsoft Defender vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Microsoft Defender vs Osano
