Maps · head to head
Google Maps vs Lonboard

Google Maps
Maps
Consumer navigation and local search app, distinct from the paid Google Maps Platform developer API
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Lonboard
Maps
Python map rendering in Jupyter that skips GeoJSON and moves millions of features without choking
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Google Maps location history (Timeline) is stored to the Google account unless disabled, and many users are unaware of how much of their movement is retained by default.; Lonboard it is a notebook visualisation library, not a mapping application, so there is no editing, no layout, no map export for print and no sharing beyond distributing the notebook or an HTML file
- They diverge on capability: Google Maps covers Turn-by-turn navigation, Lonboard covers GeoArrow binary transfer.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Maps and Lonboard actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Maps | Lonboard |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free consumer app, funded by Google's advertising business | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Linux, macOS, Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Maps
- Turn-by-turn navigation
- Local search
- Offline maps
- Street View
- Timeline location history
- Live transit and incident reporting
Only in Lonboard
- GeoArrow binary transfer
- GeoPandas input
- deck.gl layers
- Jupyter widget
- Large dataset handling
- Styling by attribute
- Open source licence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Maps
- Getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destinationnot Lonboard
- Searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviewsnot Lonboard
- Downloading an offline map before travelling somewhere with unreliable data coveragenot Lonboard
- Checking real time traffic conditions before or during a drivenot Lonboard
Lonboard
- An analyst exploring a national road or parcel dataset in a notebook where pydeck or ipyleaflet becomes unusable at that sizenot Google Maps
- A researcher publishing a reproducible analysis where the visualisation must run from the same script as the processingnot Google Maps
- A data scientist joining spatial data to model outputs in pandas and needing to see the result immediately without exporting to a GISnot Google Maps
- A team building an internal analysis pipeline on GeoParquet that wants rendering without a serialisation step in the middlenot Google Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Maps
- Location history (Timeline) is stored to the Google account unless disabled, and many users are unaware of how much of their movement is retained by default.
- Local business rankings and prominent ads mix paid placement with organic results, so top results are not purely a relevance ranking.
- Offline maps expire after a period and must be manually refreshed, which can catch travellers out if they rely on an old download without checking it.
- Public transit data quality varies significantly by city and country, and is considerably weaker or absent in many smaller or lower-income regions.
- It is a different product from Google Maps Platform, the paid developer API, and businesses evaluating navigation for their own app need to compare that API's pricing separately rather than assuming free consumer access extends to embedding.
Lonboard
- It is a notebook visualisation library, not a mapping application, so there is no editing, no layout, no map export for print and no sharing beyond distributing the notebook or an HTML file
- Maintenance sits with Development Seed as an open source side output of a consultancy, so roadmap priorities follow client projects and there is no support contract to buy
- Layer coverage is a subset of deck.gl, so an analyst needing a less common layer type has to drop to pydeck or write JavaScript rather than staying in Python
- It expects data already in GeoPandas or Arrow form, which means the performance benefit depends on the rest of your pipeline being Arrow-friendly; reading a large Shapefile is still the slow step
- Rendering happens in the browser, so very large datasets are ultimately limited by the client machine's memory and GPU rather than by the server, and a laptop will still fail on data a workstation handles
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Maps
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited navigation and local search
- Offline maps included
- No subscription tier for the consumer app
Lonboard
Free- LonboardFree
- Open source, no licence fee
- No usage limits
- Installed from PyPI or conda
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Maps if
- You need turn-by-turn navigation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want local search.
Choose Lonboard if
- You need geoarrow binary transfer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want geopandas input.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Maps or Lonboard better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Maps starts at Free and Lonboard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Maps or Lonboard?
- Google Maps starts at Free and Lonboard at Free.
- Does Google Maps or Lonboard run on more platforms?
- Google Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Lonboard runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Google Maps for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Google Maps best used for?
- Google Maps is most often used for getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destination, searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviews, downloading an offline map before travelling somewhere with unreliable data coverage, checking real time traffic conditions before or during a drive. Of those, getting turn-by-turn driving or transit directions to a destination and searching for and comparing nearby restaurants, shops or services with reviews are not what Lonboard is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Maps do that Lonboard cannot?
- Google Maps covers Turn-by-turn navigation, Local search, Offline maps, Street View. Lonboard covers GeoArrow binary transfer, GeoPandas input, deck.gl layers, Jupyter widget.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Google Maps: Is Google Maps free?
Yes, the consumer app is free with no subscription for navigation, local search or offline maps.
Lonboard: Why not just use pydeck?
pydeck serialises geometry to GeoJSON to reach the browser. Lonboard uses a binary GeoArrow pipeline, which is the reason it handles far larger datasets in the same notebook.
Google Maps: Is this the same as Google Maps Platform?
No, Google Maps Platform is a separate, metered API product sold to developers embedding map functionality into their own apps and websites, with its own usage-based pricing.
Lonboard: Who maintains it?
Development Seed, a geospatial engineering consultancy, as an open source project. There is no commercial support offering.
Google Maps: Does Google Maps track my location history?
It can, through the optional Timeline feature, which is on by default in some configurations and can be reviewed or disabled in Google account settings.
Lonboard: Does it work outside Jupyter?
It is built as a Jupyter widget. Exporting to standalone HTML is possible, but the intended environment is a notebook.
Lonboard: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes, it is open source with no licence fee.
Related pages
More on Google Maps
Other head to heads
- Google Maps vs Ride with GPS
- Google Maps vs onX Maps
- Google Maps vs Citymapper
- Google Maps vs Transit
- Google Maps vs Trailforks
- Google Maps vs AllTrails
- Google Maps vs Mapbox
- Google Maps vs GRASS GIS
- Google Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- Google Maps vs Felt
- Google Maps vs Geoapify
- Google Maps vs Nominatim
- Google Maps vs Mapzen
- Google Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Google Maps vs OpenLayers
- Google Maps vs OpenRouteService
- Google Maps vs OpenStreetMap
- Google Maps vs deck.gl
- Google Maps vs QGIS
- Google Maps vs CARTO
- Google Maps vs Fused
- Google Maps vs Potree
- Google Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Google Maps vs SAGA GIS
- Google Maps vs WhiteboxTools
- Google Maps vs Kepler.gl
- Google Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- Google Maps vs Leaflet
- Google Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Google Maps vs TomTom
- Google Maps vs Waze
- Google Maps vs What3words
- Google Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Lonboard vs Ride with GPS
- Lonboard vs onX Maps
- Lonboard vs Citymapper
- Lonboard vs Transit
- Lonboard vs Trailforks
- Lonboard vs AllTrails
- Lonboard vs Mapbox
- Lonboard vs GRASS GIS
- Lonboard vs Geographic Calculator
- Lonboard vs Felt
- Lonboard vs Geoapify
- Lonboard vs Nominatim
- Lonboard vs Mapzen
- Lonboard vs Navmii GPS
- Lonboard vs OpenLayers
- Lonboard vs OpenRouteService
- Lonboard vs OpenStreetMap
- Lonboard vs deck.gl
- Lonboard vs QGIS
- Lonboard vs CARTO
- Lonboard vs Fused
- Lonboard vs Potree
- Lonboard vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Lonboard vs SAGA GIS
- Lonboard vs WhiteboxTools
- Lonboard vs Kepler.gl
- Lonboard vs Agisoft Metashape
- Lonboard vs Leaflet
- Lonboard vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Lonboard vs TomTom
- Lonboard vs Waze
- Lonboard vs What3words
- Lonboard vs TomTom Developer Portal
