Browser Extensions · head to head
GoFullPage vs Mozilla Firefox

Mozilla Firefox
Technology
An independent web browser with its own rendering engine, funded almost entirely by search placement deals.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GoFullPage no pricing information available on website; full-page screenshot functionality available but cost structure unclear; Mozilla Firefox roughly 85 per cent of Mozilla's revenue comes from search default placement deals, overwhelmingly with Google, so the organisation that competes with Chrome depends on Chrome's owner for its funding and any renegotiation lands on Firefox's engineering budget within a quarter.
- They diverge on capability: GoFullPage covers Full page capture, Mozilla Firefox covers Gecko engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GoFullPage and Mozilla Firefox actually diverge.
| Attribute | GoFullPage | Mozilla Firefox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Category | Browser Extensions | Technology |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GoFullPage
- Full page capture
- Auto scrolling
- Multiple formats
- One-click capture
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
Only in Mozilla Firefox
- Gecko engine
- Full webRequest blocking
- Total Cookie Protection
- Container tabs
- Extended Support Release
- policies.json and ADMX
- Built-in developer tools
- Firefox Sync
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GoFullPage
- Capturing entire web pages for bug reportsnot Mozilla Firefox
- Documenting website screenshots for compliance recordsnot Mozilla Firefox
- Creating full-page references for design reviewsnot Mozilla Firefox
Mozilla Firefox
- Web development where you need to test against a non-Chromium engine before shipping, because Chromium-only testing hides real bugsnot GoFullPage
- Users who require a full-strength content blocker, which Chrome's Manifest V3 no longer permitsnot GoFullPage
- Managed fleets that need a browser on a slow release cadence with Group Policy control, using the ESR channelnot GoFullPage
- Handling several accounts on the same service at once through container tabs, without separate profiles or private windowsnot GoFullPage
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GoFullPage
- No pricing information available on website; full-page screenshot functionality available but cost structure unclear
Mozilla Firefox
- Roughly 85 per cent of Mozilla's revenue comes from search default placement deals, overwhelmingly with Google, so the organisation that competes with Chrome depends on Chrome's owner for its funding and any renegotiation lands on Firefox's engineering budget within a quarter.
- Desktop market share sits at a few per cent, so commercial sites are tested against Chrome and Safari and a Firefox-only rendering or WebRTC bug is triaged as low priority by the site owner, leaving you with the workaround.
- On iOS and iPadOS the browser is a WebKit shell required by Apple's rules, so it delivers the interface and Sync but none of the engine, extension or tracking-protection behaviour that make Firefox worth choosing on desktop.
- Mozilla declines to implement several hardware-facing APIs on principle, including WebUSB, WebSerial, Web Bluetooth and WebHID, so a web application that talks to a device simply does not run and no configuration flag changes that.
- Enterprise management is limited to policies.json and ADMX templates; there is no first-party equivalent of Chrome Browser Cloud Management, so fleet-wide reporting on versions and extensions requires third-party tooling you have to buy or build.
- Mozilla repeatedly ships decisions its own user base objects to, such as enabling Privacy Preserving Attribution by default and the 2025 Terms of Use rewrite, and reversals arrive after the news cycle, so deploying it on a privacy argument means owning the communications work each time.
Pricing, plan by plan
GoFullPage
Free- FreeFree
- Full page capture
- PNG export
- PDF export
Mozilla Firefox
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Mozilla Firefox review.
Which should you pick?
Choose GoFullPage if
- You need full page capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want auto scrolling.
Choose Mozilla Firefox if
- You need gecko engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want full webrequest blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is GoFullPage or Mozilla Firefox better?
- Neither clearly leads. GoFullPage starts at Free and Mozilla Firefox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GoFullPage or Mozilla Firefox?
- GoFullPage starts at Free and Mozilla Firefox at Free.
- Does GoFullPage or Mozilla Firefox run on more platforms?
- GoFullPage runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge. Mozilla Firefox runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use GoFullPage for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GoFullPage best used for?
- GoFullPage is most often used for capturing entire web pages for bug reports, documenting website screenshots for compliance records, creating full-page references for design reviews. Of those, capturing entire web pages for bug reports and documenting website screenshots for compliance records are not what Mozilla Firefox is typically brought in for.
- What can GoFullPage do that Mozilla Firefox cannot?
