Developer Tools · head to head
GNAT Pro vs Metasploit

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Metasploit
Cybersecurity
The world's most used penetration testing framework
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Metasploit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes; Metasploit the free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GNAT Pro and Metasploit actually diverge.
| Attribute | GNAT Pro | Metasploit |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Desktop, Cli |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2000 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GNAT Pro
Nothing recorded that Metasploit does not also cover.
Only in Metasploit
- Exploit database
- Payload generation
- Post-exploitation
- Evasion modules
- Auxiliary scanners
- Social engineering
- Credential harvesting
- Session management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot Metasploit
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot Metasploit
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot Metasploit
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot Metasploit
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot Metasploit
Metasploit
- Penetration testing and exploit development against known vulnerabilitiesnot GNAT Pro
- Validating whether a reported vulnerability is actually exploitablenot GNAT Pro
- Running phishing and credential attack simulations on the Pro editionnot GNAT Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Metasploit
- The free Framework edition is command line only; the web interface is Pro only
- Automated exploitation, automated credential attacks and antivirus evading dynamic payloads are restricted to Metasploit Pro
- Reporting, audit wizards, task chains and closed loop vulnerability validation are Pro only
- Rapid7 publishes no price for Metasploit Pro and routes buyers to contact sales
Pricing, plan by plan
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Metasploit
Free- Metasploit Framework (OSS)Free
- Open source
- 1500+ exploits
- Command line
- Metasploit ProFree
- Web interface
- Automated testing
- Phishing campaigns
Which should you pick?
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from Metasploit on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Metasploit if
- You need exploit database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want payload generation.
Questions people ask
- Is GNAT Pro or Metasploit better?
- Neither clearly leads. GNAT Pro starts at On request and Metasploit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GNAT Pro or Metasploit?
- Metasploit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for GNAT Pro and Free for Metasploit.
- Does GNAT Pro or Metasploit run on more platforms?
- GNAT Pro runs on Web. Metasploit runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use Metasploit for free?
- Yes. Metasploit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GNAT Pro starts at On request.
- What is GNAT Pro best used for?
- GNAT Pro is most often used for building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards, developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance, integrating ada, c/c++, and rust components in single codebase, managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and sboms. Of those, building certified avionics software meeting do-178b/c standards and developing automotive embedded systems with iso-26262 compliance are not what Metasploit is typically brought in for.
- What can GNAT Pro do that Metasploit cannot?
- Metasploit covers Exploit database, Payload generation, Post-exploitation, Evasion modules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceMetasploit: Is Metasploit Framework free to use?
Yes, Metasploit Framework is available as free open-source software with source code accessible via GitHub. Community support is provided through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email.
SourceGNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceMetasploit: What is the difference between Metasploit Framework and Metasploit Pro?
Metasploit Framework is the free open-source version. Metasploit Pro is a commercial offering with customer support from Rapid7, though specific pricing and features are not detailed on the download page.
SourceMetasploit: What support is available for the free Framework version?
Community-based support for Metasploit Framework is available through Slack, GitHub, Twitter, and email ([email protected]). Commercial customers using Metasploit Pro receive customer support from Rapid7.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs RAD Studio
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- GNAT Pro vs Helix
- GNAT Pro vs JetBrains Rider
- GNAT Pro vs Coder
- GNAT Pro vs StackBlitz
- GNAT Pro vs ConfigCat
- GNAT Pro vs Nix
- GNAT Pro vs Nixpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Octopus Deploy
- GNAT Pro vs Okteto
- GNAT Pro vs OpsLevel
- GNAT Pro vs PartyKit
- GNAT Pro vs 1Password
- GNAT Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- GNAT Pro vs Norton 360
- GNAT Pro vs LastPass
- GNAT Pro vs Burp Suite
- GNAT Pro vs OWASP ZAP
- GNAT Pro vs Syft
- GNAT Pro vs Wireshark
- GNAT Pro vs HashiCorp Vault
- GNAT Pro vs Bitwarden
- GNAT Pro vs Semgrep
- GNAT Pro vs Passbolt
- GNAT Pro vs RoboForm
- GNAT Pro vs Sardine
- GNAT Pro vs Semperis
- GNAT Pro vs SentinelOne
- GNAT Pro vs Shufti Pro
- GNAT Pro vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Metasploit vs CLion
- Metasploit vs Rust
- Metasploit vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Metasploit vs Keil MDK
- Metasploit vs RAD Studio
- Metasploit vs Penpot
- Metasploit vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Metasploit vs Helix
- Metasploit vs JetBrains Rider
- Metasploit vs Coder
- Metasploit vs StackBlitz
- Metasploit vs ConfigCat
- Metasploit vs Nix
- Metasploit vs Nixpacks
- Metasploit vs Octopus Deploy
- Metasploit vs Okteto
- Metasploit vs OpsLevel
- Metasploit vs PartyKit
- Metasploit vs 1Password
- Metasploit vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Metasploit vs Norton 360
- Metasploit vs LastPass
- Metasploit vs Burp Suite
- Metasploit vs OWASP ZAP
- Metasploit vs Syft
- Metasploit vs Wireshark
- Metasploit vs HashiCorp Vault
- Metasploit vs Bitwarden
- Metasploit vs Semgrep
- Metasploit vs Passbolt
- Metasploit vs RoboForm
- Metasploit vs Sardine
- Metasploit vs Semperis
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne
- Metasploit vs Shufti Pro
- Metasploit vs SentinelOne Singularity
