Machine Learning · head to head
Groq vs Sourcegraph Cody

Groq
Machine Learning
Fast inference provider using proprietary LPU hardware for low-latency serving
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Sourcegraph Cody
AI
Enterprise AI coding assistant with whole-codebase context
- From
- $59/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Groq pricing is not published and is sold entirely by quote, making cost comparison difficult; Sourcegraph Cody no longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Groq and Sourcegraph Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Groq | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $59/month |
| Platforms | API, Cloud | web, windows, mac, linux |
| Category | Machine Learning | AI |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Groq
Nothing recorded that Sourcegraph Cody does not also cover.
Only in Sourcegraph Cody
- Multi-repository context
- Large context window
- Context filters
- Model flexibility
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Groq
- Latency-sensitive applications requiring sub-second inference response timesnot Sourcegraph Cody
- High-volume inference workloads where cost per inference matters at scalenot Sourcegraph Cody
- Custom model deployment with performance guaranteesnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Enterprise applications seeking inference-specific infrastructurenot Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody
- Cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgsnot Groq
- AI-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scalenot Groq
- Enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party LLMsnot Groq
- Codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developersnot Groq
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Groq
- Pricing is not published and is sold entirely by quote, making cost comparison difficult
- Limited to open-weight models; no proprietary model access through the platform
- Not widely integrated into third-party AI platforms compared to OpenAI or Anthropic
Sourcegraph Cody
- No longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Priced substantially higher than many competing AI coding assistants, with Enterprise plans typically requiring annual contracts
- Sourcegraph has shifted its individual-developer focus to a separate product, Amp, creating uncertainty about Cody's long-term product priority
- Requires integration with Sourcegraph's broader code intelligence platform rather than working as a lightweight standalone extension
Pricing, plan by plan
Groq
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Groq review.
Sourcegraph Cody
$59/month- Enterprise$59/month
- Whole-codebase AI context
- Context filters for sensitive code
- Multi-repository analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You need multi-repository context.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want large context window.
Questions people ask
- Is Groq or Sourcegraph Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Groq starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Groq or Sourcegraph Cody?
- Groq starts at On request and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month.
- Does Groq or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?
- Groq runs on API, Cloud. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.
- What is Groq best used for?
- Groq is most often used for latency-sensitive applications requiring sub-second inference response times, high-volume inference workloads where cost per inference matters at scale, custom model deployment with performance guarantees, enterprise applications seeking inference-specific infrastructure. Of those, latency-sensitive applications requiring sub-second inference response times and high-volume inference workloads where cost per inference matters at scale are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Groq do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?
- Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Groq: Is Groq free or paid?
Pricing details are not published on the main website. To explore Groq's service and pricing, visit their console at console.groq.com/home.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is Sourcegraph Cody still available to individual developers?
No, as of mid-2025 Cody Free and Pro plans were discontinued; Cody is now sold only as part of Sourcegraph's Enterprise plan, which requires an annual contract.
SourceGroq: Does Groq offer a free tier or free credits?
Free tier availability is not documented on the public site. Check the Groq console for current free tier or trial options.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How much does Sourcegraph Enterprise cost?
Enterprise plans start around $16,000 and scale with team size and seat count, including bundled AI credits; exact pricing requires a sales quote.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How does the AI credit system work on Enterprise plans?
Each plan includes a pooled allocation of AI credits shared across the organization; credits do not expire and roll over at renewal, with volume credit add-ons available.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: What happens if my organization exceeds its credit allocation?
Sourcegraph's pricing page addresses overage and offers additional volume credit buckets for teams that need more than their committed allocation.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is a free trial available for Sourcegraph Enterprise?
Sourcegraph's pricing page lists free trial availability as one of its published FAQ topics for prospective Enterprise customers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph Cody
Other head to heads
- Groq vs AWS SageMaker
- Groq vs Google Vertex AI
- Groq vs Azure Machine Learning
- Groq vs DataRobot
- Groq vs Mistral AI
- Groq vs OpenRouter
- Groq vs Ollama
- Groq vs Seldon
- Groq vs Keras
- Groq vs Fal AI
- Groq vs Snowflake
- Groq vs Dataiku
- Groq vs JMP
- Groq vs Minitab
- Groq vs Orange
- Groq vs Pachyderm
- Groq vs Tabnine
- Groq vs Amazon Q Developer
- Groq vs PromptLayer
- Groq vs AI21 Labs
- Groq vs Aider
- Groq vs Arize AI
- Groq vs Gumloop
- Groq vs Helicone
- Groq vs CoreWeave
- Groq vs Poolside
- Groq vs Cartesia
- Groq vs Jasper
- Groq vs ElevenLabs
- Groq vs Grok
- Groq vs Inflection AI
- Groq vs LatchBio
- Groq vs LOVO
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AWS SageMaker
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Google Vertex AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Azure Machine Learning
- Sourcegraph Cody vs DataRobot
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Mistral AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs OpenRouter
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Ollama
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Seldon
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Keras
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Fal AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Snowflake
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Dataiku
- Sourcegraph Cody vs JMP
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Minitab
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Orange
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Pachyderm
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Amazon Q Developer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs PromptLayer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AI21 Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Aider
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Arize AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Gumloop
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Helicone
- Sourcegraph Cody vs CoreWeave
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Poolside
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cartesia
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Jasper
- Sourcegraph Cody vs ElevenLabs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Grok
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Inflection AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LatchBio
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LOVO