- GoFullPage covers Full page capture, Auto scrolling, Multiple formats, One-click capture. Mozilla Firefox covers Gecko engine, Full webRequest blocking, Total Cookie Protection, Container tabs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GoFullPage: How much does GoFullPage cost?
GoFullPage pricing information is not available on the website. GoFullPage is a Chrome extension for full-page screenshot capture, but specific costs, subscription tiers, or feature limits are not disclosed online.
SourceMozilla Firefox: Does uBlock Origin still work on Firefox?
Yes. Firefox has kept the blocking webRequest API that Chrome removed with Manifest V3, so uBlock Origin runs with its full rule set rather than the cut-down Lite version Chrome requires.
Mozilla Firefox: Is Firefox on iPhone the same browser?
No. Apple's platform rules require it to use WebKit, so on iOS and iPadOS you get Firefox's interface, Sync and bookmarks on top of Safari's engine. The privacy and extension behaviour are not the same.
Mozilla Firefox: How is Mozilla funded, and does that matter?
Mainly by payments for making a search engine the default, with Google as the dominant payer. It matters because it is a single-source dependency on a direct competitor, and it has been the subject of antitrust litigation whose outcome Mozilla does not control.
Mozilla Firefox: Can I manage it across a company fleet?
Yes, through policies.json or Windows Group Policy with the ADMX templates, and the ESR channel gives you a roughly yearly major version instead of four-weekly. There is no first-party cloud management console, so reporting needs other tooling.
Mozilla Firefox: Will every site work in it?
Most will. The exceptions cluster around sites tested only in Chrome, legacy enterprise applications, and anything using WebUSB, WebSerial, Web Bluetooth or WebHID, which Firefox does not implement at all.
Related pages
More on Mozilla Firefox
Other head to heads
- GoFullPage vs Raindrop.io
- GoFullPage vs Pocket
- GoFullPage vs Privacy Badger
- GoFullPage vs Dark Reader
- GoFullPage vs Awesome Screenshot
- GoFullPage vs Fireshot
- GoFullPage vs Nimbus Screenshot
- GoFullPage vs Evernote Web Clipper
- GoFullPage vs Arc
- GoFullPage vs Instapaper
- GoFullPage vs Mercury Reader
- GoFullPage vs Momentum
- GoFullPage vs Violentmonkey
- GoFullPage vs Wappalyzer
- GoFullPage vs WhatFont
- GoFullPage vs Honey
- GoFullPage vs Keeper
- GoFullPage vs LanguageTool
- GoFullPage vs Google Chrome
- GoFullPage vs Microsoft Edge
- GoFullPage vs Safari
- GoFullPage vs Jenkins
- GoFullPage vs Plane
- GoFullPage vs Vim
- GoFullPage vs Kubernetes
- GoFullPage vs PostHog
- GoFullPage vs GitHub
- GoFullPage vs Neovim
- GoFullPage vs Eclipse
- GoFullPage vs Dropbox
- GoFullPage vs Miro
- GoFullPage vs Personetics
- GoFullPage vs Microsoft Outlook
- Mozilla Firefox vs Raindrop.io
- Mozilla Firefox vs Pocket
- Mozilla Firefox vs Privacy Badger
- Mozilla Firefox vs Dark Reader
- Mozilla Firefox vs Awesome Screenshot
- Mozilla Firefox vs Fireshot
- Mozilla Firefox vs Nimbus Screenshot
- Mozilla Firefox vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Mozilla Firefox vs Arc
- Mozilla Firefox vs Instapaper
- Mozilla Firefox vs Mercury Reader
- Mozilla Firefox vs Momentum
- Mozilla Firefox vs Violentmonkey
- Mozilla Firefox vs Wappalyzer
- Mozilla Firefox vs WhatFont
- Mozilla Firefox vs Honey
- Mozilla Firefox vs Keeper
- Mozilla Firefox vs LanguageTool
- Mozilla Firefox vs Google Chrome
- Mozilla Firefox vs Microsoft Edge
- Mozilla Firefox vs Safari
- Mozilla Firefox vs Jenkins
- Mozilla Firefox vs Plane
- Mozilla Firefox vs Vim
- Mozilla Firefox vs Kubernetes
- Mozilla Firefox vs PostHog
- Mozilla Firefox vs GitHub
- Mozilla Firefox vs Neovim
- Mozilla Firefox vs Eclipse
- Mozilla Firefox vs Dropbox
- Mozilla Firefox vs Miro
- Mozilla Firefox vs Personetics
- Mozilla Firefox vs Microsoft Outlook

