Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Keeper

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Keeper
Browser Extensions
Protect your passwords and private information
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Keeper has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Keeper free tier is severely limited to 10 passwords on a single device; essentially a trial rather than a usable free version
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Keeper covers Password management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Keeper actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Keeper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Brave, Opera, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Browser Extensions |
| Founded | 1911 | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Keeper
- Password management
- Zero-knowledge encryption
- Secure file storage
- BreachWatch
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
- Safari support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Keeper
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Keeper
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Keeper
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Keeper
Keeper
- Business and enterprise password management with zero-knowledge encryptionnot IBM QRadar
- Privileged access management for admin and service accountsnot IBM QRadar
- Secure remote access and privileged session recordingnot IBM QRadar
- Application secrets management through Secrets Managernot IBM QRadar
- Government deployments requiring FedRAMP Highnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Keeper
- Free tier is severely limited to 10 passwords on a single device; essentially a trial rather than a usable free version
- Personal plan at $1.79/month is promotional pricing; regular price is higher, making budget comparison difficult
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Keeper
Free- FreeFree
- 10 passwords max
- Single device only
- No sync
- Personal$1.79/month
- Unlimited passwords
- All devices
- 2FA support
- Family$3.83/month
- Up to 5 users
- Unlimited storage
- Shared vaults
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Keeper if
- You need password management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Brave, Opera, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want zero-knowledge encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Keeper better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Keeper at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Keeper?
- Keeper has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for IBM QRadar and Free for Keeper.
- Does IBM QRadar or Keeper run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Keeper runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Brave, Opera, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Keeper for free?
- Yes. Keeper has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM QRadar starts at On request.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Keeper is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Keeper cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Keeper covers Password management, Zero-knowledge encryption, Secure file storage, BreachWatch.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Keeper: Is there a free version of Keeper?
Keeper offers a free version with very limited functionality: it stores only 10 passwords on a single mobile device with no cross-device sync. A 30-day free trial provides full access to all features.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Keeper: What are Keeper's paid pricing plans?
Keeper Personal starts at $1.79/month (promotional pricing) with annual billing. Keeper Family covers up to 5 users at $3.83/month annually. Both include unlimited password storage, cross-device sync, and 2FA support.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Keeper: What browsers and devices does Keeper support?
Keeper has browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Brave, and Opera. It also offers native apps for iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, and web access.
SourceIBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
Keeper: Does Keeper support 2FA and passkeys?
Yes, Keeper stores and autofills FIDO2 passkeys and supports multiple 2FA methods including TOTP, SMS, and WebAuthn. Biometric login (fingerprint/face recognition) is also supported.
SourceIBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Keeper: How secure is Keeper?
Keeper uses zero-knowledge architecture where data is encrypted and decrypted only on your device. Only you can access your vault, and the company cannot see your passwords or data.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Evernote Web Clipper
- IBM QRadar vs Raindrop.io
- IBM QRadar vs AdBlock Plus
- IBM QRadar vs Ghostery
- IBM QRadar vs Momentum
- IBM QRadar vs Hemingway Editor
- IBM QRadar vs Tampermonkey
- IBM QRadar vs Stylus
- IBM QRadar vs Violentmonkey
- IBM QRadar vs Pocket
- IBM QRadar vs Dark Reader
- IBM QRadar vs Privacy Badger
- IBM QRadar vs Wappalyzer
- IBM QRadar vs WhatFont
- IBM QRadar vs Honey
- IBM QRadar vs LanguageTool
- IBM QRadar vs Mercury Reader
- Keeper vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keeper vs 1Password
- Keeper vs Norton 360
- Keeper vs LastPass
- Keeper vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Keeper vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Keeper vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Keeper vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Keeper vs Recorded Future
- Keeper vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Keeper vs Proofpoint
- Keeper vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Keeper vs Arnica
- Keeper vs Authelia
- Keeper vs Authy
- Keeper vs Baffle
- Keeper vs Beyond Identity
- Keeper vs BeyondTrust
- Keeper vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Keeper vs Raindrop.io
- Keeper vs AdBlock Plus
- Keeper vs Ghostery
- Keeper vs Momentum
- Keeper vs Hemingway Editor
- Keeper vs Tampermonkey
- Keeper vs Stylus
- Keeper vs Violentmonkey
- Keeper vs Pocket
- Keeper vs Dark Reader
- Keeper vs Privacy Badger
- Keeper vs Wappalyzer
- Keeper vs WhatFont
- Keeper vs Honey
- Keeper vs LanguageTool
- Keeper vs Mercury Reader
