Browser Extensions · head to head
Greasemonkey vs Logseq

Greasemonkey
Browser Extensions
The original userscript manager, for Firefox
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Logseq
Content Creation
Free open-source note-taking with linked thoughts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Greasemonkey firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.; Logseq aGPL-3.0 licensing requires derivative works to be open-source
- They diverge on capability: Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution, Logseq covers Markdown-based notes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 17 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greasemonkey and Logseq actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greasemonkey | Logseq |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Firefox | macOS, Linux, Windows, iOS, Android, Web |
| Category | Browser Extensions | Content Creation |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greasemonkey
- Userscript execution
- Built-in script editor
- GM. API
- @resource support
- Script localisation
- Firefox for Android
Only in Logseq
- Markdown-based notes
- Bidirectional linking
- Graph visualization
- Backlinks
- Tags
- Daily notes
- Journaling
- Search and filtering
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greasemonkey
- Restyling or de-cluttering a site you use dailynot Logseq
- Automating a repetitive action on a web applicationnot Logseq
- Adding a missing feature to a site you do not controlnot Logseq
- Running userscripts on Firefox for Androidnot Logseq
- Writing and testing your own scripts in the browsernot Logseq
Logseq
- Privacy-first knowledge management with local data storagenot Greasemonkey
- Open-source alternative to proprietary note-taking platformsnot Greasemonkey
- Markdown and Org-mode file support with PDF annotationnot Greasemonkey
- Extensible through plugin ecosystem for custom workflowsnot Greasemonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greasemonkey
- Firefox only. There is no Chrome, Edge or Safari build and there never has been.
- Its API diverged from the Tampermonkey conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script from a sharing site may need adjusting to run.
- The dashboard is plainer than Tampermonkey's, with no diff view when a script updates itself.
- No cloud sync of the kind Tampermonkey and Violentmonkey offer; moving machines means exporting.
- A userscript manager can read and rewrite every page you visit, so the security of the arrangement depends entirely on the scripts you choose to install.
Logseq
- AGPL-3.0 licensing requires derivative works to be open-source
- Mobile apps (iOS and Android) still in alpha/beta development stage
- Self-hosted with local-first architecture, no built-in cloud sync option
- No native synchronisation between desktop and mobile versions without setup
Pricing, plan by plan
Greasemonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- Unlimited scripts
- Built-in editor
- No account required
Logseq
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Logseq review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Greasemonkey if
- You need userscript execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want built-in script editor.
Choose Logseq if
- You need markdown-based notes.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want bidirectional linking.
Questions people ask
- Is Greasemonkey or Logseq better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greasemonkey starts at Free and Logseq at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greasemonkey or Logseq?
- Greasemonkey starts at Free and Logseq at Free.
- Does Greasemonkey or Logseq run on more platforms?
- Greasemonkey runs on Firefox. Logseq runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Greasemonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Greasemonkey best used for?
- Greasemonkey is most often used for restyling or de-cluttering a site you use daily, automating a repetitive action on a web application, adding a missing feature to a site you do not control, running userscripts on firefox for android. Of those, restyling or de-cluttering a site you use daily and automating a repetitive action on a web application are not what Logseq is typically brought in for.
- What can Greasemonkey do that Logseq cannot?
- Greasemonkey covers Userscript execution, Built-in script editor, GM. API, @resource support. Logseq covers Markdown-based notes, Bidirectional linking, Graph visualization, Backlinks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Greasemonkey: Is Greasemonkey still maintained?
Yes. Version 4.14 was released on 2 June 2026, and the project has an active repository, bug tracker and discussion groups.
SourceLogseq: How much does Logseq cost?
Logseq is a free, open-source privacy-first knowledge base with no paid tiers or hidden costs. The software is available to download and use at no charge.
SourceGreasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey work on Chrome?
No. It is a Firefox extension and has never shipped for Chrome. Violentmonkey and Tampermonkey are the equivalents there.
SourceGreasemonkey: Will Tampermonkey scripts run in Greasemonkey?
Often, but not always. Greasemonkey's API diverged from the conventions most shared scripts are written against, so a script may need its header or its GM calls adjusted.
SourceGreasemonkey: Does Greasemonkey run on mobile?
On Firefox for Android, from version 4.12. There is no iOS build, because Firefox on iOS cannot load extensions of this kind.
SourceGreasemonkey: What is the GM API?
The set of functions a userscript manager exposes to scripts, named after Greasemonkey, which defined it. Greasemonkey supports the promise-based GM. form including GM.xmlHttpRequest and GM.registerMenuCommand.
SourceRelated pages
More on Greasemonkey
Other head to heads
- Greasemonkey vs FireMonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Violentmonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Tampermonkey
- Greasemonkey vs Userscripts
- Greasemonkey vs Stay
- Greasemonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Greasemonkey vs Keeper
- Greasemonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Greasemonkey vs Stylus
- Greasemonkey vs Pocket
- Greasemonkey vs Dark Reader
- Greasemonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Greasemonkey vs Rakuten
- Greasemonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Greasemonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Greasemonkey vs Night Eye
- Greasemonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Greasemonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- Greasemonkey vs Notion Web Clipper
- Greasemonkey vs Confluence
- Greasemonkey vs Notion AI
- Greasemonkey vs WordPress
- Greasemonkey vs OBS Studio
- Greasemonkey vs Mintlify
- Greasemonkey vs Kapwing
- Greasemonkey vs Bynder Content Workflow
- Greasemonkey vs GemPages
- Greasemonkey vs InVideo
- Greasemonkey vs BuzzSumo
- Greasemonkey vs Hashnode
- Greasemonkey vs Weebly
- Greasemonkey vs Trint
- Greasemonkey vs Kittl
- Greasemonkey vs Pictory
- Greasemonkey vs Podcastle
- Logseq vs FireMonkey
- Logseq vs Violentmonkey
- Logseq vs Tampermonkey
- Logseq vs Userscripts
- Logseq vs Stay
- Logseq vs Raindrop.io
- Logseq vs Keeper
- Logseq vs Mercury Reader
- Logseq vs Stylus
- Logseq vs Pocket
- Logseq vs Dark Reader
- Logseq vs Privacy Badger
- Logseq vs Rakuten
- Logseq vs uBlock Origin
- Logseq vs Hemingway Editor
- Logseq vs Night Eye
- Logseq vs React Developer Tools
- Logseq vs Save to Google Drive
- Logseq vs Notion Web Clipper
- Logseq vs Confluence
- Logseq vs Notion AI
- Logseq vs WordPress
- Logseq vs OBS Studio
- Logseq vs Mintlify
- Logseq vs Kapwing
- Logseq vs Bynder Content Workflow
- Logseq vs GemPages
- Logseq vs InVideo
- Logseq vs BuzzSumo
- Logseq vs Hashnode
- Logseq vs Weebly
- Logseq vs Trint
- Logseq vs Kittl
- Logseq vs Pictory
- Logseq vs Podcastle
